Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Day of the Lord is an event of judgment and punishment and destruction, the Lord will come and will destroy the wicked ones and "and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." then the living and the dead will be judged, and after the judgment there will be a New Heaven and a New earth.It seems the Day of the Lord mentioned in 2 Ptr 3:10 would be synonymous with the Day of the Lord in Zch 14. In Zch 14:4 His feet are standing on the Mount of Olives, from where He departed and will return in like manner. Zch 14 begins with "behold the Day of the Lord commeth," and is followed by at least 7 more "in that day" modifiers to all the events occurring in that day.
...
Of course, this gives us a challenge in regard to "the day of the Lord" as well, for it has the article. ...
...
Of course, this gives us a challenge in regard to "the day of the Lord" as well, for it has the article. ...
Does "that" in "that day" cause the same issue?
"that day" follows "Day of the Lord" many times and often has obvious association to the Lord's return, even when not co-located with "the Day of the Lord." (Just one example, 2 Tim 4:8 "in that day...who love His appearing.")
Thanks for the question, Wannabee, it allows me to get away from the 1000 years = 1 day issue, I've repeated myself too much and I don't think we are going anywhere thereWannabee said:My question in response would be, "How do you deal with the fact that "thousand years" in Rev. 20 has an article before it?" Not every time, but it happens and needs to be dealt with exegetically. As I referenced earlier, this lends precision in the Greek and should be dealt with by any who deny the possibility of a literal millennium.
The reasons why I moved away from premillennialism have to do with the inconsistencies found with a "literal" interpretation or Rev. 20 with the rest of the eschatological teachings found in the New Testament. When I started studying eschatology more in-depth I found that a postmil or amil position is more consistent with the general teaching of the Bible and the book of Revelation. I also found out that many of the things that I was taught about the millennium in Rev 20 were assumptions and are not in the text.Wannabee said:With this in mind, is there anything in Revelation 20 to give us the idea that "the thousand years" is idiomatic. Since it's the only place where such language is used, I don't see how we could draw this conclusion. Of course, that has much to do with why I'm premil.