Top 5-10 Romans commentaries

Status
Not open for further replies.
Timotheos

Timotheos

Puritan Board Freshman
Just wanted to hear you all weigh in on this. If you (a) were assigning a commentary for a course on Romans in seminary & (b) wanted 5-10 commentaries to consult for preaching or teaching, which would be #1 that you would demand your students to purchase and then rank the rest of them.
 
Stephen L Smith said:
Perhaps the greatest expository series done on Romans ws Martyn Lloyd-Jones majestic Romans series.Worth a listen https://www.mljtrust.org/free-sermons/book-of-romans/
Click to expand...

This makes me happy that MLJ got the first mention. His first sermon on Romans 6 practically changed my life (and the first on Romans 7 is just as good). When I moved back to Georgia from Chicago, my pastors bought me the 13-volume Romans series by MLJ as a going-away gift. I treasure it. MLJ is the best.
 
As a personal rule, though, I never trust that I have truly understood a passage until I have read Calvin's Commentary on said passage.
 
You guys are silly. If the reading list was for a “seminary course“ expositional or practical level commentaries would rate no more than a supplemental reading. Even someone like him would only make it to a secondary reading list. There’s just been simply too much paradigm shifting scholarship that has transpired for me too leapfrog over it and pretend it didn’t happen. Only technical commentaries would be on the list. People in seminary need to learn how to engage with scholarship.
 
SolaScriptura said:
You guys are silly. If the reading list was for a “seminary course“ expositional or practical level commentaries would rate no more than a supplemental reading. Even someone like him would only make it to a secondary reading list. There’s just been simply too much paradigm shifting scholarship that has transpired for me too leapfrog over it and pretend it didn’t happen. Only technically commentaries would be on the list. People in seminary need to learn how to engage with scholarship.
Click to expand...

I've been to seminary. I'm fully aware of what is required. Thanks.
 
Taylor Sexton said:
This makes me happy that MLJ got the first mention. His first sermon on Romans 6 practically changed my life
Click to expand...
Glad to hear this Taylor. MLJ sermons have been literally life changing for me. As people will know, many of Dr Lloyd-Jones sermons are available on the MLJ Recording Trust website. The series on Romans, Ephesians, John etc are a blessing to the soul. https://www.mljtrust.org/sermons/

Few preachers have gripped me like the Doctor has.
 
SolaScriptura said:
You guys are silly. If the reading list was for a “seminary course“ expositional or practical level commentaries would rate no more than a supplemental reading.
Click to expand...
Silly? I doubt Spurgeon, Dr Lloyd-Jones or the Puritans would agree it you. If we want to talk about Seminary, Dr Joel Beeke is the President of an esteemed Seminary. He constantly argues for scholarship and piety. Thus I believe Dr Beeke would assign a expositional commentary as well as an academic commentary.

SolaScriptura said:
Even someone like him would only make it to a secondary reading list.
Click to expand...
Not in a seminary that emphasises piety as well as scholarship

SolaScriptura said:
People in seminary need to learn how to engage with scholarship.
Click to expand...
Did Paul say "and my speech and my message were based on the very latest scholarship" in 1 Cor 2?

Far from it!
He said "and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God."

This is not to undermine the importance of scholarship. It is noteworthy that MLJ himself based his expositions on Romans on the latest scholarship (he read Barth and Brunner etc) but he emphasised that the church needs to get back to what Paul said in 1 Cor 2:3 ff.
 
I have been doing research on Romans commentaries as I plan on spending significant time studying it next year. The one's I am going to use are:
John Murray
Shedd
John Brown of Edinburgh
Calvin
Haldane
And probably Schreiner's new one.
 
Stephen L Smith said:
Glad to hear this Taylor. MLJ sermons have been literally life changing for me. As people will know, many of Dr Lloyd-Jones sermons are available on the MLJ Recording Trust website. The series on Romans, Ephesians, John etc are a blessing to the soul. https://www.mljtrust.org/sermons/

Few preachers have gripped me like the Doctor has.
Click to expand...
I can't speak highly enough of the Doctor. I spent a year listening to sermons as I opened my restaurant, M-F. It was life-changing. I am reading his two-volume biography right now. It is bringing me great encouragement. I plan on starting his Romans series after I finish his sermons on Ephesians.
 
