The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Educational Forums > The Literary Forum > Recent Acquisitions

Recent Acquisitions A forum for describing and discussing your recent book acquisitions.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 06:08 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
33 Questions about American History You are not Supposed to ask!

Thomas Woods had earlier devastated the Leftwing/Neocon establishment with his Politically Incorrect Guide to American HistoryPolitically Incorrect Guide to American History . Not satisfied with an obvious intellectual win, he decided to rub it in with his newest book, 33 questions about American history you're not...33 questions about American history you're not... .

For the history student who is concerned with liberty and alarmed at the erosion of American historical consciousness, this is arguably our most powerful weapon. This book focuses your brain on the weak points of Left-Wing Neocon Trotsky Politics. To state it in other words, these questions can't be satisfactorily answered. To answer these questions is to concede the debate to the Paleocon.

But what does it matter what history teaches? This is the question Daryl Hart raised in a review of Lillback's biography on George Washington (I was shocked a historian asked this!). Simply, history is a form of philosophy on the offensive. The writing of history shapes a consciousness better than any erudite professorial discourse.

When Moses brought the people of Israel out of Egypt, they didn't simply "worship another god" when Moses was on the mountain. They did that, true, but the manner of their idolatry was a re-writing of history. Nowadays, our professors, along with some Christians, point to a secular basis and say, "Americans, behold thy gods that brought thee out of the land of Britain!" That is just one example of many.

Here is a "battle plan." If these questions are mastered and absorbed by sizable, influential numbers of the populace in key areas of the country, we would very well begin to see the sparks of liberty revived in America. Even if RP loses, which he probably will, too many Americans have seen the emperor naked. Too many Americans will have read Thomas Woods' book. After filet mignon, we are no longer satisfied with Big Macs.

Thomas E. Woods, Jr. - ThomasEWoods.com

Contents
Introduction Hoaxes and History
Chapter 1 Did the Founding Fathers support immigration?
Chapter 2 Did Martin Luther King Jr. oppose affirmative action?
Chapter 3 Were the American Indians really environmentalists?
Chapter 4 Were states' rights just code words for slavery and oppression?
Chapter 5 What was "the biggest unknown scandal of the Clinton years"?
Chapter 6 How wild was the "wild West"?
Chapter 7 How antiwar have American liberals really been over the years?
Chapter 8 Did the Iroquois Indians influence the United States Constitution?
Chapter 9 Did desegregation of schools significantly narrow the black-white educational achievement gap?
Chapter 10 Was the Civil War all about slavery, or was something else at stake as well?
Chapter 11 Can the president, on his own authority, send troops anywhere in the world he wants?
Chapter 12 Is it true that during World War II "Americans never had it so good"?
Chapter 13 How does Social Security really work?
Chapter 14 Was George Washington Carver really one of America's greatest scientific geniuses?
Chapter 15 Was the U.S. Constitution meant to be a "living, breathing" document that changes with the times?
Chapter 16 Did Indian wisdom help the Pilgrims grow corn?
Chapter 17 Who is most responsible for the "imperial presidency"?
Chapter 18 Is discrimination to blame for racial differences in income and job placement?
Chapter 19 Where did Thomas Jefferson's radical states' rights ideas come from?
Chapter 20 What really happened in the Whiskey Rebellion, and why will neither your textbook nor George Washington tell you?
Chapter 21 What made American wages rise? (Hint: it wasn't unions or the government.)
Chapter 22 Did capitalism cause the Great Depression?
Chapter 23 Did Herbert Hoover sit back and do nothing during the Great Depression?
Chapter 24 Did Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal lift the United States out of the Depression?
Chapter 25 Does the Constitution's commerce clause really grant the federal government the power to regulate all gainful activity?
Chapter 26 Does the Constitution authorize the federal government to do whatever it thinks will provide for the "general welfare" of Americans?
Chapter 27 Does the Constitution really contain an "elastic clause" that gives the federal government additional, unspecified powers?
Chapter 28 Did the Founding Fathers believe juries could refuse to enforce unjust laws?
Chapter 29 What do foreign-aid programs have to show for themselves?
Chapter 30 Did labor unions make Americans more free?
Chapter 31 Should Americans care about historians' rankings of the presidents?
Chapter 32 Who was S. B. Fuller?
Chapter 33 Did Bill Clinton really stop a genocide in Kosovo?
Conclusion Schools and Superstition

__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post:
Answerman (01-17-2008), Blue Tick (01-16-2008), Blueridge Baptist (01-16-2008), Craig (02-13-2008), Daniel Ritchie (01-17-2008), Davidius (01-16-2008), jaybird0827 (01-17-2008), KMK (01-16-2008), lololong (01-17-2008), Me Died Blue (01-17-2008), MrMerlin777 (01-16-2008)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 06:16 PM
a mere housewife's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,908
Thanks: 484
Thanked 415 Times in 260 Posts
Quote:
But what does it matter what history teaches? This is the question Daryl Hart raised in a review of Lillback's biography on George Washington (I was shocked a historian asked this!). Simply, history is a form of philosophy on the offensive. The writing of history shapes a consciousness better than any erudite professorial discourse.

