Hi all -
Not sure if anyone has seen this video, but my question essentially revolves around the Orthodox Preists' rationale for how others can fall into Nestorianism.
I've studied a lot of church history, and I've had a hard time figuring out the correct middle ground with Nestorianism.
Let's use for example the fact that Jesus did not know the time of his return. i have seen a lot of theologians say this is because this was the "human side" of Christ. How do we allow for this? Isn't this Nestorianism and separating the two natures? This, along with dyothelitism, seem tricky for me. The other approaches I've heard falls more into eutychianism so I'm really confused on how to probably think about the two natures. Hope this makes sense. Thanks!
Not sure if anyone has seen this video, but my question essentially revolves around the Orthodox Preists' rationale for how others can fall into Nestorianism.
I've studied a lot of church history, and I've had a hard time figuring out the correct middle ground with Nestorianism.
Let's use for example the fact that Jesus did not know the time of his return. i have seen a lot of theologians say this is because this was the "human side" of Christ. How do we allow for this? Isn't this Nestorianism and separating the two natures? This, along with dyothelitism, seem tricky for me. The other approaches I've heard falls more into eutychianism so I'm really confused on how to probably think about the two natures. Hope this makes sense. Thanks!