God created us to be when compkete both a physical body and a soul, as all those who have died in Christ still await when they are glorified whole again.I think it's unfortunate and unhelpful that you are unwilling to answer a simple question. However, I will attempt to answer you. I will also try to put two and two together and work off certain assumptions about your position since you are unwilling to make them explicit for whatever reason.
This is not entirely accurate. In the unity of our person, body and soul, what is said of either part is true of the person. For example, I am six feet tall. This refers specifically to my body and therefore is true of my person, though has very little to do with my soul. I can likewise speak to those attributes that are true of my soul-- even after death-- and say that I am in heaven, though separated from my body. Your construction above is only true if personal attributes are only described as that which involves soul and body (e.g. walking, since it necessitates both volition and physical movement). Since personal attributes are true even when they refer to one part of our humanity, I do not reject the proposition you pose above.
Based on my rejection of your first proposition, saying that Paul is in heaven poses no problem.
Again, since these propositions are built off of a fallacious premise, there is again no real problem. Saint Paul is in heaven. It does not follow that his complete person is in heaven. It is also true that Saint Paul is dead and in the grave. Human persons are made of both material and immaterial substances.
Here is the crux of the problem. You have equated personhood exclusively with the soul. It would seem to logically follow that the body has no real part in the essence of mankind, only their souls according to your argumentation. It now makes perfect sense that you can discard unity between the lifeless body of Christ with the divine nature since the person, in your line of reasoning, is consubstantial with the soul and not the body. Unfortunately, the logical theological errors of this doctrine are many.
So let me try to clear up the remainder of your post:
Persons in the intermediate state are not complete persons. They are waiting to be reunited with their bodies.
A complete person is made of body and soul. Your argumentation suggests that the essence of personhood is the soul, which allows you to take the leap that a soul in heaven is a person in heaven, yet a body on earth has nothing to do with a person. Since a human person is a) made of two parts and b) the attributes of each part are true of the person, then c) we can affirm that the souls in heaven are not existing in absence of their person.
The conundrum here should be irrelevant at this point.
Finally, your appeal to Paul's being out of the body and present with the Lord (2 Cor. 5:8) hardly substantiates your point, since it is the soul that is the concious part of the body. It does not follow that soul = person any more than body = person. Body + soul = person.
I would still appreciate a concise answer to your thoughts on @BayouHuguenot 's post #46. I am confused as to your reasons for not answering this simple question. I'll leave my imagination as to the reason out of it.
Blessings,
Tim