» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 138 | | 49 members and 89 guests | | Amazing Grace, austinww, awretchsavedbygrace, calvinich, ColdSilverMoon, Confessor, Covenant Joel, David J Houston, DMcFadden, Dragoon, greenbaggins, Greg, Grillsy, Grymir, J. David Kear, Jim Peet, MarieP, MMasztal, msortwell, NateLanning, nleshelman, Pergamum, Piano Hero, Puritan Sailor, raekwon, redmanca, refbaptdude, Rich Koster, sailorswife, satz, Scottish Lass, Soonerborn, timmopussycat, TimV, Titus35, toddpedlar, ubermadchen | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
03-07-2008, 12:32 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,054
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,414 Times in 834 Posts
| | | Update on LA Presbytery | 
03-07-2008, 02:31 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 970
Thanks: 148
Thanked 634 Times in 266 Posts
| | |
So...? Is there more to come in this case or is that it? That seems to be an anti-climactic conclusion if there is no more to follow. Forgive me if I have missed something.
| 
03-07-2008, 02:39 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,054
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,414 Times in 834 Posts
| | |
The climax was when the Presbytery pled guilty to the substance charge. Of course, there are still two FV sympathetic pastors in the Presbytery (Duane Garner and Mark Duncan). Furthermore, AAPC and Wilkins have left. There is nothing more to come.
| 
03-07-2008, 02:47 PM
|  | The BOOOOT | | Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,622
Thanks: 37
Thanked 164 Times in 111 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins The climax was when the Presbytery pled guilty to the substance charge. Of course, there are still two FV sympathetic pastors in the Presbytery (Duane Garner and Mark Duncan). Furthermore, AAPC and Wilkins have left. There is nothing more to come. | I would bet that there are folks over in the Carolina's that are cooking something up. | 
03-07-2008, 03:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,565
Thanks: 135
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | |
Can they cook something up for Missouri Presbytery or Pacific NW? Maybe a similar result could happen in quicker and nicer fashion.
| 
03-07-2008, 03:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins The climax was when the Presbytery pled guilty to the substance charge. Of course, there are still two FV sympathetic pastors in the Presbytery (Duane Garner and Mark Duncan). Furthermore, AAPC and Wilkins have left. There is nothing more to come. | Duane Garner is an elder at AAPC. I bet he is probably in the CREC now. To my knowledge he is neither a pastor nor a member of the LA PCA. http://auburnavenue.org/church_leaders.htm
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 04:05 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,600
Thanks: 3,593
Thanked 1,317 Times in 758 Posts
| | |
What is an 'FV sympathizer'? Is it someone who agrees with FV, or someone who does not agree but doesn't think it is that big of a deal?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 04:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | Garner has already left LaP Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins The climax was when the Presbytery pled guilty to the substance charge. Of course, there are still two FV sympathetic pastors in the Presbytery (Duane Garner and Mark Duncan). Furthermore, AAPC and Wilkins have left. There is nothing more to come. | Actually, Lane, Duane has left.
As of the Feb. 9 LaP meeting, which I discussed in my piece " LaP Hardens," he was there, and the comments on that focus on him taking me to task over whether LaP could get a "fair" trial at SJC.
But he withdrew the next day. The LaP has not met since his withdrawal.
Sorry for not keeping you posted on that.
Last edited by HaigLaw; 03-07-2008 at 04:49 PM.
Reason: correct typo - said SJP; should have been SJC - and runon sentence
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 04:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK What is an 'FV sympathizer'? Is it someone who agrees with FV, or someone who does not agree but doesn't think it is that big of a deal? | When I was in grad school it was someone who did not pronounce Shibboleth correctly. It wasn't good enough just to say FV was wrong, you had to say they were heretical. Even if you said they were heretical, that didn't count if you also said Bahnsen is good, for example.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 06:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| |
Thanks, Lane for your work in this. I feel like you should have your own news show on CBS.
__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:
| 
03-07-2008, 06:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 Can they cook something up for Missouri Presbytery or Pacific NW? Maybe a similar result could happen in quicker and nicer fashion. |
Is there something happening in Pacific NW Presbytery? I was not aware of anything, but then there are pockets of this everywhere.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins The climax was when the Presbytery pled guilty to the substance charge. Of course, there are still two FV sympathetic pastors in the Presbytery (Duane Garner and Mark Duncan). Furthermore, AAPC and Wilkins have left. There is nothing more to come. | Actually, Lane, Duane has left.
