Evagrios of Pontus

Status
Not open for further replies.

RamistThomist

Puritanboard Clerk
Evagrios of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus. Oxford.

Evagrios is a strange character. He was a mediating point between the Origenist synthesis and later writers like Maximus the Confessor. Yet, he could never shake the charges of heresy that one usually found when too near Origen.

Sinkewicz does a good job editing and introducing Evagrios of Pontus's ascetical works (leaving out any commentaries). There is some repetition but his comments do make Evagrios's own work accessible.

Each work follows the standard Evagrian pattern of showing a monk’s progression. Standard 8-fold pattern of vices:

1. Gluttony
2. Fornication
3. Avarice
4. Sadness
5. Anger
6. Acedia: noonday demon, most powerful.
7. Vainglory
8. Pride

More specifically, there is the theme of demonic warfare. The demons fear humility (Eulogios I.25). Interestingly, Evagrios references his opponent Epiphanius’s story of the demon Python. The free will of angels means that demons aren’t evil by nature (Ad Monachos). Demons come for an evil soul at death (idem 23).

The Demon vagabond

This demon attacks around 6 AM. He makes the mind wander. He is intentional. When attacked, Evagrios suggests we stop what we are doing and observe. When you defeat this demon, you will feel sleepy, lethargic, and physically cold (The bodies of demons are very cold and like ice, 33). Dissipate these by intense prayer.

Another theme is prayer. It is the communion of the mind with God (On Prayer 3). Therefore, the mind must be free from representations of passions. Prayer is the laying aside of mental representations (70). We must acquire tears (5).

The vices thicken the mind and make it unable to pray (50).

We pursue virtues for the sake of created beings, and these we pursue for the sake of the Word who gave them being, and he usually manifests himself in the state of prayer (51).

Evaluation

Evagrios himself is quite interesting. There is a heavy Origenist strand, but many of his comments on prayer are quite insightful. His comments on spiritual warfare come from the trenches and are worth considering. He learned from Abbas Macarios of Egypt and Macarios of Alexandria (even if he wasn't quite as balanced).

While Sinkewicz did a great job, he was hamstrung by Oxford. The binding his horrible. It will not survive many readings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top