Justified
Puritan Board Sophomore
If man is made in the image of God at creation, and part of that image consists in the indwelling of the Spirit, how does one avoid the conclusion that the Covenant of Works is not supperadded, but rather per Kline is natural to man?
Furthermore, at the recent Reformed Forum conference (I didn't go but some of my friends told me about it), some of the speakers thought that, not only should it be said that man is made in true knowledge, righteousness, and holiness insofar as he is in the image of God, but also it should be said that he was made in union and communion with his Creator.
How do both of these claims square with WCF 7.1? I am trying to think of an anthropology that does not imply Klinean Covenant Theology.
Furthermore, at the recent Reformed Forum conference (I didn't go but some of my friends told me about it), some of the speakers thought that, not only should it be said that man is made in true knowledge, righteousness, and holiness insofar as he is in the image of God, but also it should be said that he was made in union and communion with his Creator.
How do both of these claims square with WCF 7.1? I am trying to think of an anthropology that does not imply Klinean Covenant Theology.