As of the Feb. 9 LaP meeting, which I discussed in my piece " LaP Hardens," he was there, and the comments on that focus on him taking me to task over whether LaP could get a "fair" trial at SJC.
But he withdrew the next day. The LaP has not met since his withdrawal.
Sorry for not keeping you posted on that. | At one time the clerk of the AAPC session was also the clerk of LA Presbytery, so is he still in the PCA?
| 
03-07-2008, 06:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins The climax was when the Presbytery pled guilty to the substance charge. Of course, there are still two FV sympathetic pastors in the Presbytery (Duane Garner and Mark Duncan). Furthermore, AAPC and Wilkins have left. There is nothing more to come. | Actually, Lane, Duane has left.
As of the Feb. 9 LaP meeting, which I discussed in my piece " LaP Hardens," he was there, and the comments on that focus on him taking me to task over whether LaP could get a "fair" trial at SJC.
But he withdrew the next day. The LaP has not met since his withdrawal.
Sorry for not keeping you posted on that. | At one time the clerk of the AAPC session was also the clerk of LA Presbytery, so is he still in the PCA? | If you know who it specifically was, I might be able to help you. Normally if the clerk of the session remained in good standing membership with AAPC, it is likely that he went with them into the CREC and is no longer the moderator of the Presbytery. But I confess a degree of ignorance on these matters.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 Can they cook something up for Missouri Presbytery or Pacific NW? Maybe a similar result could happen in quicker and nicer fashion. |
Is there something happening in Pacific NW Presbytery? I was not aware of anything, but then there are pockets of this everywhere. | Several years ago the Pacific NW Presbytery tried Leithart's views, found them non-heretical and thus exonerated him. Andrew's comment has reference to the fact that Peter Leithart was (is? I don't know) in the Pac NW.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw
Actually, Lane, Duane has left.
As of the Feb. 9 LaP meeting, which I discussed in my piece " LaP Hardens," he was there, and the comments on that focus on him taking me to task over whether LaP could get a "fair" trial at SJC.
But he withdrew the next day. The LaP has not met since his withdrawal.
Sorry for not keeping you posted on that. | At one time the clerk of the AAPC session was also the clerk of LA Presbytery, so is he still in the PCA? | If you know who it specifically was, I might be able to help you. Normally if the clerk of the session remained in good standing membership with AAPC, it is likely that he went with them into the CREC and is no longer the moderator of the Presbytery. But I confess a degree of ignorance on these matters. | I believe his last name was Peabody.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
At one time the clerk of the AAPC session was also the clerk of LA Presbytery, so is he still in the PCA? | If you know who it specifically was, I might be able to help you. Normally if the clerk of the session remained in good standing membership with AAPC, it is likely that he went with them into the CREC and is no longer the moderator of the Presbytery. But I confess a degree of ignorance on these matters. | I believe his last name was Peabody. | Close enough. Since he is a good friend of mine, and a man of integrity, I don't really want to disclose names nor speak of him in an informal forum. I know who you are talking about. I am sure he went with the church when they switched denominations. But to be honest, I don't know. I haven't seen him in a while.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 Can they cook something up for Missouri Presbytery or Pacific NW? Maybe a similar result could happen in quicker and nicer fashion. |
Is there something happening in Pacific NW Presbytery? I was not aware of anything, but then there are pockets of this everywhere. | Several years ago the Pacific NW Presbytery tried Leithart's views, found them non-heretical and thus exonerated him. Andrew's comment has reference to the fact that Peter Leithart was (is? I don't know) in the Pac NW. | I did not realize this, Jacob. Thanks for the information. You are attending John Knox PCA. Were you there when Jeffrey Steele was still the teaching elder? He is now an Anglican Priest under N.T Wright. It was very sad. I wondered if any of the ruling elders who were on the session with him are still at Knox? Jeffrey left or was defrocked in 2005, I believe.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
Is there something happening in Pacific NW Presbytery? I was not aware of anything, but then there are pockets of this everywhere. | Several years ago the Pacific NW Presbytery tried Leithart's views, found them non-heretical and thus exonerated him. Andrew's comment has reference to the fact that Peter Leithart was (is? I don't know) in the Pac NW. | I did not realize this, Jacob. Thanks for the information. You are attending John Knox PCA. | Yes. Quote: |
Were you there when Jeffrey Steele was still the teaching elder?
