reformedcop
Puritan Board Freshman
I would like to pose a question regarding the authority to preach. A brother and I have been having a friendly argument on this matter. He would say that any man who has the desire or calling to preach/proclaim the Gospel in the public square (e.g. a street preacher) should be able to. My position is that a man should be examined and ordained before he should be able to preach in the public square.
In the course of the argument my friend has brought forward some proofs, some of which I find compelling, others not so much.
His most compelling proofs are Apollos:
Another pretty good argument for his position was in Luke 9:49-50:
And a third argument he gives is the 70 disciples found in Luke 10.
What say you? Are these good arguments for allowing a possibly unsent, unexamined man to preach in the open air? I am fully aware that there are many rogue “preachers” out on the streets in this country who don’t submit to any type of church authority. For the sake of this discussion, I would like to talk about those who are part of a church and submit to its authority.
In the course of the argument my friend has brought forward some proofs, some of which I find compelling, others not so much.
His most compelling proofs are Apollos:
And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus. This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John. And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly. And when he was disposed to pass into Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him: who, when he was come, helped them much which had believed through grace: For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ. {Christ: or, is the Christ}
Another pretty good argument for his position was in Luke 9:49-50:
And said unto them, Whosoever shall receive this child in my name receiveth me: and whosoever shall receive me receiveth him that sent me: for he that is least among you all, the same shall be great. And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him, because he followeth not with us. And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.
And a third argument he gives is the 70 disciples found in Luke 10.
What say you? Are these good arguments for allowing a possibly unsent, unexamined man to preach in the open air? I am fully aware that there are many rogue “preachers” out on the streets in this country who don’t submit to any type of church authority. For the sake of this discussion, I would like to talk about those who are part of a church and submit to its authority.