My top ten are as follows, in no particular order: Cranfield (ICC), Moo (NICNT, now in a second edition), Nygren, Boice, Shedd, Lloyd-Jones, Schreiner (now in a second edition), Murray, Haldane, Calvin.
 
greenbaggins said:
My top ten are as follows, in no particular order: Cranfield (ICC), Moo (NICNT, now in a second edition), Nygren, Boice, Shedd, Lloyd-Jones, Schreiner (now in a second edition), Murray, Haldane, Calvin.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... Is it time to update your list on greenbaggins?
 
Stephen L Smith said:
Silly? I doubt Spurgeon, Dr Lloyd-Jones or the Puritans would agree it you. If we want to talk about Seminary, Dr Joel Beeke is the President of an esteemed Seminary. He constantly argues for scholarship [you]and[/you] piety. Thus I believe Dr Beeke would assign a expositional commentary as well as an academic commentary.


Not in a seminary that emphasises piety as well as scholarship


Did Paul say "and my speech and my message were based on the very latest scholarship" in 1 Cor 2?

Far from it!
He said "and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God."

This is not to undermine the importance of scholarship. It is noteworthy that MLJ himself based his expositions on Romans on the latest scholarship (he read Barth and Brunner etc) but he emphasised that the church needs to get back to what Paul said in 1 Cor 2:3 ff.
Click to expand...

Ok.
 
Reformed Bookworm said:
I can't speak highly enough of the Doctor. I spent a year listening to sermons as I opened my restaurant, M-F. It was life-changing. I am reading his two-volume biography right now. It is bringing me great encouragement. I plan on starting his Romans series after I finish his sermons on Ephesians.
Click to expand...
I say Amen to all this Robert. The 2 volume biography was also life changing for me. I cannot praise it too highly! You will also enjoy "Martyn Lloyd-Jones: messanger of grace" also by Iain Murray.
 
Stephen L Smith said:
I say Amen to all this Robert. The 2 volume biography was also life changing for me. I cannot praise it too highly! You will also enjoy "Martyn Lloyd-Jones: messanger of grace" also by Iain Murray.
Click to expand...
Glad to hear it! Thanks for the recommendation. I will add it to my queue. Sorry to hijack the thread and turn it into one about MLJ.
 
Last edited:
I truly believe the Holy Spirit used MLJ's writings and sermons to contribute mightily to my salvation. He preached at the Hawthorne Gospel Church in north NJ a few years before I first came to believe, and I availed myself of tapes of those sermons shortly thereafter.
Reading his Studies in the Sermon on the Mount was instrumental in increasing my faith, and I think everyone should read it. It was transcribed from sermons he gave shortly before they began the recordings.
I've been listening to his sermons on Romans one per night for awhile now, and I'm up to chapter 5. The commentaries he recommends so far are Hodge as well as Haldane.
 
If you were assigning commentaries for reading in a seminary class, you would assign the best critical commentaries that enable the student to best understand the meaning of the Greek text of Romans. The more doctrinal and devotional commentaries would, as Ben says, be recommended as supplementary readings.
 
My top would be a tie between Hodge and Haldane. From there I would also add Murray and Moo as well as Stott to make my top 5.
 
JimmyH said:
I truly believe the Holy Spirit used MLJ's writings and sermons to contribute mightily to my salvation. He preached at the Hawthorne Gospel Church in north NJ a few years before I first came to believe, and I availed myself of tapes of those sermons shortly thereafter.
Reading his Studies in the Sermon on the Mount was instrumental in increasing my faith, and I think everyone should read it. It was transcribed from sermons he gave shortly before they began the recordings.
I've been listening to his sermons on Romans one per night for awhile now, and I'm up to chapter 5. The commentaries he recommends so far are Hodge as well as Haldane.
Click to expand...

I think his Studies in the Sermon on the Mount (2 volumes: 1959, 1960; usually published as one volume now) is his best work. Recommended.
 
Reformed Covenanter said:
If you were assigning commentaries for reading in a seminary class, you would assign the best critical commentaries that enable the student to best understand the meaning of the Greek text of Romans. The more doctrinal and devotional commentaries would, as Ben says, be recommended as supplementary readings.
Click to expand...

