Steve Curtis
Puritan Board Senior
**Originally, this was posted in the "pastoral concerns" forum, but I wanted to open it up to a broader discussion**
Most (if not all) of us would likely agree that the destruction of fertilized embryos (which often happens in IVF) would be the sinful taking of a human life. Further, most of us likely oppose preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), the process of testing fertilized embryos for genetic diseases for the purpose of selectively implanting the “better” embryos (resulting in the “worse” embryos being discarded). Most also oppose donor eggs or sperm (i.e., third party participation in the pregnancy). With those caveats understood, what are your views on this scenario?
* - A married couple chooses to pursue IVF after being diagnosed with infertility issues
* - They instruct that only 2 (or 3) of the eggs extracted be fertilized
* - They further insist that both (or all 3) fertilized eggs be implanted (without conducting PGD)
* - They elect to freeze the extra eggs – but these eggs have not been fertilized – for possible use later (to avoid the costly and perhaps painful process of stimulating the production of eggs)
To begin the discussion, I found a few quotes in a cursory web search:
James Dobson: “in vitro fertilization is less problematic when the donors are husband and wife—if all the embryos are inserted into the uterus (i.e., no embryos are wasted or disposed of after fertilization and no selection process by doctors or parents occurs). As the woman’s body then accepts one or more embryos and rejects the others, the process is left in God’s hands. This seems to violate no moral principles.
Richard Land: ”It is never permissible for Christians to create more embryos than they plan to use.”
Al Mohler: “Christian couples must not embrace the new reproductive technologies without clear biblical and theological reflection. At a bare minimum, Christian couples must commit to the implantation of all embryos, and the selective reduction of none. But this does not alter the fundamentally artificial character of the technology or the moral status of the embryos, and thus IVF presents grave moral issues to the Christian conscience.
R.C. Sproul, Jr.: “Some Christians… only fertilize what they plan to implant, and carry these to term. The problem here, in my judgment, is akin to a problem with birth control- it separates what God has brought together. Though there might be still some latent gnostics in the Christian realm that see the marital act as a necessary evil allowable only when conception is possible, that is not my position. That said, there is something perverse about separating the marital act from its fruit.”