D. Paul
Puritan Board Sophomore
I've not heard this Q posed in this way. Certainly it has been raised and answered, but I cannot find an answer to it either.
Adam, in the Covenant of Works, is the Federal Head for humanity...ALL humanity. Then comes the fall by which the WHOLE of humanity is plunged into death "through one man's disobedience."
Now Christ, being the second Adam, also becomes Representative, yet NOT for the whole of humanity but only for the "elect".
Imprecise language and hasty conclusions lead from this to Universalism, of course. It seems, in this line, that Adam blew it for everybody so then Christ redeemed it for everybody.
The Q then: Why are all dead in Adam yet God has ordained that only a few will be elect in Christ? Why is it not a One-for-One reversal? Who has addressed it this way in Reformed teaching?
Adam, in the Covenant of Works, is the Federal Head for humanity...ALL humanity. Then comes the fall by which the WHOLE of humanity is plunged into death "through one man's disobedience."
Now Christ, being the second Adam, also becomes Representative, yet NOT for the whole of humanity but only for the "elect".
Imprecise language and hasty conclusions lead from this to Universalism, of course. It seems, in this line, that Adam blew it for everybody so then Christ redeemed it for everybody.
The Q then: Why are all dead in Adam yet God has ordained that only a few will be elect in Christ? Why is it not a One-for-One reversal? Who has addressed it this way in Reformed teaching?