Probably. But the point falls on deaf ears when it is made as rudely and insultingly as he did.
 
I'm in Romans 8 now in my series. Murray is the best by far and away. I also think there is a difference between reading a book in seminary and preparing to preach. I don't spend a lot of time with technical commentaries. I've been doing Greek for 31 years, so I don't need to wade through a bunch of dreck so the author can give me his insights on the aorist tense.
 
fredtgreco said:
I'm in Romans 8 now in my series. Murray is the best by far and away. I also think there is a difference between reading a book in seminary and preparing to preach. I don't spend a lot of time with technical commentaries. I've been doing Greek for 31 years, so I don't need to wade through a bunch of dreck so the author can give me his insights on the aorist tense.
Click to expand...

Just wondering, Fred, did you ever consult Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on Romans for your series? I read it recently (online here); there were plenty of good doctrinal observations (not so much on justification), but it was not that great exegetically.
 
greenbaggins said:
My top ten are as follows, in no particular order: Cranfield (ICC), Moo (NICNT, now in a second edition), Nygren, Boice, Shedd, Lloyd-Jones, Schreiner (now in a second edition), Murray, Haldane, Calvin.
Click to expand...

Nygren isn't actually a typical commentary, though, is it?
 
D.A. Carson's 'New Testament Commentary Survey' (5th edition 2001) lists 'best buys' for single Romans commentaries as;
D.J. Moo in NIC
T.Schreiner
C.E.B. Cranfield (for advanced students)
A. Nygren
The earlier version of 1993 lists best buys as;
Cranfield
Moo (wait for NIC)
F.F. Bruce
C.K. Barrett
A. Nygren

On Nygren he says, " One of the best for the theological flow of thought in Romans is the work of Anders Nygren (Fortress 1949) Everyone who can do so who can do so should grasp his general introductory remarks on pages 16-26. Unfortunately, however, the book is inadequate as a verse-by-verse commentary."

Carson covers all of the authors of commentaries on Romans with at least a gloss. Haldane gets an honorable mention, as well as Hodge. On John Murray, "will guide you stolidly with the heavy tread of the proverbial village policeman (although with more theology; and note especially the useful appendices and notes)"

On MLJ; "Lloyd-Jones is probably not the model most preachers should imitate, but the set is easy to read, and Lloyd-Jones sometimes offers material one is hard pressed to find elsewhere--in addition to the wealth of his practical application of Scripture."
 
JimmyH said:
D.A. Carson's 'New Testament Commentary Survey' (5th edition 2001) lists 'best buys' for single Romans commentaries as;
D.J. Moo in NIC
T.Schreiner
C.E.B. Cranfield (for advanced students)
A. Nygren
The earlier version of 1993 lists best buys as;
Cranfield
Moo (wait for NIC)
F.F. Bruce
C.K. Barrett
A. Nygren

On Nygren he says, " One of the best for the theological flow of thought in Romans is the work of Anders Nygren (Fortress 1949) Everyone who can do so who can do so should grasp his general introductory remarks on pages 16-26. Unfortunately, however, the book is inadequate as a verse-by-verse commentary."

Carson covers all of the authors of commentaries on Romans with at least a gloss. Haldane gets an honorable mention, as well as Hodge. On John Murray, "will guide you stolidly with the heavy tread of the proverbial village policeman (although with more theology; and note especially the useful appendices and notes)"

On MLJ; "Lloyd-Jones is probably not the model most preachers should imitate, but the set is easy to read, and Lloyd-Jones sometimes offers material one is hard pressed to find elsewhere--in addition to the wealth of his practical application of Scripture."
Click to expand...

Thanks for this!

Does he offer any extended comment on Cranfield?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

C
  • Locked
Romans 5:10
Replies
10
Views
2K
ExGentibus
ExGentibus
Clay7926
  • Locked
Good Commentaries on Romans
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
DanMcCormack
D
T
  • Locked
Romans 5:19
Replies
5
Views
3K
TylerRay
TylerRay
T
  • Locked
Romans 5:12
Replies
13
Views
5K
tmckinney
T
C
  • Locked
Romans 5:18
Replies
16
Views
3K
andreas
A
Back
Top