DonP
Puritan Board Junior
Are there actually any translations that we would consider heresy?
Not if one doesn't have a "standard" by which to examine them.
Well even if we used a general consensus of the versions we have the TEV would be heresy.
From wiki
The GNB has been challenged as to the degree of accuracy one of the translators maintained to the Greek texts.[citation needed] Concern was raised after Robert Bratcher made public statements questioning the inerrancy and inspiration of scripture in March 1981, as well as deriding those who hold to such views as dishonest or wilfully ignorant. Many people believe that Bratcher's viewpoints unduly influenced what was written into the GNB. His speech so outraged many churches that they withheld monetary donations to the American Bible Society, a move that nearly bankrupted the ABS. The ABS requested Bratcher's resignation later that year.[5]
Further statements from Bratcher and subsequent investigation of the GNB cause some to believe that it weakens or undermines other key doctrines, such as the virgin birth of Christ; it failed the "Isaiah 7.14 litmus test" that had been used by conservative Christians since the publication of the Revised Standard Version in 1952 (see Revised Standard Version#Reception and controversy).