JTB.SDG
Puritan Board Junior
Guys,
The question in the heading was put in a simplistic way, but here is my question:
The question is actually related more especially to the Noahic Covenant. In light of all the gospel truths revealed in the Noahic Covenant, why is it that it seems to be given so much less attention in the NT? (For that matter, why is the Davidic Covenant given less attention?) I know we have a lot in the NT about Noah and David, but what I mean is: Why doesn't Paul appeal to the promises made to Noah or David in defending justification as he does to Abraham? Was it because the different OT manifestations of the Covenant of Grace convey different particular truths about the Covenant of Grace, and though all the stages of the covenant convey grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, some manifestations of the Covenant of Grace communicate particular truths more clearly than others (IE, Abraham: how we're justified; Noah: why we need to be justified--because God's wrath is coming)? Or is it perhaps, that the covenants with Noah and Abraham respectively, point just as clearly and surely to Christ and the gospel, but whereas God's covenant with Noah communicates these truths mostly through pictures (much like with Moses at Sinai), God's covenant with Abraham does so mostly through actual promises? Thoughts?
The question in the heading was put in a simplistic way, but here is my question:
The question is actually related more especially to the Noahic Covenant. In light of all the gospel truths revealed in the Noahic Covenant, why is it that it seems to be given so much less attention in the NT? (For that matter, why is the Davidic Covenant given less attention?) I know we have a lot in the NT about Noah and David, but what I mean is: Why doesn't Paul appeal to the promises made to Noah or David in defending justification as he does to Abraham? Was it because the different OT manifestations of the Covenant of Grace convey different particular truths about the Covenant of Grace, and though all the stages of the covenant convey grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, some manifestations of the Covenant of Grace communicate particular truths more clearly than others (IE, Abraham: how we're justified; Noah: why we need to be justified--because God's wrath is coming)? Or is it perhaps, that the covenants with Noah and Abraham respectively, point just as clearly and surely to Christ and the gospel, but whereas God's covenant with Noah communicates these truths mostly through pictures (much like with Moses at Sinai), God's covenant with Abraham does so mostly through actual promises? Thoughts?