Ask Mr. Religion
Flatly Unflappable
In the rejection of "incredible" limited atonement, Dr. Craig complains the Reformed smuggle inference into interpretation of "the world" verses (e.g., 1 John 2:2) as opposed to the verses "prima facie" teaching. In the same breath he then smuggles his own notions of free will into his argument against limited atonement. Compounding this is his tip of the hat to the "astonishing power" of Molinism that could be used to support limited atonement, if a person were so inclined:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/limited-atonement
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/limited-atonement
Last edited: