Greek and Head Coverings

Discussion in 'Languages' started by CharlieJ, Feb 27, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CharlieJ

    CharlieJ Puritan Board Junior

    Thank you for reminding me of this. Schreiner has a very thorough treatment of the passage available http://www.sbts.edu/documents/tschreiner/RBMW_5.pdf.

    Schreiner does think that the covering is a physical shawl. However, his arguments against the hair position are not, in my opinion, very strong. Also, I question some of his linguistic methodology in deciding between a face veil and a back shawl. However, he is an excellent scholar and the treatment is very valuable.

    Concerning the preposition, Schreiner reaches his conclusion after having rejected hair as the covering for other reasons. That's fine. I am inclined to agree with him. The context is determinative. However, substitution is one of the primary meanings of that preposition and it (I think) makes sense in the context. People who think that αντι signifies substitution are well within the bounds of the preposition and can argue a good case.

    Notice that Schreiner readily concedes that this is an extremely difficult passage. He is committed to doing the best exegesis he can, as am I. The point that I intended to make with my post is that different views on this passage have arisen from a careful study of the Greek text, not through ignorance or prejudice.

    -----Added 2/27/2009 at 08:40:24 EST-----

    According to the hair position, the flow of thought would run something like this. "If you will keep your hair uncovered (hanging out loose in an unkempt and socially shocking fashion), then why not do something really shocking and shave it! But if it's shameful to have your head shaved, keep your hair decently and in order."

    In other words, it is not long hair vs. short hair, as the debate is sometimes framed. I myself probably lean toward the physical covering view, but the hair view is not without its merits.
     
  2. LadyFlynt

    LadyFlynt Puritan Board Doctor

    Until there was a complaint made, most of my posts were quotes of Church Fathers and other Ministers. A good portion more were made towards women. I did not make a dogmatic statement. I made a statement of how I had been taught about that Scripture and am ALWAYS willing to hear out another's point of view on it. It also appears strange that you would pick me out of all the women that have participated in this discussion. My husband, though not directly participating, has been a member of this board as has my father in law in the past AND we discuss any threads I participate in on here. You are not my husband. Women are not subject to ALL Men of the Church or else there would be quite a mess. Please see to your own wife.
     
  3. MW

    MW Puritanboard Amanuensis

    Uncovered hair cannot be identified with unkempt hair for the simple reason that the man is instructed to pray uncovered. He certainly is not being told to pray with his hair hanging out in a socially shocking fashion.
     
  4. kvanlaan

    kvanlaan Puritan Board Doctor

    I realize the implications of the post above, but perhaps we should also realize the implications of women upholding what scripture says when men won't do so. Deborah was raised up in a certain situation, and the fact that some women are needing to take the lead on this topic should make us reflect as to why.
     
  5. Archlute

    Archlute Puritan Board Senior

    Again, the attitude displayed here betrays the very issue at hand. It is a principle of Scripture that you are subject to, not merely this man or the other. I pick out your statement, because as noted in my last post, you have had a history on this board regarding this issue, and very often your statements have indeed been dogmatic and pointed toward the men with whom you would disagree, as I would say your response was to my little aside about Moses. I would never have corrected you if you had not decided to retort in the manner in which you did. That was the problem that sparked it all.

    Just because Mark has not felt a need to make a correction, does not mean that your words and demeanor are above correcting. If I see a woman in the church doing things that she ought not, I take it as my brotherly prerogative to make a correction. It matters not to me very much if her husband refuses to do so, for if there were a Christian brother who did not mind his wife engaging in other practices or behaviors that were detrimental to her Christian testimony it would merely be a fault of his, and not a declaration as to its justification.
     
  6. MW

    MW Puritanboard Amanuensis

    :judge:If the board allows a lady to speak, and you willingly participate in the discussions on this board, then you are bound to allow the lady to speak. If you have anything further to say you should take it up with the administration.:judge:
     
  7. Archlute

    Archlute Puritan Board Senior

    Since Deborah and Barak were dealing with the external foe of Israel, the Canaanites, it might possibly work better if we were to use this passage to encourage women in taking the lead against worldly institutions where the church has failed, but since these arguments almost always take place within the confines of the body of Christ, not so much.

    I do think, however, that Judges 4 gets way too much press in our day for the limits presented by that confining parallel mentioned above!
     
  8. MW

    MW Puritanboard Amanuensis

    :judge:This thread is about Greek and head coverings; any other discussion should be taken elsewhere. Henceforth irrelevant posts will be deleted.:judge:
     
  9. lynnie

    lynnie Puritan Board Graduate

    charlie-

    "Notice that Schreiner readily concedes that this is an extremely difficult passage. He is committed to doing the best exegesis he can, as am I. The point that I intended to make with my post is that different views on this passage have arisen from a careful study of the Greek text, not through ignorance or prejudice."

    Fair enough! I apologize for any implication that you or anybody else was not bothering to look past English.

    I do think that where we have multiple words in Greek all being translated into one English word- on any subject- confusion can arise. The word "love" is one example in addition to "covering." Then here we have one Greek word translated with two English words ( "tradition", and "handed down"). I always appreciate when my pastor is working through a hard text when he takes the time to check out Greek and Hebrew and commentaries on them before he preaches.

    I found that for hub and me, seeing 1 Cor 11 in the Greek was the end of the debate. ( not so at the PB though :) )
     
  10. LadyFlynt

    LadyFlynt Puritan Board Doctor

    My apologies, I crossposted with the warning.
     
  11. lynnie

    lynnie Puritan Board Graduate

    Just to clarify, Mark above is married to me, not the lovely lady Flynt.
     
  12. LadyFlynt

    LadyFlynt Puritan Board Doctor

    Thanks, I was scratching my head on that one :lol:
     
  13. Mark Hettler

    Mark Hettler Puritan Board Freshman

    If I found that my wife was making corrections of other men without wearing a head covering, I would do the same.
     
  14. kvanlaan

    kvanlaan Puritan Board Doctor

  15. Mark Hettler

    Mark Hettler Puritan Board Freshman

    Here is a link to something I wrote 25 years ago. Back then I was heavily involved in some borderline excessive charismatic stuff, and 25 years later I don't know whether to be appalled or amused at the way I interspersed citations of charismatic wack jobs along with the citations of solid biblical scholars. But I think that to the extent that my reasoning was based on the latter, it's still pertinent.

    http://mhettler.home.comcast.net/papers/headcov.doc
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page