The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Federal Vision/New Perspectives

Federal Vision/New Perspectives Discussion of the various innovations regarding justification (New Perspective on Paul, Federal Vision, Shepherdism)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 11:54 AM
Amazing Grace's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post

1) Do all FV proponents reside in the same presbytery? ie the Louisiana one?
No, it spans several denominations.

Quote:
2) Do they all belong to the same local church?
No.

Quote:
3) Are there any other presbyteries that have FV proponents in them?
Probably, although some in the OPC would be more interested in Shepherd than FV.


Now I am more confused...lol
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI

Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 12:10 PM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,363
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 98
Thanked 592 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post

1) Do all FV proponents reside in the same presbytery? ie the Louisiana one?
No, it spans several denominations.



No.

Quote:
3) Are there any other presbyteries that have FV proponents in them?
Probably, although some in the OPC would be more interested in Shepherd than FV.


Now I am more confused...lol
AG, it is very confusing and would probably take a few weeks of research to begin to get a grip on the dynamics.

One thing to keep in mind: Jordan, and many other critics, have no real standing to criticize a given Presbyterian body's disciplinary proceedings because they aren't members of that church. The PCA is proceeding according to its own order.

And another thing to consider: rhetoric's effectiveness is inversely proportional to level of invective. In other words, as a general rule, the more name-calling you hear, the less you should listen. I think this applies to all things, not just ecclesiastical matters.
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to victorbravo For This Useful Post:
Ivanhoe (01-19-2008)
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 01:57 PM
SEAGOON's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 129
Thanks: 7
Thanked 177 Times in 42 Posts
Just posted the following to Warfield:

Hi All,

Given that James Jordan's comments were posted here, its only right that his apology on Ron Gleason's blog also be posted.

Gentlemen,

I hereby ask your forgiveness for my several overheated posts over the last few days. I have deleted all but the first, which is the only thing I had any right to post to you; to wit: that there is nothing wrong with anyone's commenting on the public actions and behavior of certain parties in the PCA, behavior that is public and that some regard as shocking and scandalous.

I was out of line in my comments here, partly because the rhetoric I employed is not appropriate in a public blog, and partly because, being neither in the PCA nor a presbyterian, anything beyond a general expression of concern or horror at how these affairs are being conducted is inappropriate.

I allowed my friendship with persons I believe are being wrongfully persecuted to inflame my language, and I wrote in anger, and I should not have done so.

So, please forgive me for having troubled your waters, and be assured that it will not happen again.

Sincerely,

James B. Jordan
Gary Johnson has asked the rather important question if (as was the case with Reggie Kidd) Jordan will be issuing a personal apology to the men he strongly defamed such as R.C. Sproul, and the SJC.

Also, I'm wondering how these recent overheated posts differ substantialy from the prior pattern of defamations, which have included this piece published in Biblical Horizons which referred to "the Warfield List (where idiocy abounds)" and stated:
Quote:
"Strange’s essay is just a summary report of the OPC Committee report mentioned above. That Report is one of the most amazing series of mindless misreadings and outright deceptions that I think I have ever encountered. It is not far from the kind of internet theoporn that oozes from the Warfield List and other cybergutters. There is no way I’m going to bore you with all the evil contained in this report: If you are really interested, go to www.federalvision.com, where you can read the Report itself and then numerous essays pointing out its stupidities."
Do Allan Strange, the OPC, and the nearly 700 members of the Warfield List not qualify for an apology and a retraction as well?Your Servant in Christ,

Andy Webb

__________________
Pastor Andy Webb
Providence PCA, Fayetteville, NC
BUILDING OLD SCHOOL CHURCHES
"Providence is a Christian's diary, but not his Bible. Sometimes a bad cause prevails and gets ground; but it is not to be liked because it prevails. We must not think the better of what is sinful, because it is successful. This is no rule for our actions to be directed by." - Thomas Watson
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 02:25 PM
SEAGOON's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 129
Thanks: 7
Thanked 177 Times in 42 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post
OK presby's walk with me here before we run.

There is a ruling body called the Genral Assembly of the PCA. This is a group of delegates that determines guidelines for each regional/local presbetery, which then flows down to each congregation within the PCA. The GA is one unit which governs the world wide activities of the denomination correct?

