Romans 9:16
Puritan Board Freshman
Bruce,
Thanks for the feedback.
The argument as it is stated is incomplete and could be worded a bit more clearly. I do hope your interpretation of the intent is correct. If so, then I have no problem with the point.
Many people (including Reformed people) affirm the salvation of all children of believers who die in infancy (some even go so far as to affirm that of all children irrespective of covenant). Also, the FV would affirm all children of believers are in union with Christ (objective covenantal salvation). This is why omissions are bothersome to me. I hope you are right as to the gentleman’s intent. In fact, based on other excellent posts made by Armourbearer, I am sure you are correct. Nevertheless, I would prefer that what is omitted was expressed. Something like the following would be preferred:
All elect are saved in the CoG
[None of the non elect are saved]
God’s election includes infants and adults
Therefore, elect infants are saved in the covenant of grace as well as elect adults.
Thanks for the feedback.
The argument as it is stated is incomplete and could be worded a bit more clearly. I do hope your interpretation of the intent is correct. If so, then I have no problem with the point.
Many people (including Reformed people) affirm the salvation of all children of believers who die in infancy (some even go so far as to affirm that of all children irrespective of covenant). Also, the FV would affirm all children of believers are in union with Christ (objective covenantal salvation). This is why omissions are bothersome to me. I hope you are right as to the gentleman’s intent. In fact, based on other excellent posts made by Armourbearer, I am sure you are correct. Nevertheless, I would prefer that what is omitted was expressed. Something like the following would be preferred:
All elect are saved in the CoG
[None of the non elect are saved]
God’s election includes infants and adults
Therefore, elect infants are saved in the covenant of grace as well as elect adults.