In his intro. he states the correct method if interpreting Revelation is a blending of the preterist and the futurist methods. OK, fair enough...this is a subject in which I am seeking to find where I stand, the commentary starts strong the writting is good and cohesisve. About half through...it becomes less so. I was realy dissapointed. Few things are worse in my mind than books..whether a novel or commentary or whatever...begins to "fray" at some point. For those who wonder...no...I cannot put my finger exactly on the point where Ladd seems to lose some focus. It was gradual I suppose. In any event I am very open to two things...imput on wheter it was just me or wheter anyone else had this experience with Ladd, and maybe some stuff that is a little better, it does not have to take Ladd's approach. Grace and Peace.