NOw we have the LA presbytery being indicted by the GA for not taking action against the FV proponents.

1) Do all FV proponents reside in the same presbytery? ie the Louisiana one?

2) Do they all belong to the same local church?

3) Are there any other presbyteries that have FV proponents in them?

4) The SJC, are appointed as the final authority on all matters of doctrine and polity within the GA?
First I'd recommend you read Dr. Clark's excellent summary entitled "For those of you just tuning in" it really is intended to bring those new to the topic of the FV controversy up to date.

Also, the "Star" Reference was Jordan's ridiculous analogy to the "Star Chamber" of the English Monarchs. The Star Chamber was a special court stacked with the King's cronies that tried treason cases and was in essence the King's means of ensuring his political enemies were condemned to death.

As I said, read Clark's essay, but here are my short answers to your questions:

1,2&3) No, there are several PCA Presbyteries with FV proponents in them. They include Pacific Northwest, Missouri, and several others. The FV is an amalgamation of theological movements combining elements of Norman Shepherd's theology, the New Perspectives on Paul (Covenant Nomism), Anglo-Catholicism, post-theonomic, emergent/emerging church thought, and various strains of nominalism from Dutch and British sources along with a generous helping of "here's what I'm thinking today." It has been gathering momentum since 2002 and the AAPC conference. It's primary means of dissemination have been conferences, the internet, and, sadly, Seminaries.

Statistically, the number of FV men is tiny, but their influence has been magnified by the internet and because they've been partly successful in co-opting support from the moderate and liberal wings of Reformed churches. The appeal is "its our ox being gored today, but tomorrow it'll be yours!" That and the fact that Doug Wilson and his CREC have gotten behind the movement has made it a worldwide phenom in the Reformed world.

Also, sadly the more we respond, the more "air time" it gets. Another reason to stop discussing stuff with them, and just stick to discipline.

3) The SJC or Standing Judicial Commission, is a Permanent Commission of the PCA GA. It's members are proposed by the Presbyteries and elected on the floor of the GA. It's purpose is to try the cases referred to the GA as the final court of appeal. It is, in essence, our Supreme Court. Theologically, the majority of members of the court come from the Broadly Evangelical wing of the PCA, in fact our "big steeple" wing has had a lock on the membership of the SJC since its inception, so claims that these guys are in league with or in fact ARE "Strict Subscriptionist" "TRs" should be a source of nothing but humor.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SEAGOON For This Useful Post:
DMcFadden (01-19-2008), Quickened (01-19-2008)
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 09:05 AM
Quickened's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 597
Thanks: 236
Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post

1) Do all FV proponents reside in the same presbytery? ie the Louisiana one?
No, it spans several denominations.



No.

Quote:
3) Are there any other presbyteries that have FV proponents in them?
Probably, although some in the OPC would be more interested in Shepherd than FV.


Now I am more confused...lol
I just want to thank you brother for asking the questions that you did. I had some basic questions but you covered those and more. I am on the same level as you (it seems) in terms of understanding this all
__________________
Brian E
Attending Christ Reformed Baptist Church
Milwaukee, WI
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 09:34 AM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
It is not the Star Judicial Chamber either. It is the Standing Judicial Commission.
My understanding was that JBJ was likening the PCA's Commission with the Star Chamber.
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 09:38 AM
Quickened's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 597
Thanks: 236
Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Scott Clark View Post
Thank you sir! I read the first article and it was very helpful as an introduction to this! I will read the others as time permits
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 11:06 AM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,222
Blog Entries: 18
Thanks: 759
Thanked 641 Times in 395 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
It is not the Star Judicial Chamber either. It is the Standing Judicial Commission.
My understanding was that JBJ was likening the PCA's Commission with the Star Chamber.
Which is ironic given the unjust court of the ARC of Tyler Texas fame.
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice
The Blue Banner Archive

When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 12:04 PM
Zenas's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 81
Thanked 282 Times in 195 Posts
While I hope Mr. Jordan's apology is sincere, and I don't have reason to believe otherwise (I too get highly worked up and it's a sensitive issue for him), I think he definately owes an apology to Dr. Sproul.

