» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 90 | | 27 members and 63 guests | | asc, Beoga, Blue Tick, Blueridge Believer, Brad, ChristianTrader, Curt, davidsuggs, Don, Dwimble, Grymir, Jeff_Bartel, Jen, JohnGill, MOSES, nleshelman, PuritanBouncer, satz, shackleton, toddpedlar | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
04-06-2008, 12:34 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | | The Federal Vision
...
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
Last edited by AV1611; 06-29-2008 at 01:52 PM.
| 
04-06-2008, 12:53 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
| | |
Two of my friends who like the FV wound up going Anglican, as the FV fits nicely within its doctrinal parameters.
To be honest, however, considering all the problems the CoE has within its ranks, the FV is fairly low on list. Might even be an improvement for some theologians in it, which is an unnerving thought.
__________________ Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas
Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood. The Ivy Vine (my blog) | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Gryphonette For This Useful Post: | | 
04-06-2008, 04:35 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote: |
There also appears to be a general belief in our final justification or judgement by our works, but not meritoriously, for these works are the gifts of God’s grace, produced by his Spirit in those who have faith in the Son of God, which is, after all, God’s new covenant promise to his people, writing his laws on our hearts and causing us to walk in his ways. Judgement on the basis of what we have done in this life, is after all, what the New Testament says -see for example Revelation 20.12. The place our good works have is taught in (among other passages) John 15.1-8: the Father looks at the branches (the disciples) of the vine (Christ) for fruit and if they don’t bear fruit, they are cut off and thrown away into the fire. The disciples bear fruit because they abide in Christ, and apart from him they can do nothing. By bearing much fruit, the disciples prove to be Christ’s disciples.
| The highlighted bit is damnable heresy. Just because they say they do not believe in merit does not mean that they do not believe in merit. This is clearly implying that good works are of the essence of faith - not the fruit of faith. On this basis, we are ultimately saved by our works of covenantal obedience, and not by the imputation of Christ's active obedience.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
| 
04-06-2008, 04:36 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphonette Two of my friends who like the FV wound up going Anglican, as the FV fits nicely within its doctrinal parameters.
To be honest, however, considering all the problems the CoE has within its ranks, the FV is fairly low on list. Might even be an improvement for some theologians in it, which is an unnerving thought. | Anything which teaches damnable heresy - under the pretext of being Reformed - is most certainly a grave danger. At least you definitely know the Liberals are not orthodox. These guys are more slippery.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
| 
04-06-2008, 05:10 PM
|  | Lackey | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 837
Thanked 911 Times in 539 Posts
| | |
You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened?
| 
04-06-2008, 06:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 548
Thanks: 66
Thanked 182 Times in 112 Posts
| | |
The FV may be "slippery" but it leads to error rather than necessarily being error in itself. Most of the confusion comes from a refusal of the FV to debate on confessional terms, not due to actual heresy itself.
I would agree with Gryphonette that if the C of E went FV it would be a move in the right direction. The majority of the C of E do not even believe in biblical authority.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England
"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
| 
04-06-2008, 08:56 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened? | Given FV's major emphasis on paedobaptism and covenant theology, it is doubtful you will see many FVers in Baptist churches. Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post: | | 
04-06-2008, 09:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphonette Two of my friends who like the FV wound up going Anglican, as the FV fits nicely within its doctrinal parameters.
To be honest, however, considering all the problems the CoE has within its ranks, the FV is fairly low on list. Might even be an improvement for some theologians in it, which is an unnerving thought. |
Confused, but still believe the Bible, many seem to be. | 
04-06-2008, 09:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie The highlighted bit is damnable heresy. Just because they say they do not believe in merit does not mean that they do not believe in merit. This is clearly implying that good works are of the essence of faith - not the fruit of faith. On this basis, we are ultimately saved by our works of covenantal obedience, and not by the imputation of Christ's active obedience. | So you feel it's an entirely different gospel, then?
| 
04-06-2008, 09:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 1,208
Thanks: 93
Thanked 55 Times in 39 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened? | You might see former baptists go from credo immediately to FV...but I don't think there's much chance of it spilling into Baptist circles.
One of my best friends went from baptist to paedo...based partly on discussions I had with him...but mostly from the writings of FV (James Jordan especially)...and now he's Roman Catholic.
__________________ Craig French
Married and father of a beautiful daughter.
Member of Christ The Word, PCA
Toledo, OH MY BLOG | 
04-06-2008, 09:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Given FV's major emphasis on paedobaptism and covenant theology, it is doubtful you will see many FVers in Baptist churches. Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church. |
Yeah, paedobaptism would be a big step for any baptist. | | The Following User Says Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post: | | 
04-06-2008, 09:19 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened? | You might see former baptists go from credo immediately to FV...but I don't think there's much chance of it spilling into Baptist circles.
