Well I didnt get any substantive discussion going with regard to Shedd. So I thought I would try another stalwart of the Reformed faith, the father of southern presbyterianism.
In 1 John 2:2, it is at least doubtful whether the express phrase, "whole world," can be restrained to the world of elect as including other than Jews. For it is indisputable, that the Apostle extends the propitiation of Christ beyond those whom he speaks of as "we," in verse first. The interpretation described obviously proceeds on the assumption that these are only Jewish believers. Can this be substantiated? Is this catholic epistle addressed only to Jews? This is more than doubtful. It would seem then, that the Apostle´s scope is to console and encourage sinning believers with the thought that since Christ made expiation for every man, there is no danger that He will not be found a propitiation for them who, having already believed, now sincerely turn to him from recent sins. Lectures, p., 525.
So, aside from Dabney rejecting the idea that the holos komos of 1 Jn 2:2 is limited to the elect, how is it that he can say that Christ made an expiation for every man? What does that mean in terms of Dabney's theology?
Any takers?
David
In 1 John 2:2, it is at least doubtful whether the express phrase, "whole world," can be restrained to the world of elect as including other than Jews. For it is indisputable, that the Apostle extends the propitiation of Christ beyond those whom he speaks of as "we," in verse first. The interpretation described obviously proceeds on the assumption that these are only Jewish believers. Can this be substantiated? Is this catholic epistle addressed only to Jews? This is more than doubtful. It would seem then, that the Apostle´s scope is to console and encourage sinning believers with the thought that since Christ made expiation for every man, there is no danger that He will not be found a propitiation for them who, having already believed, now sincerely turn to him from recent sins. Lectures, p., 525.
So, aside from Dabney rejecting the idea that the holos komos of 1 Jn 2:2 is limited to the elect, how is it that he can say that Christ made an expiation for every man? What does that mean in terms of Dabney's theology?
Any takers?
David