The fact that it is understandable the people get worked up on sesnsitive issues does not mitigate the fact that it needs to be apologized for. I would be held to the same standard, and so should he.
__________________
Andrew DeShazo, Deacon, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"All of us stumble in many ways, but if anyone is never at fault in what he says, then he is mature, able to control his whole body."(James 3:2)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 01:05 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
McFadderator Minimizing
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 3,561
Thanks: 725
Thanked 1,078 Times in 646 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAGOON View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazing Grace View Post
OK presby's walk with me here before we run.

There is a ruling body called the Genral Assembly of the PCA. This is a group of delegates that determines guidelines for each regional/local presbetery, which then flows down to each congregation within the PCA. The GA is one unit which governs the world wide activities of the denomination correct?

NOw we have the LA presbytery being indicted by the GA for not taking action against the FV proponents.

1) Do all FV proponents reside in the same presbytery? ie the Louisiana one?

2) Do they all belong to the same local church?

3) Are there any other presbyteries that have FV proponents in them?

4) The SJC, are appointed as the final authority on all matters of doctrine and polity within the GA?
First I'd recommend you read Dr. Clark's excellent summary entitled "For those of you just tuning in" it really is intended to bring those new to the topic of the FV controversy up to date.

Also, the "Star" Reference was Jordan's ridiculous analogy to the "Star Chamber" of the English Monarchs. The Star Chamber was a special court stacked with the King's cronies that tried treason cases and was in essence the King's means of ensuring his political enemies were condemned to death.

As I said, read Clark's essay, but here are my short answers to your questions:

1,2&3) No, there are several PCA Presbyteries with FV proponents in them. They include Pacific Northwest, Missouri, and several others. The FV is an amalgamation of theological movements combining elements of Norman Shepherd's theology, the New Perspectives on Paul (Covenant Nomism), Anglo-Catholicism, post-theonomic, emergent/emerging church thought, and various strains of nominalism from Dutch and British sources along with a generous helping of "here's what I'm thinking today." It has been gathering momentum since 2002 and the AAPC conference. It's primary means of dissemination have been conferences, the internet, and, sadly, Seminaries.

Statistically, the number of FV men is tiny, but their influence has been magnified by the internet and because they've been partly successful in co-opting support from the moderate and liberal wings of Reformed churches. The appeal is "its our ox being gored today, but tomorrow it'll be yours!" That and the fact that Doug Wilson and his CREC have gotten behind the movement has made it a worldwide phenom in the Reformed world.

Also, sadly the more we respond, the more "air time" it gets. Another reason to stop discussing stuff with them, and just stick to discipline.

3) The SJC or Standing Judicial Commission, is a Permanent Commission of the PCA GA. It's members are proposed by the Presbyteries and elected on the floor of the GA. It's purpose is to try the cases referred to the GA as the final court of appeal. It is, in essence, our Supreme Court. Theologically, the majority of members of the court come from the Broadly Evangelical wing of the PCA, in fact our "big steeple" wing has had a lock on the membership of the SJC since its inception, so claims that these guys are in league with or in fact ARE "Strict Subscriptionist" "TRs" should be a source of nothing but humor.
Wow! That is exactly what I was looking for. Between this and Dr. Clark's blog, it makes sense now. Thank you!
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2008, 08:17 PM
holyfool33's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Holland MI
Posts: 145
Thanks: 10
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
I recently read that it is very sad to see men stoop so low but it just shows the bankruptcy of the system.
__________________
Aaron
Independent Baptist
Holland MI
Blog: earthdwell22.blogspot.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 06:59 AM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 751
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 164
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Unhappy good insight

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAGOON View Post
And yes, its always a conflict of sinful men vs. sinful men, the only difference between them being grace and the gospel, in and of themselves there usually isn't much difference and sometimes the "nice guys" are on the side of error. No one, for instance, argued that Machen was more of a "people person" than his opponents. In any event, Church discipline can be likened to the end of Old Yeller, its an awful, sad job but it has to be done.
I found the excerpt above helpful. Most of us don't have the stomach for this, but we have to wade through it anyway.
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64