The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Federal Vision/New Perspectives

Federal Vision/New Perspectives Discussion of the various innovations regarding justification (New Perspective on Paul, Federal Vision, Shepherdism)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 07:38 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,389
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,571
Thanked 1,969 Times in 1,096 Posts
Wilkins' Rationale, at GB

At GreenBaggins
Wilkins’s Rationale « Green Baggins
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
Westminster Letter Press
The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (02-02-2008), greenbaggins (02-02-2008), Stephen (02-02-2008)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2008, 10:05 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,566
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
I liked Lane's comment:

Quote:
As soon as it looks as though Wilkins will be put on trial, he leaves. In any case, he can no longer bear the name of “Machen,” since Machen faced his trial.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2008, 11:44 AM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
I find it amusing that Wilkins tries to make it look like he reached out to the PCA when in reality he was vindicated by his Presbytery and never charged. When did he every try to do this? This is what typically happens, people run when they think they will have to face discipline. Wilkins on one hand sounds so willing to submit to discipline but then he leaves the PCA. This does not sound very conciliatory to me.
__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2008, 02:46 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,566
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I find it amusing that Wilkins tries to make it look like he reached out to the PCA when in reality he was vindicated by his Presbytery and never charged. When did he every try to do this? This is what typically happens, people run when they think they will have to face discipline. Wilkins on one hand sounds so willing to submit to discipline but then he leaves the PCA. This does not sound very conciliatory to me.
Strange isn't it. Why didn't he join the CREC long ago instead of causing all this trouble?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:58 AM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I find it amusing that Wilkins tries to make it look like he reached out to the PCA when in reality he was vindicated by his Presbytery and never charged. When did he every try to do this? This is what typically happens, people run when they think they will have to face discipline. Wilkins on one hand sounds so willing to submit to discipline but then he leaves the PCA. This does not sound very conciliatory to me.
Strange isn't it. Why didn't he join the CREC long ago instead of causing all this trouble?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69