One of my best friends went from baptist to paedo...based partly on discussions I had with him...but mostly from the writings of FV (James Jordan especially)...and now he's Roman Catholic. | Are his initals "J.B."
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
04-06-2008, 09:21 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 12,349
Thanks: 1,063
Thanked 2,467 Times in 1,173 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened? | Given FV's major emphasis on paedobaptism and covenant theology, it is doubtful you will see many FVers in Baptist churches. Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church. | I think you need to clarify what you mean by stating that the FV is a "boogeyman".
It is certainly more than a "fear" that men and women in NAPARC congregations have been led astray by the error, not the least of which were personal friends of mine.
If, by the statement you only intend to note that it is relatively small group of people then that is generally accurate but it still doesn't qualify as a boogeyman when the error still infests and harms real life people in Reformed Churches that have taken great pains to investigate and condemn the error.
| 
04-06-2008, 09:23 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
| | |
If there are genuine dangers then I would not want to deny them. However, I have seen some people list FV as the number one threat to Christian faith today.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
04-06-2008, 09:33 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 12,349
Thanks: 1,063
Thanked 2,467 Times in 1,173 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe If there are genuine dangers then I would not want to deny them. However, I have seen some people list FV as the number one threat to Christian faith today. | Well, we shouldn't be party to being extreme in either direction. Just because it is an overstatement to state that it is the biggest threat to Christianity does not imply the only alternative is that it is merely a "boogeyman".
| 
04-06-2008, 09:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 1,208
Thanks: 93
Thanked 55 Times in 39 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
Are his initals "J.B." | Yep.
__________________ Craig French
Married and father of a beautiful daughter.
Member of Christ The Word, PCA
Toledo, OH MY BLOG | 
04-06-2008, 10:35 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
| | | Thing is, we should battle whichever error is in front of us. Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe If there are genuine dangers then I would not want to deny them. However, I have seen some people list FV as the number one threat to Christian faith today. | Well, we shouldn't be party to being extreme in either direction. Just because it is an overstatement to state that it is the biggest threat to Christianity does not imply the only alternative is that it is merely a "boogeyman". | In some denominations or churches, the FV is simply not a problem, but there might be a significant attack on the veracity of Scripture, or the divinity of Christ, or His physical resurrection, or the nature of the atonement ("cosmic child abuse"?).
If a denomination's been quite sound but an error like the FV comes sidling in, then by all means, go after it with gusto. Whup it good before it can take root.
But were I in the ECUSA I wouldn't be especially concerned about the FV....I'd worry about that lunatic woman running the show, and her clear rejection of Christ as the sole means of salvation.
Battle the tiger actually in YOUR cage, not the tiger in the cage three over.
__________________ Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas
Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood. The Ivy Vine (my blog) | 
04-06-2008, 10:42 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
| | |
And the "YOUR" isn't Rich or anyone in particular. The whole thing was meant as a general reflection.
Rereading it, I fear it comes across as directed at Rich, and it's not.
__________________ Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas
Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood. The Ivy Vine (my blog) | 
04-07-2008, 11:30 AM
|  | The BOOOOT | | Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,589
Thanks: 35
Thanked 159 Times in 106 Posts
| | Quote: |
Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church.
| The problem is that the "boogeyman" is running loose in our "tiny subset", which makes it a big deal.
| 
04-07-2008, 11:57 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie The highlighted bit is damnable heresy. Just because they say they do not believe in merit does not mean that they do not believe in merit. This is clearly implying that good works are of the essence of faith - not the fruit of faith. On this basis, we are ultimately saved by our works of covenantal obedience, and not by the imputation of Christ's active obedience. | So you feel it's an entirely different gospel, then? | If one believes that view of justification, then they believe another gospel.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
| 
04-07-2008, 12:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | | hard to dispute Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie If one believes that view of justification, then they believe another gospel. |
I read their writings and see your point. Otoh, I have friends in their camp who I think don't get it the way it's taught, and probably are true believers. So I exercise charity.
Sorta like I view Dispensationalism as heresy, but I was in dispensational churches my first 8 years as a believer, 1969-77, before I discovered the Reformed Faith and the PCA, and it was just all over my head. Once I "got it," I quickly left it. I believe there are sincere believers still in it, who still don't get it, but believe what the Holy Spirit has put in their hearts, rather than what C.I. Scofield's heretical footnotes try to teach them.
It's just another example of the wheat and the tares, growing side by side until the final reaping -- imho. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post: | | 
04-07-2008, 12:28 PM
| | | |