Puritan Board Graduate
i have been working my way through Kung's book Justification: the doctrine of Karl Barth and a Catholic reflection slowly but surely, i am at the catholic reflection part and i finished the Barth part about 6 months ago. number one i am unconvinced that Barth's doctrine represents the logical proggresion of reformed theology, which is Kung's working assumption and one that to my knowledge he never defends. two it seems to me that there may be similaraties between this book and what NPP/FV teaches, although i am not sure. am i completly wrong here or is there a similaraty between Barth/Kung and NPP/FV on the general theology of justification or anything else?