Infidel Guys Podcast

Discussion in 'Defending the Faith' started by caddy, Jul 10, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. caddy

    caddy Puritan Board Senior

    How do I listen to Paul's Pod Cast debate?

    I'm just not seeing it....


    Nevermind: Got it....

    [Edited on 7-10-2006 by caddy]
     
  2. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Puritan Board Doctor

    Go to Unchained Radio, should see a big icon "On Air" and click on that
     
  3. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    do we have a "peanut gallery" set up?
     
  4. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    Yeah! use his opponents own words to define the debate!
     
  5. fivepointcalvinist

    fivepointcalvinist Puritan Board Sophomore

    go Paul!!! :banana:
     
  6. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    I am loving his definitions and setting the Reformed Doctrines as his worldview.

    And pointing out the pointlessness of Atheism.
     
  7. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    ooo! killing Barker's presuppositional platform!
     
  8. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    uh-huh - damning Paul with "faint praise"...

    "If you write a book, I'll read it..."

    and begins with an EMOTIONAL APPEAL!!!
     
  9. fivepointcalvinist

    fivepointcalvinist Puritan Board Sophomore

    doesnt presupposing anything presuppose logic? this guy is off to a bad start...
     
  10. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    "The only way we have found to know if something is true is to 'check it out'"???

    ...deeeeep....

    [Edited on 7-10-2006 by jdlongmire]
     
  11. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    ah - the ambiguity of Truth...no wait...little "t" truth...
     
  12. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    "In most cases, truth is NOT absolute..."

    ...and of course, that is absolutely true...
     
  13. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    ...again - the ambiguous definition of atheism - set the stage to cloud the issue...been there, done that...
     
  14. fivepointcalvinist

    fivepointcalvinist Puritan Board Sophomore

    dan relies on Gods immutability to maintain uniformity of anything he can "check out", but yet reproaches God for the same. what incoherency!!
     
  15. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    ...with the presupposition that an omniscient and omnipotent being is limited by the logic/law of space-time...
     
  16. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    Barker's argument is weak, weak, weak...what a weak opening statement.
     
  17. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    Time, dude!
     
  18. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    where to start?
     
  19. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    YEAH! Confront him with his own weak definitions...with his own words!

    [Edited on 7-10-2006 by jdlongmire]

    [Edited on 7-10-2006 by jdlongmire]
     
  20. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    "I don't OBEY my mind????"
     
  21. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    Which brain is working logically and which one is not?

    Beautiful.

    [Edited on 7-11-2006 by jdlongmire]
     
  22. fivepointcalvinist

    fivepointcalvinist Puritan Board Sophomore

    why does it keep cutting out!!!! :banghead:
     
  23. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    Ah, the talking snake...I have seen a talking snake...ever watched the Jungle Book?

    This presupposes what is has always been. Presupposes that the serpent's physicality could not have been manipulated.
     
  24. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Puritan Board Doctor

    "How's the LSD?" LOL :banana:
     
  25. fivepointcalvinist

    fivepointcalvinist Puritan Board Sophomore

    but Paul can account for his epistemology! how does this guy account for induction? answer the question!
     
  26. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    I would use an example of virtual reality.
     
  27. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    I would site the source of Dan's statement. The source is not God. The source is capable of lying.

    [Edited on 7-11-2006 by jdlongmire]
     
  28. fivepointcalvinist

    fivepointcalvinist Puritan Board Sophomore

    post hoc reasoning via dan...
     
  29. panta dokimazete

    panta dokimazete Panting Donkey Machete

    Assert...assert...assert.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page