English Annotations and the Expiration of the Judicial Law?

Status
Not open for further replies.

NaphtaliPress

Administrator
Staff member
I'm not interested in a new thread on the lines of the current one, but it sparked me to wonder, as I don't recall them being cited by Foulner; haven't checked Ferguson, Do the English Annotations (sometimes called the Westminster Annotations) address this subject of the Judicial Law's expiration? I looked online at the EEBO copy (the 1645 edition) but could only find statement of the three fold division by John Ley in the Argument at the head of the comments on Exodus.
 

Reformed Covenanter

Puritanboard Commissioner
I'm not interested in a new thread on the lines of the current one, but it sparked me to wonder, as I don't recall them being cited by Foulner; haven't checked Ferguson, Do the English Annotations (sometimes called the Westminster Annotations) address this subject of the Judicial Law's expiration? I looked online at the EEBO copy (the 1645 edition) but could only find statement of the three fold division by John Ley in the Argument at the head of the comments on Exodus.

I think I checked that out recently online, but could find nothing either way.
 

greenbaggins

Administrator
Staff member
I suppose one could look up the commentary on Romans 10:4, Matthew 5:17, Hebrews 6:1-3, 9:11-10:9, and Galatians 3:23ff.
 

VirginiaHuguenot

Puritanboard Librarian
Or check the prooftexts for WCF 19.4, which are:

Gen 49:10 with 1 Pet 2:13-14; Exod 21 throughout; 22:1-29; Mat 5:17 with 5:38-39; 1 Cor 9:8-10

At Gen. 49.10 there is an extended discussion by John Ley concerning the prophesied ending of the Jewish civil polity.

Although not a direct quote from the English Annotations, I have previously cited to the comments of one of the Annotators, who wrote on the judicial laws in another separate commentary, William Gouge (who wrote on I and I Kings, I and II Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, and Job in the English Annotations) on Hebrews 7.12:

Sec. 69. Of the judicial law of the Jews.

Besides the ceremonial law, the Jews had a judicial law, proper and peculiar to that polity. This law concerned especially their civil estate. Many branches of that law appertained to the Jewish priesthood; as, the particular laws about the cities of refuge, whither such as slew any unawares fled, and there abode till the death of the high priest, Num. xxxv.25. And laws about lepers, which the priest was to judge, Lev. xiv.3. And sundy other cases which the priest was to judge of, Deut. xvii.9. So also the laws of distinguishing tribes, Num. xxxvi.7; of reserving inheritances to special tribes and families, of selling them to the next of kin, Ruth iv.4; of raising seed to a brother that died without issue, Gen. xxxviii.8, 9; of all manner of freedoms at the year of jubilee, Lev. xxv.13, etc.

There were other branches of the judicial law which rested upon common equity, and were means of keeping the moral law: as putting to death idolaters and such as enticed others thereunto; and witches, and wilful murderers, and other notorious malefactors. So likewise laws against incest and incestuous marriages; laws of reverencing and obeying superiors and governors, and of dealing justly in borrowing, restoring, buying, selling, and all manner of contracts, Exod. xxii.20; Deut. xiii.9; Exod. xx.18; Num. xxxv.30; Lev. xx.11, etc., 32, 35.

The former sort were abolished together with the priesthood.

The latter sort remain as good directions to order even Christian politics accordingly.

1. By these kinds of laws the wisdom of God was manifested in observing what was fit for the particular kind and condition of people; and in giving them answerable laws, and yet not tying all nations and states thereunto.

2. That liberty which God affordeth to others to have laws most agreeable to their own country, so as they be not contrary to equity and piety, bindeth them more obediently to submit themselves to their own wholesome laws, and to keep peace, unity, and amity among themselves.
 

Reformed Covenanter

Puritanboard Commissioner
Andrew

Could you give me the title of the book that is from and the publisher, place and date of publication and the specific page number please?
 

NaphtaliPress

Administrator
Staff member
I read this the other day before I started this thread. It comes at the end of the discussion of Genesis 49.10 in the Annotations. There are no page numbers so you go by the reference.
 

VirginiaHuguenot

Puritanboard Librarian
Andrew

Could you give me the title of the book that is from and the publisher, place and date of publication and the specific page number please?

William Gouge, Commentary on Hebrews (Solid Ground Christian Books: Birmingham, AL, 2006 reprint of 1980 Kregel Publications edition, which is from the 1866 Nichols edition), Vol. 1, p. 505; and London, 1655, p. 171)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top