The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Federal Vision/New Perspectives

Federal Vision/New Perspectives Discussion of the various innovations regarding justification (New Perspective on Paul, Federal Vision, Shepherdism)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2008, 10:50 PM
py3ak's Avatar
El Tirano
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,118
Thanks: 112
Thanked 516 Times in 325 Posts
Anne, what you say is true. And I think that confirms my original thesis. If seminary training doesn't guarantee competence it is absurd to point to Wilson's lack of it as an explanation for his incompetence. It's easy to shoot Wilson down on that score; but that technique fails when you come over to Leithart or Meyers or Jordan or Norm Shepherd. Not only that, but it's not too hard to make it backfire with a rhetorical appeal to the fact that it was the seminary trained theologians who opposed the apostolic preaching of Christ.

And that is why I think that heresy (and often error) is a moral, not an intellectual problem. Servetus seems to have been recognized as quite brilliant, after all.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2008, 11:07 PM
Davidius's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,002
Thanks: 641
Thanked 506 Times in 331 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post

While I firmly disagree with FV, I have trouble reading Robbins' stuff since the same man said Van Til denied the Trinity. So if we are calling someone a damnable heretic, and it comes from Robbins, forgive me if I take it with a grain of salt.


And yes, I do listen to John Robbins' lectures for profit on other topics.
Do you have a reference to his accusation that VanTil denied the Trinity because I have been on his mailing list and have never heard this before? I agree with you that he is not VanTillian but he is presuppositional. Robbins holds to the teachings of Gordon's Clark and certainly would oppose VanTil.
Read his booklet Van Til: The Man and the Myth
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics

This may explain the old adage about Baptists being Methodists with shoes, and Presbyterians being Baptists who can read. To round out the adage, Lutherans might qualify as Presbyterians who drink to excess, and Episcopalians as Lutherans who know when to say when. - D.G. Hart
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 06:12 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak View Post

And that is why I think that heresy (and often error) is a moral, not an intellectual problem. Servetus seems to have been recognized as quite brilliant, after all.
Heretics are usually those too smart for most of us. I ain't clever enough for their sophistries.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2008, 06:31 PM
Beoga's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 75
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
While I am under the impression FV theology is heretical (I have neither the time nor the brain power to really comprehend this mess), I was actually unimpressed by "Not Reformed At All." I may have to reread it again, but from what I remember though, it seemed like more than have the time was spent attacking the person of Doug Wilson. I walked away still not really understanding what Wilson actually believed and the solid critiques of those beliefs.
Of course, I walked away from skimming through most of Reformed is Not Enough thinking that was silly. Though I did think that Her Hand in Marriage was quite intriquing.
__________________
Brian Vandenburg
Attend Intown Presbyterian Church (PCA)
"The authority of the Holy Scripture, for which it ought to be believed, and obeyed, depends not upon the testimony of any man, or Church; but wholly upon God (who is truth itself) the author thereof: and therefore it is to be received, because it is the Word of God."-Westminster Confession of Faith
http://wittenberg1517.wordpress.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Beoga For This Useful Post:
Ivanhoe (02-02-2008)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64