Eoghan
Puritan Board Senior
I am curious as to why the Jews and Gentiles make common cause against Paul and Barnabus. In Acts 13 v50 we read that it was the Jewish women of note and the prominent men of the city who persecuted Paul and drove them out of their district.
Now in Acts 14 v19 they come to Iconium and "win over" the gentiles to stone Paul.
What is it that is so upsetting? For the Jews, those who believe there is no problem. For the unbelieving Jews however there is a problem. Their religion casts them on the moral high ground. They look down on others and to some extent have others look up to them. They have the chief seats in the synagogue as a right. Now Paul comes along and takes the fan base away.
For the Gentiles there is a set order of things with the rulers at the top. Again there is respect for these officials and these officials expect respect. There is a top down heirarchy. Paul undermines that by his preaching.
I think it was Calvin who was charged with revolution (?) for making the ploughboy as able to judge the rights and wrongs of matters as the civil magistrate (QUOTATION NEEDED).
Again and again it is JEALOUSY that is said to cause these outbreaks of persecution. Jealous of what?
Anyone else care care to shed some insight into the opposition encountered?
I was thinking it might be concern about Paul leading the proselytes astray, i.e. concern for their souls. I do have to keep reminding myself that the Jews who were genuinely spiritually aware would be the first to believe in Jesus. We also need to be aware of the effect on the economy of the spread ofd Christianity. Recall that it was the "idol makers and allied trades" that opposed Paul at Ephesus (Acts 19). Even today the call to "spend, spend, spend" to stimulate the economy, runs counter to Christian concepts of thrift. If the state ever counts up the financial giving to foreign missions that sees money "lost" to the economy...
I am trying to think as an actor p) if I was portraying either Jew or Gentile opposition what would my motivation be?
Now in Acts 14 v19 they come to Iconium and "win over" the gentiles to stone Paul.
What is it that is so upsetting? For the Jews, those who believe there is no problem. For the unbelieving Jews however there is a problem. Their religion casts them on the moral high ground. They look down on others and to some extent have others look up to them. They have the chief seats in the synagogue as a right. Now Paul comes along and takes the fan base away.
For the Gentiles there is a set order of things with the rulers at the top. Again there is respect for these officials and these officials expect respect. There is a top down heirarchy. Paul undermines that by his preaching.
I think it was Calvin who was charged with revolution (?) for making the ploughboy as able to judge the rights and wrongs of matters as the civil magistrate (QUOTATION NEEDED).
Again and again it is JEALOUSY that is said to cause these outbreaks of persecution. Jealous of what?
Anyone else care care to shed some insight into the opposition encountered?
I was thinking it might be concern about Paul leading the proselytes astray, i.e. concern for their souls. I do have to keep reminding myself that the Jews who were genuinely spiritually aware would be the first to believe in Jesus. We also need to be aware of the effect on the economy of the spread ofd Christianity. Recall that it was the "idol makers and allied trades" that opposed Paul at Ephesus (Acts 19). Even today the call to "spend, spend, spend" to stimulate the economy, runs counter to Christian concepts of thrift. If the state ever counts up the financial giving to foreign missions that sees money "lost" to the economy...
I am trying to think as an actor p) if I was portraying either Jew or Gentile opposition what would my motivation be?