| No. I visited there 3 1/2 years ago (or something like that) and that was the current pastor's first sunday. I then moved to Jackson for 2 years and eventually came back to live near Monroe, LA.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:35 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | |
Yes, Jacob you are correct on Peter Leithart. I checked the current PCA ministerial directory and he is still a member of Pacific NW Presbytery, but he is laboring out of bounds at St. Andrews College with the FV Pope, Doug Wilson. What a shame that the Presbytery never found his views to be problematic. You wonder who is in that Presbytery.
| 
03-07-2008, 06:53 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Yes, Jacob you are correct on Peter Leithart. I checked the current PCA ministerial directory and he is still a member of Pacific NW Presbytery, but he is laboring out of bounds at St. Andrews College with the FV Pope, Doug Wilson. What a shame that the Presbytery never found his views to be problematic. You wonder who is in that Presbytery. | I really don't wonder. The FV should have never gotten as big as it did. It is conceptually abstract and represents a microcosm of an already tiny group (e.g., the Reformed church). People should have ignored it from day one and it would have been relegated to obscurity. Instead, everyone wanted to be Luther and Machen and look what we got now.
Also, fwiw, even though I disagree with Dr Leithart on FV, I love most all of his works.
| 
03-07-2008, 07:08 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
If you know who it specifically was, I might be able to help you. Normally if the clerk of the session remained in good standing membership with AAPC, it is likely that he went with them into the CREC and is no longer the moderator of the Presbytery. But I confess a degree of ignorance on these matters. | I believe his last name was Peabody. | Close enough. Since he is a good friend of mine, and a man of integrity, I don't really want to disclose names nor speak of him in an informal forum. I know who you are talking about. I am sure he went with the church when they switched denominations. But to be honest, I don't know. I haven't seen him in a while. | The Stated Clerk of LA Presbytery was a Ruling Elder. He was also clerk of AAPC. He resigned as Stated Clerk of the Presbytery at the same time that the church withdrew and TE Wilkins withdrew.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 07:10 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Yes, Jacob you are correct on Peter Leithart. I checked the current PCA ministerial directory and he is still a member of Pacific NW Presbytery, but he is laboring out of bounds at St. Andrews College with the FV Pope, Doug Wilson. What a shame that the Presbytery never found his views to be problematic. You wonder who is in that Presbytery. | I really don't wonder. The FV should have never gotten as big as it did. It is conceptually abstract and represents a microcosm of an already tiny group (e.g., the Reformed church). People should have ignored it from day one and it would have been relegated to obscurity. Instead, everyone wanted to be Luther and Machen and look what we got now.
Also, fwiw, even though I disagree with Dr Leithart on FV, I love most all of his works. | I find it extremely interesting that the "high ecclesiology" of Rev. Leithart permits him to plant a church in another denomination whilst staying in the PCA. When the Committee for the Review of Presbytery Records raised this fact (which would have raised a storm had it been an OPC church that was being planted) the "be charitable" types shouted it down.
| 
03-07-2008, 07:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Yes, Jacob you are correct on Peter Leithart. I checked the current PCA ministerial directory and he is still a member of Pacific NW Presbytery, but he is laboring out of bounds at St. Andrews College with the FV Pope, Doug Wilson. What a shame that the Presbytery never found his views to be problematic. You wonder who is in that Presbytery. | I really don't wonder. The FV should have never gotten as big as it did. It is conceptually abstract and represents a microcosm of an already tiny group (e.g., the Reformed church). People should have ignored it from day one and it would have been relegated to obscurity. Instead, everyone wanted to be Luther and Machen and look what we got now.
Also, fwiw, even though I disagree with Dr Leithart on FV, I love most all of his works. | I find it extremely interesting that the "high ecclesiology" of Rev. Leithart permits him to plant a church in another denomination whilst staying in the PCA. When the Committee for the Review of Presbytery Records raised this fact (which would have raised a storm had it been an OPC church that was being planted) the "be charitable" types shouted it down. | I am not defending all his actions, I just like some of his works on literature, critqques of postmodernity, etc.
| 
03-07-2008, 07:30 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
I am not defending all his actions, I just like some of his works on literature, critqques of postmodernity, etc. | Jacob,
Never said you did. What you said was perfectly reasonable.
But my objection to Rev. Leithart stands.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 07:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,986
Thanks: 887
Thanked 824 Times in 512 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
I am not defending all his actions, I just like some of his works on literature, critqques of postmodernity, etc. | Jacob,
Never said you did. What you said was perfectly reasonable.
