Is Eutychianism a factor in Lutheran theology other than in the Lord's Supper?

[Mr. Bultitude]

A common reformed critique of the Lutheran doctrine of the Lord's Supper is that their conception of Christ's presence in the elements (a belief in the ubiquity of his human nature) is Eutychian; reciprocally, they accuse us of Nestorianism.

My question is, are there other points in their theology where a latent (or even realized) Eutychianism shines through?

 

[RamistThomist]

Depends on how they utilize the communicatio maiestica in the Two Natures. If the divine attributes are attributed to the human attributes, then yes, they are Eutychian. However, few would be so crude. My understanding of Lutheranism and communicatio maiestica is that the divine glory is attributed to the human nature of Jesus after the Resurrection. In which case it isn't Eutychian.