When Moses brought the people of Israel out of Egypt, they didn't simply "worship another god" when Moses was on the mountain. They did that, true, but the manner of their idolatry was a re-writing of history. Nowadays, our professors, along with some Christians, point to a secular basis and say, "Americans, behold thy gods that brought thee out of the land of Britain!" That is just one example of many.
Jacob, that's very quotable. Thanks for the review.
__________________
Heidi
Indianapolis, Indiana

After two days, he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.
Let us know; let us press on to know the LORD; his going out is sure as the dawn; he will come to us as the showers, as the spring rains that water the earth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 06:59 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 2,660
Thanks: 271
Thanked 106 Times in 82 Posts
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Marysville. WA
Cascade Church (CRCNA)

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 09:13 AM
Me Died Blue's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 4,445
Thanks: 329
Thanked 127 Times in 66 Posts
Sounds good. The description also reminds me of Larry Elder's The Ten Things You Can't Say In America:

Quote:
1. Blacks Are More Racist than Whites
2. White Condescension Is as Bad as Black Racism
3. The Media Bias--It's Real, It's Widespread, It's Destructive
4. The Glass Ceiling--Full of Holes
5. America's Greatest Problem: Not Crime, Racism, or Bad Schools--It's Illegitimacy
6. There Is No Health-Care "Crisis"
7. America's Welfare State: The Tyranny of the Statist Quo
8. Republicans Versus Democrats--Maybe a Dime's Worth of Difference
9. The War Against Drugs Is Vietnam II: We're Losing This One, Too
10. Gun Control Advocates--Good Guys with Blood on Their Hands
__________________
Chris


A passion to know and reflect Christ by living and demonstrating the truth and richness of the historic Reformed faith

Visit My Website Here

Christopher Blum
Member of Riveroaks Reformed Presbyterian Church (PCA) in Germantown, TN
Currently attending Trinity Presbyterian Church of Northern Kentucky (PCA) in Burlington, KY

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 09:53 AM
BLD BLD is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 22
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
But what does it matter what history teaches? This is the question Daryl Hart raised in a review of Lillback's biography on George Washington (I was shocked a historian asked this!). Simply, history is a form of philosophy on the offensive. The writing of history shapes a consciousness better than any erudite professorial discourse.
Could you kindly supply some type of reference to the D.G. Hart review? I should like to read it (or listen to it or watch it or whatever).
__________________
Ben Dahlvang
BGC, St. Paul, MN

"The devil’s singing over me An age old song
That I am cursed and gone astray
Singing the first verse so conveniently
He’s forgotten the refrain
Jesus saves!" (Shane Barnard, Embracing Accusation)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 10:37 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
When Moses brought the people of Israel out of Egypt, they didn't simply "worship another god" when Moses was on the mountain. They did that, true, but the manner of their idolatry was a re-writing of history. Nowadays, our professors, along with some Christians, point to a secular basis and say, "Americans, behold thy gods that brought thee out of the land of Britain!" That is just one example of many.
Good point; there is no neutrality in historiography.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 11:35 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLD View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
But what does it matter what history teaches? This is the question Daryl Hart raised in a review of Lillback's biography on George Washington (I was shocked a historian asked this!). Simply, history is a form of philosophy on the offensive. The writing of history shapes a consciousness better than any erudite professorial discourse.
Could you kindly supply some type of reference to the D.G. Hart review? I should like to read it (or listen to it or watch it or whatever).
It was in a Modern Reformation issue concurrent with the release of Lillback's book. I read it at seminary and don't have the bibliographic info available (I no longer live in Jackson).
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post:
BLD (01-19-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 11:56 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne Beach, FL
Posts: 81
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Can you clarify "left wing neocon establishment"?

Politically the left-wing and neocons are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

I would think the neo-conservatives would love those books and have probably endorsed them in the likes of The Weekly Standard and Commentary magazines.
.
__________________
Michael Masztal
H.S. Science Teacher at Community Christian School, Melbourne, FL
Member, Chapel By The Sea, ARP
Melbourne Beach, FL

Last edited by MMasztal; 01-17-2008 at 12:13 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 04:14 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMasztal View Post
Can you clarify "left wing neocon establishment"?

