Andrew P.C.
Puritan Board Junior
Many of the Westminster Divines would disagree with this (Rutherford, Gillespie for example) and the Scottish Covenanters would as well. It is interesting because the condition for the Scots to join the assembly was that the Divines had to sign the Solemn League and Covenant. Likewise, the Establishment principle (the original Civil Magistrate chapter) still applies.
You are confusing issues. My statement is fully supported by Rutherford, Gillespie, the Westminster divines, the Westminster Confession's chapter on the civil magistrate, the Solemn League and Covenant, and the establishment principle. To have an establishment one has to recognise the natural validity of the magistrate's authority as a magistrate.
How am I confusing the issues. Did you not say this: "Christianity cannot be the standard of law and justice" ? Christianity IS the standard because Christ is the standard. How is that confusing? Separating the Law from Christ is absurd. Christianity is the standard because anything else is idolatry.