Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are your thoughts? Does Genesis 9 mean all the global warming stuff is a hoax? Or should we take it seriously?
...human-caused global catastrophe is nowhere spoken of in Scripture.
There is indeed global climate changed, but that is based upon mechanisms placed into the earth and its operating system by God, and we really are not contributing at all to how that functions. We go up 1 degree for a 20 year period, as in the 1970's, fair was global Ice Age, and now into natural warming cycle 1 degree, and fair of melting polar caps.What are your thoughts? Does Genesis 9 mean all the global warming stuff is a hoax? Or should we take it seriously?
Dudes have simply exchanged the grass skirt for a lab coat. Same scam.
Global warming alarmists talk about the polar ice caps melting and drowning cities. Hence why we brought it up.I'm super confused. I see nothing in Genesis 9 that rejects or acknowledges climate change. I think Genesis 8 could be used to reject climate change in the sense that it caused by anything other than natural causes.
Genesis 8:21 And when the Lord smelled the ground because of man, for the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done. the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.”
I'm super confused. I see nothing in Genesis 9 that rejects or acknowledges climate change. I think Genesis 8 could be used to reject climate change in the sense that it caused by anything other than natural causes.
Genesis 8:21 And when the Lord smelled the ground because of man, for the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done. the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.”
I'm super confused. I see nothing in Genesis 9 that rejects or acknowledges climate change. I think Genesis 8 could be used to reject climate change in the sense that it caused by anything other than natural causes.
Genesis 8:21 And when the Lord smelled the ground because of man, for the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done. the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.”
No matter how frustrated we may get with the politics that surround global warming claims, we must be careful to be forthright in the way we use Scripture. To maintain our integrity as people who handle the Word of God with care and would never use it sloppily to make a political point, we should not assert that Genesis says any more or less than it actually says.
So what does it say? First, let's notice that it speaks generally about the constancy of temperatures and seasons but does not promise zero change over time nor rule out multi-year cycles (which are well-documented with phenomena like El Nino, and occur elsewhere in Genesis with the seven-year famine foretold through Joseph, for example). It is very clear from Genesis 8 and 9, and from other parts of Scripture, that God ultimately controls the weather.
The passage also seems to say that God will not allow catastrophic season change that upsets life on earth, meaning that the basic seasonal patterns will remain at least until the end-times renewal. Mankind cannot thwart this will of God, nor make the rainy seasons start or stop. It is foolish arrogance to suggest we can, and it undermines faith in the living God. Again, these truths are backed up by many other Scripture passages, some of which have already been mentioned in this thread, giving us good reason to say these are accurate conclusions to draw from Genesis 8 and 9.
But as with most theology, we need some nuance here. We go beyond what the passage says if we claim mankind is a complete non-player. Both the post-flood narrative and the creation narrative mention our responsibility to be good stewards of the earth. This suggests that God may allow our actions to have some measurable effect on living conditions in this world, since the command to be stewards feels deceptive otherwise.
If I dump nuclear waste in your backyard, you may rightly claim that I am harming you even though you know that God ultimately controls whether or not you get cancer. The same could be said for dumping emissions into the atmosphere, provided we could show a connection between those emissions and the weather and could conclude that the connection is a bad one overall (which is a valid matter for scientific and managerial debate).
"Love your neighbor" applies here. So does "You shall not put the Lord your God to the test." Genesis does NOT go so far as to claim we may blithely ignore stewardship or neighborly love because God has promised to forestall any consequences for our actions. Such a conclusion is neither stated in the passage nor supported elsewhere in Scripture.
I thought the Scots would like a slightly warmer climatealarmist global warming
It is hugely and amusingly ironic to me that now that the God-haters have taken the rainbow, His promise never to destroy the earth with floods again, and given it another meaning of their own, one of their biggest panics is about flooding.
It is unbelievably frustrating to me that every time a wildfire ignites (history shows us that California has always been prey to huge wildfires, even from pioneer days), or a sparrow falls, it's now caused by global warming. Spring tides are now caused by global warming. If it rains: global warming. If it doesn't rain: global warming. Every hurricane is the worst that's ever struck (????). It's incredible how much they illogically pin on this thing.
It is very alarming to me how much very expensive and onerous policy is made according to this falsity, this latest idol of the nations: gas taxes in France (for which the government is being chastised); restrictions on emissions; taxes on carbon; extra fees ( I was charged an additional "environmental fee" once when buying gasoline in Costa Rica). It's hateful because it can personally affect my bottom line, which is never very robust.
...abusing scripture in much the same way as our forefathers did in their condemnations of heliocentrism.