I am a new member here, so I'm hoping this isn't an old question:
What about the book "Back to Basics", ed. by David Hagopian?
In light of the FV and NPP controversy, what are we to think of this book?
I am not in agreement with the FV or NPP. Is the perspective in this book the precursor to these movements? Or are these movements a straying from what is proclaimed in this book?
This concerns me since the FV proponents have now been found to use orthodox lanaguage with heterodox meanings. Added to this that Sproul, Bridges, Adams, Beisner, Boice, and others recommend it with Sproul giving a foreword. Have these men been duped and are now recanting their praise of this book? Or is this book orthodox and different from the controversy today?
In the judgment of charity I'm assuming this book does not reflect what is being taught today by Wilson.
I would greatly appreciate some clarity from those in here who have high discernment, for covenant theology and ecclessiology are topics I am just now being exposed to for the first time. Perhaps a review of this book in light of today's discussions would be helpful also.
Thank you for your time.
What about the book "Back to Basics", ed. by David Hagopian?
In light of the FV and NPP controversy, what are we to think of this book?
I am not in agreement with the FV or NPP. Is the perspective in this book the precursor to these movements? Or are these movements a straying from what is proclaimed in this book?
This concerns me since the FV proponents have now been found to use orthodox lanaguage with heterodox meanings. Added to this that Sproul, Bridges, Adams, Beisner, Boice, and others recommend it with Sproul giving a foreword. Have these men been duped and are now recanting their praise of this book? Or is this book orthodox and different from the controversy today?
In the judgment of charity I'm assuming this book does not reflect what is being taught today by Wilson.
I would greatly appreciate some clarity from those in here who have high discernment, for covenant theology and ecclessiology are topics I am just now being exposed to for the first time. Perhaps a review of this book in light of today's discussions would be helpful also.
Thank you for your time.