Puritan Board Freshman
What it does, however, is refute creation science as a science.
Why? All science is limited to the natural and outside supernatural - not just creation science.
Since this starlight communicates information that isn't, strictly speaking, accurate, we really can't pursue that line of apologetics any more.
How so? Secular science is just as limited in regards to the supernatural and they also have their unproveable hypotheses like the multiverse.
Unlike creationists, their hypotheses are created wholesale without other links to evidences like creation has.
Why should we creationists concede science to the secularists in lines of apologetics?