JohnGill
Puritan Board Senior
ICR and AIG have articles on this issue. You might also look up Halton Arp. He disproved the idea of Redshift-Blueshift. Almost everything that "scientists" claim proves billions of years has been disproven.
Radiometric Dating - based of 3 faulty assumptions
1. Constant decay rate of radiometric isotopes (disproved by nuclear catalysis and photoremediation)
2. The belief that there was no daughter element. Mt. St. Helens disproved it
3. The belief the area remained undisturbed for billions of years.
Ice Core dating was disproven by WWII planes left on Greenland. According to Ice Core dating WWII occurred 100,000 yrs ago. C-14 dating has similar issues. Moon silt, ocean salinity, recent lava flows which were radiometrically dated all end up disproving the billions of years myth. So the idea of there having been billions of years has no evidence. Unless one is willing to believe that when we know the age of a rock radiometric dating is wrong and when we dont know the age of a rock, it's correct. The best book I've read on the issue is Shattering the Myths of Darwinism. Wasn't written by a Christian but a science journalist. Refutes it pretty soundly.
Hope this helps some.
It also helps to remember that billions of years nonsense is necessary for evolution. Has nothing scientific behind it.
Radiometric Dating - based of 3 faulty assumptions
1. Constant decay rate of radiometric isotopes (disproved by nuclear catalysis and photoremediation)
2. The belief that there was no daughter element. Mt. St. Helens disproved it
3. The belief the area remained undisturbed for billions of years.
Ice Core dating was disproven by WWII planes left on Greenland. According to Ice Core dating WWII occurred 100,000 yrs ago. C-14 dating has similar issues. Moon silt, ocean salinity, recent lava flows which were radiometrically dated all end up disproving the billions of years myth. So the idea of there having been billions of years has no evidence. Unless one is willing to believe that when we know the age of a rock radiometric dating is wrong and when we dont know the age of a rock, it's correct. The best book I've read on the issue is Shattering the Myths of Darwinism. Wasn't written by a Christian but a science journalist. Refutes it pretty soundly.
Hope this helps some.
It also helps to remember that billions of years nonsense is necessary for evolution. Has nothing scientific behind it.