I read the following post yesterday on Doug Wilson's blog.
http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=3390&Data=3003#posts
(sorry, I don't know how to do the neat link)
Is there a thread here that explains the "either/or" approach he and many of the commentors are taking in the above post? I figured out that Greek=Enlightenment=WSC only=bad and Hebrew=Postmodern=good. What is the point of choosing one or the other though?
Is the point that "Hebrew"-style layering would result in dialog as people discuss which "layer" is operating on a particular passage, and "Greek"-style interpretation involves "truth-claims" which are suspect?
I apologize if this question is too simplistic or off-base because I missed an obvious point in the referenced post.
Thank you for any help you might be able to offer.
Carolyn Martinson
Attending Covenant Presbyterian OPC, Baldwin, WI
River Falls, WI
http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=3390&Data=3003#posts
(sorry, I don't know how to do the neat link)
Is there a thread here that explains the "either/or" approach he and many of the commentors are taking in the above post? I figured out that Greek=Enlightenment=WSC only=bad and Hebrew=Postmodern=good. What is the point of choosing one or the other though?
Is the point that "Hebrew"-style layering would result in dialog as people discuss which "layer" is operating on a particular passage, and "Greek"-style interpretation involves "truth-claims" which are suspect?
I apologize if this question is too simplistic or off-base because I missed an obvious point in the referenced post.
Thank you for any help you might be able to offer.
Carolyn Martinson
Attending Covenant Presbyterian OPC, Baldwin, WI
River Falls, WI