Politically the left-wing and neocons are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

I would think the neo-conservatives would love those books and have probably endorsed them in the likes of The Weekly Standard and Commentary magazines.
.
Neocons hate Woods. For all their rhetoric, neocons and liberals have the same view of politics: centralization of power in the government. Liberals want big government at home. Neocons want big govt overseas. .
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 04:48 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 2,660
Thanks: 271
Thanked 106 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMasztal View Post
Can you clarify "left wing neocon establishment"?

Politically the left-wing and neocons are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

I would think the neo-conservatives would love those books and have probably endorsed them in the likes of The Weekly Standard and Commentary magazines.
.
Neocons hate Woods. For all their rhetoric, neocons and liberals have the same view of politics: centralization of power in the government. Liberals want big government at home. Neocons want big govt overseas. .
So......

Liberals taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Communist.
Neocons taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Globalist Corporate Fascists.

Does that sound about right? Or am I missing the picture entirely.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Marysville. WA
Cascade Church (CRCNA)

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 04:59 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMasztal View Post
Can you clarify "left wing neocon establishment"?

Politically the left-wing and neocons are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

I would think the neo-conservatives would love those books and have probably endorsed them in the likes of The Weekly Standard and Commentary magazines.
.
Neocons hate Woods. For all their rhetoric, neocons and liberals have the same view of politics: centralization of power in the government. Liberals want big government at home. Neocons want big govt overseas. .
So......

Liberals taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Communist.
Neocons taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Globalist Corporate Fascists.

Does that sound about right? Or am I missing the picture entirely.
That is close to Hayek's thesis in Road to Serfdom.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post:
MrMerlin777 (01-17-2008)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 05:09 PM
jaybird0827's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 3,327
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 738
Thanked 269 Times in 185 Posts
What about "Indians had bad immigration laws"?

__________________
~Jay~
Husband of ENS, father of J II. | Indian Trail, NC
Currently disabled due to health issues
Communicant Member, Precentor | Presbyterian Reformed Church of Charlotte, NC | Presbyterian Reformed Church
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:55 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 2,660
Thanks: 271
Thanked 106 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post

Neocons hate Woods. For all their rhetoric, neocons and liberals have the same view of politics: centralization of power in the government. Liberals want big government at home. Neocons want big govt overseas. .
So......

Liberals taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Communist.
Neocons taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Globalist Corporate Fascists.

Does that sound about right? Or am I missing the picture entirely.
That is close to Hayek's thesis in Road to Serfdom.
Would you recommend Road to Serfdom? If so where can I obtain it?
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Marysville. WA
Cascade Church (CRCNA)

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 07:07 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne Beach, FL
Posts: 81
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
[quote=Spear Dane;345793]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMasztal View Post
Can you clarify "left wing neocon establishment"?


Neocons hate Woods. For all their rhetoric, neocons and liberals have the same view of politics: centralization of power in the government. Liberals want big government at home. Neocons want big govt overseas. .
Neocons want big govt overseas?? I'm not sure where you got that idea. They realize we are in a global economy which might ruffle the feathers of the Pat Buchananites, but the economy is what it is.

The neocons won't cede any sovereignty to overseas govts or corps which is what I infer from your post.
__________________
Michael Masztal
H.S. Science Teacher at Community Christian School, Melbourne, FL
Member, Chapel By The Sea, ARP
Melbourne Beach, FL
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 07:47 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
[quote=MMasztal;345882]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMasztal View Post
Can you clarify "left wing neocon establishment"?


Neocons hate Woods. For all their rhetoric, neocons and liberals have the same view of politics: centralization of power in the government. Liberals want big government at home. Neocons want big govt overseas. .
Neocons want big govt overseas?? I'm not sure where you got that idea. They realize we are in a global economy which might ruffle the feathers of the Pat Buchananites, but the economy is what it is.

The neocons won't cede any sovereignty to overseas govts or corps which is what I infer from your post.
Yes, the neocons want to engage in nation-building overseas. But more importantly, neocons, along with leftists, see the State as a quasi-Messiah. If I can find it, a neocon at the 2004 RNC gave a speech which placed Bush on the throne of God (almost literally speaking...I will try to dig that up).

Of course, leftists believe the exact same things, just different characters.

I am not a Buchananite. I have issues with Pat on a few points.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 07:50 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,869
Thanks: 860
Thanked 764 Times in 473 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 View Post

So......

Liberals taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Communist.
Neocons taken to their logical conclusion are essentially Globalist Corporate Fascists.

Does that sound about right? Or am I missing the picture entirely.
That is close to Hayek's thesis in Road to Serfdom.
Would you recommend Road to Serfdom? If so where can I obtain it?
Here is the cartoon version.
The Illustrated Road to Serfdom
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post:
Craig (02-13-2008), MrMerlin777 (01-17-2008)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 08:06 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 2,660
Thanks: 271
Thanked 106 Times in 82 Posts
Interesting.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Marysville. WA
Cascade Church (CRCNA)

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump