There are different models for preaching currently being promoted within the church, including the Reformed segment. So I propose a test case.
[KJV]Leviticus 12[/KJV]
How would a redemptive-historical preacher preach this? (Think Edmund Clowney)
How would a reformed experiential preacher preach this? (Think Joel Beeke)
How would a practical preacher preach this? (Think Albert Martin)
How would a puritan-style preacher this? (Not sure who to put here)
I know the outline would be:
Text: _________________________________
Doctrine: ______________________________
Uses: _________________________________
But what would you put to fill in the blanks?
How would an expository preacher preach this? (Think Rick Phillips)
(Now please, the purpose of the thread isn't to argue about nomenclature or what is better, and I certainly hope that there is overlap among the categories. But if you hold to one or the other of these styles of preaching, or if you think you have a pretty decent handle on them, give me your take: what would each different style of preaching make with this text?)
[KJV]Leviticus 12[/KJV]
How would a redemptive-historical preacher preach this? (Think Edmund Clowney)
How would a reformed experiential preacher preach this? (Think Joel Beeke)
How would a practical preacher preach this? (Think Albert Martin)
How would a puritan-style preacher this? (Not sure who to put here)
I know the outline would be:
Text: _________________________________
Doctrine: ______________________________
Uses: _________________________________
But what would you put to fill in the blanks?
How would an expository preacher preach this? (Think Rick Phillips)
(Now please, the purpose of the thread isn't to argue about nomenclature or what is better, and I certainly hope that there is overlap among the categories. But if you hold to one or the other of these styles of preaching, or if you think you have a pretty decent handle on them, give me your take: what would each different style of preaching make with this text?)