But my objection to Rev. Leithart stands. | | 
03-07-2008, 09:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | former/current stated clerks of LaP Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen At one time the clerk of the AAPC session was also the clerk of LA Presbytery, so is he still in the PCA? | You are speaking of my friend M. Dale Peacock. He went with his church into the CREC, and has resigned as stated clerk of the LaP (PCA).
The new stated clerk is Dr. James Jones, a TE, who was one of the witnesses for the prosecution at the SJC yesterday. The other prosecution witness is our current LaP moderator, Troy Richards, a RE, as I explain in my story, " LaP Admonished," posted today.
| 
03-07-2008, 09:24 PM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,412 Times in 741 Posts
| |
Wow, a lot of folks have friends involved in this. This must be tough for the PCA to be going through.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.
| 
03-07-2008, 09:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| |
Yeah, if we wrote off all friends with whom we disagree, we'd have no friends left. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 10:02 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,808
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,024 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Yeah, if we wrote off all friends with whom we disagree, we'd have no friends left.  | Very true. It is just heartbreaking when they once stood and now are gooning up the Gospel.
| 
03-07-2008, 11:03 PM
|  | Megerator | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,721
Thanks: 1,738
Thanked 950 Times in 791 Posts
| | |
Last I heard, Leithart re-submitted his views to the NW Presbytery after the decision at GA last summer. A committee was formed...
| 
03-08-2008, 12:32 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 82
Thanks: 13
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by turmeric Last I heard, Leithart re-submitted his views to the NW Presbytery after the decision at GA last summer. A committee was formed... | This is true. There are some posts on TE Stellman's blog.
__________________
Bob Mattes
Ruling Elder, Christ Church of Arlington (PCA), Arlington, VA Reformed Musings Blog
"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing." - Edmund Burke
"We old folks have to find our cushions and pillows in our tankards. Strong beer is the milk of the old." -Martin Luther | 
03-08-2008, 07:40 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | FV sympathizers? Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK What is an 'FV sympathizer'? Is it someone who agrees with FV, or someone who does not agree but doesn't think it is that big of a deal? |  This is an insightful question, and I appreciate the humor with which others have answered it, but I have chosen to deal with it seriously. In fact, I revised my current story on the LaP, to comment on this question.
I think if you read my original story on the Jan. 19 LaP meeting, you will get a sense of how some of the votes were subtly nuanced, with commissioners voting the same way for different reasons. Perhaps I was not subtly nuanced enough, as I got private correspondence from a friend of mine in an FV church, chiding me that there were commissioners at the Jan. 19 meeting voting in a perceivably anti-FV way, who really were pro-FV, but who were voting the way they did in order to protect the LaP vis a vis the SJC. That may be the case, somewhat, but I think not significantly. I think the over-arching point is that groups arrive at truth, or clarify truth, gradually, with different members getting it quicker than others.
Let's take a concrete example. Rev. Wilkins' associate pastor made a motion at the Jan. 19 meeting to disapprove Rev. Wilkins' FV views. He was hoping a negative vote would be construed as a "vote of confidence" on Rev. Wilkins. That motion failed. I voted against it, not because I favored Rev. Wilkins' views, but because I felt the motion was out of order. The moderator had ruled it was in order, and I had not had the presence of mind to appeal the decision of the chair. Probably I would have lost that vote, if I had appealed it.
The point is -- there were subtle shades of issues. We got there gradually. Those of you from elsewhere who are so sure you are clearly pro-FV or clearly anti-FV have trouble understanding why we did this or that. The answer is, I think -- truth is a process, not having arrived fully.
| 
03-08-2008, 10:32 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
If you know who it specifically was, I might be able to help you. Normally if the clerk of the session remained in good standing membership with AAPC, it is likely that he went with them into the CREC and is no longer the moderator of the Presbytery. But I confess a degree of ignorance on these matters. | I believe his last name was Peabody. | Close enough. Since he is a good friend of mine, and a man of integrity, I don't really want to disclose names nor speak of him in an informal forum. I know who you are talking about. I am sure he went with the church when they switched denominations. But to be honest, I don't know. I haven't seen him in a while. | That is fine, brother. I do not want to put you in a awkard sitution. I have never met him, but knew only of his connection in this.
| 
03-08-2008, 10:39 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Yes, Jacob you are correct on Peter Leithart. I checked the current PCA ministerial directory and he is still a member of Pacific NW Presbytery, but he is laboring out of bounds at St. Andrews College with the FV Pope, Doug Wilson. What a shame that the Presbytery never found his views to be problematic. You wonder who is in that Presbytery. | I really don't wonder. The FV should have never gotten as big as it did. It is conceptually abstract and represents a microcosm of an already tiny group (e.g., the Reformed church). People should have ignored it from day one and it would have been relegated to obscurity. Instead, everyone wanted to be Luther and Machen and look what we got now.
