Hello,
I would assume this topic has been raised somewhere previously, however it’s just come up again for me as its contained in a book, "Bethlehem to Patmos" by Paul W Barnett, which is required pre-reading for a degree in Theology I'm starting in January.
Barnett states that Christ would have been born about 6 BC, and commenced His public ministry at 30 AD, and would have been crucified in 33 AD.
He bases a lot of his thinking on the assumption that the crucifixion was on Friday. I can understand that Sunday would then be, "the third day" if part of Friday, Saturday and Sunday morning are to all be considered days, yet this to me seems to conflict with Matthew 12:40 (KJV):
Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
I also struggle with Christ not commencing his public ministry until he was 36, as Jewish priests commenced at the age of 30, and Christ was a priest offering himself.
So [2] issues, is it possible for Christ to have actually been born on 0 AD if the crucifixion was on Thursday? And why do people insist that He had to have been crucified on a Friday, if it seems to conflict with the scriptures in several areas?
I'd expect people to be fairly dogmatic about this, I'm open to the possibility of both views being correct, but I'd like an explanation of, "3 days and 3 nights" being violated, and I'd also like to hear both views from people who actually hold to each view if possible please.
Many thanks in advance
I would assume this topic has been raised somewhere previously, however it’s just come up again for me as its contained in a book, "Bethlehem to Patmos" by Paul W Barnett, which is required pre-reading for a degree in Theology I'm starting in January.
Barnett states that Christ would have been born about 6 BC, and commenced His public ministry at 30 AD, and would have been crucified in 33 AD.
He bases a lot of his thinking on the assumption that the crucifixion was on Friday. I can understand that Sunday would then be, "the third day" if part of Friday, Saturday and Sunday morning are to all be considered days, yet this to me seems to conflict with Matthew 12:40 (KJV):
Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
I also struggle with Christ not commencing his public ministry until he was 36, as Jewish priests commenced at the age of 30, and Christ was a priest offering himself.
So [2] issues, is it possible for Christ to have actually been born on 0 AD if the crucifixion was on Thursday? And why do people insist that He had to have been crucified on a Friday, if it seems to conflict with the scriptures in several areas?
I'd expect people to be fairly dogmatic about this, I'm open to the possibility of both views being correct, but I'd like an explanation of, "3 days and 3 nights" being violated, and I'd also like to hear both views from people who actually hold to each view if possible please.
Many thanks in advance
Last edited: