Ben Zartman
Puritan Board Junior
Then there is nothing to argue about: everyone believes that remission of sins has only ever been by the shedding of Christ's blood. So the question that remains is: why bother taking on a new name contra the "20th century RB" position?We 1689 Federalists haven't been coy about this at all. When we say "Covenant of Grace", we mean "The New Covenant in Christ's Blood".
We've been saying that over and over. I am not sure how you missed this.