Also, fwiw, even though I disagree with Dr Leithart on FV, I love most all of his works. | I find it extremely interesting that the "high ecclesiology" of Rev. Leithart permits him to plant a church in another denomination whilst staying in the PCA. When the Committee for the Review of Presbytery Records raised this fact (which would have raised a storm had it been an OPC church that was being planted) the "be charitable" types shouted it down. | I have real concerns for the PCA when they start doing this kind of thing. We can surmise that issues of worship or women in leadership will split the denomination, but these kind of actions is what led to the demise of the old PCUS. The "be charitable" types are more of a threat to the unity of the church than the so-called TR's (which I am happy to be a member of that club
Last edited by Stephen; 03-08-2008 at 10:51 AM.
Reason: spelling error
| 
03-08-2008, 10:42 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen At one time the clerk of the AAPC session was also the clerk of LA Presbytery, so is he still in the PCA? | You are speaking of my friend M. Dale Peacock. He went with his church into the CREC, and has resigned as stated clerk of the LaP (PCA).
The new stated clerk is Dr. James Jones, a TE, who was one of the witnesses for the prosecution at the SJC yesterday. The other prosecution witness is our current LaP moderator, Troy Richards, a RE, as I explain in my story, " LaP Admonished," posted today. | Thanks, brother. The sad thing in all of this is it puts friends we love on the wrong side of the issue. We all find ourselves in similar situations.
| 
03-08-2008, 10:48 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by turmeric Last I heard, Leithart re-submitted his views to the NW Presbytery after the decision at GA last summer. A committee was formed... |
I hope not another committee to find him in conformity with the Westminster Standards. I sometimes wonder why these Presbyteries or members of Presbyteries do not leave the denomination or at least throw out the standards. Little by little they keep chipping away at our confession until nothing is left.  I would encourage everyone to read Dr. Morton Smith's excellent book, How The Gold Has Become Dim.
| 
03-08-2008, 10:53 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Musings Quote:
Originally Posted by turmeric Last I heard, Leithart re-submitted his views to the NW Presbytery after the decision at GA last summer. A committee was formed... | This is true. There are some posts on TE Stellman's blog. |  I love the quote from Luther. The older I get the more I crave the beer over the milk | 
03-08-2008, 11:56 AM
|  | Megerator | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,721
Thanks: 1,738
Thanked 950 Times in 791 Posts
| | |
Question for Haiglaw; Did you really mean to say that "truth is a process"?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to turmeric For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2008, 12:35 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | Imperfect perceptions of truth Quote:
Originally Posted by turmeric Question for Haiglaw; Did you really mean to say that "truth is a process"? | Yes, in the sense we are all sinful and fallible and non-omniscient.
Jesus Christ is Truth incarnate, and the Word of God written is inerrant.
But our perceptions of Truth are in the process of sanctification, just like everything else about us. Paul said he had not arrived, he was continuing the course, he was fighting the good fight.
That was what I meant.  Make sense?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post: | | 
03-08-2008, 01:56 PM
|  | Megerator | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,721
Thanks: 1,738
Thanked 950 Times in 791 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Quote:
Originally Posted by turmeric Question for Haiglaw; Did you really mean to say that "truth is a process"? | Yes, in the sense we are all sinful and fallible and non-omniscient.
Jesus Christ is Truth incarnate, and the Word of God written is inerrant.
But our perceptions of Truth are in the process of sanctification, just like everything else about us. Paul said he had not arrived, he was continuing the course, he was fighting the good fight.
That was what I meant.  Make sense? | Yes, thanks!
BTW, as a PCA member in the NW, I would like to request prayer for our presbytery that it would make a wise diecision re; Leithart which will protect us from FV but also be fair to Rev. Leithart. (I haven't read him, so don't have a formed opinion, but I do have an opinion re; FV).
| | The Following User Says Thank You to turmeric For This Useful Post: | |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |