The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Federal Vision/New Perspectives

Federal Vision/New Perspectives Discussion of the various innovations regarding justification (New Perspective on Paul, Federal Vision, Shepherdism)

» Online Users: 90
27 members and 63 guests
asc, Beoga, Blue Tick, Blueridge Believer, Brad, ChristianTrader, Curt, davidsuggs, Don, Dwimble, Grymir, Jeff_Bartel, Jen, JohnGill, MOSES, nleshelman, PuritanBouncer, satz, shackleton, toddpedlar
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 12:34 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
The Federal Vision

...
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK

Last edited by AV1611; 06-29-2008 at 01:52 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 12:53 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
Two of my friends who like the FV wound up going Anglican, as the FV fits nicely within its doctrinal parameters.

To be honest, however, considering all the problems the CoE has within its ranks, the FV is fairly low on list. Might even be an improvement for some theologians in it, which is an unnerving thought.
__________________
Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas

Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood.

The Ivy Vine (my blog)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Gryphonette For This Useful Post:
HaigLaw (04-06-2008), JM (05-04-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 04:35 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
There also appears to be a general belief in our final justification or judgement by our works, but not meritoriously, for these works are the gifts of God’s grace, produced by his Spirit in those who have faith in the Son of God, which is, after all, God’s new covenant promise to his people, writing his laws on our hearts and causing us to walk in his ways. Judgement on the basis of what we have done in this life, is after all, what the New Testament says -see for example Revelation 20.12. The place our good works have is taught in (among other passages) John 15.1-8: the Father looks at the branches (the disciples) of the vine (Christ) for fruit and if they don’t bear fruit, they are cut off and thrown away into the fire. The disciples bear fruit because they abide in Christ, and apart from him they can do nothing. By bearing much fruit, the disciples prove to be Christ’s disciples.
The highlighted bit is damnable heresy. Just because they say they do not believe in merit does not mean that they do not believe in merit. This is clearly implying that good works are of the essence of faith - not the fruit of faith. On this basis, we are ultimately saved by our works of covenantal obedience, and not by the imputation of Christ's active obedience.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 04:36 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphonette View Post
Two of my friends who like the FV wound up going Anglican, as the FV fits nicely within its doctrinal parameters.

To be honest, however, considering all the problems the CoE has within its ranks, the FV is fairly low on list. Might even be an improvement for some theologians in it, which is an unnerving thought.
Anything which teaches damnable heresy - under the pretext of being Reformed - is most certainly a grave danger. At least you definitely know the Liberals are not orthodox. These guys are more slippery.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 05:10 PM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Lackey
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 7,022
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 837
Thanked 911 Times in 539 Posts
You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened?
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Grace Baptist Church
Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 06:23 PM
Hippo's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 548
Thanks: 66
Thanked 182 Times in 112 Posts
The FV may be "slippery" but it leads to error rather than necessarily being error in itself. Most of the confusion comes from a refusal of the FV to debate on confessional terms, not due to actual heresy itself.

I would agree with Gryphonette that if the C of E went FV it would be a move in the right direction. The majority of the C of E do not even believe in biblical authority.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 08:56 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened?
Given FV's major emphasis on paedobaptism and covenant theology, it is doubtful you will see many FVers in Baptist churches. Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post:
HaigLaw (04-06-2008), Josiah (04-06-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:11 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphonette View Post
Two of my friends who like the FV wound up going Anglican, as the FV fits nicely within its doctrinal parameters.

To be honest, however, considering all the problems the CoE has within its ranks, the FV is fairly low on list. Might even be an improvement for some theologians in it, which is an unnerving thought.


Confused, but still believe the Bible, many seem to be.
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:13 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
The highlighted bit is damnable heresy. Just because they say they do not believe in merit does not mean that they do not believe in merit. This is clearly implying that good works are of the essence of faith - not the fruit of faith. On this basis, we are ultimately saved by our works of covenantal obedience, and not by the imputation of Christ's active obedience.
So you feel it's an entirely different gospel, then?
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:13 PM
Craig's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 1,208
Thanks: 93
Thanked 55 Times in 39 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened?
You might see former baptists go from credo immediately to FV...but I don't think there's much chance of it spilling into Baptist circles.

One of my best friends went from baptist to paedo...based partly on discussions I had with him...but mostly from the writings of FV (James Jordan especially)...and now he's Roman Catholic.
__________________
Craig French
Married and father of a beautiful daughter.
Member of Christ The Word, PCA
Toledo, OH


MY BLOG
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:15 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post
Given FV's major emphasis on paedobaptism and covenant theology, it is doubtful you will see many FVers in Baptist churches. Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church.


Yeah, paedobaptism would be a big step for any baptist.
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post:
Ivanhoe (04-06-2008)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:19 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened?
You might see former baptists go from credo immediately to FV...but I don't think there's much chance of it spilling into Baptist circles.

One of my best friends went from baptist to paedo...based partly on discussions I had with him...but mostly from the writings of FV (James Jordan especially)...and now he's Roman Catholic.
Are his initals "J.B."
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:21 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 12,349
Thanks: 1,063
Thanked 2,467 Times in 1,173 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
You know, the FV really hasn't caught on in Baptist circles that I can tell. Maybe I'm just not looking in the "right" areas. Obviously it's a Presbyterian thing but I'm sure it has legs and is only a time before it makes it's way to some Reformed Baptist Churches. Does anyone know whether that's already happened?
Given FV's major emphasis on paedobaptism and covenant theology, it is doubtful you will see many FVers in Baptist churches. Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church.
I think you need to clarify what you mean by stating that the FV is a "boogeyman".

It is certainly more than a "fear" that men and women in NAPARC congregations have been led astray by the error, not the least of which were personal friends of mine.

If, by the statement you only intend to note that it is relatively small group of people then that is generally accurate but it still doesn't qualify as a boogeyman when the error still infests and harms real life people in Reformed Churches that have taken great pains to investigate and condemn the error.
__________________
Rich
Northern VA
OPC

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:23 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
If there are genuine dangers then I would not want to deny them. However, I have seen some people list FV as the number one threat to Christian faith today.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:33 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 12,349
Thanks: 1,063
Thanked 2,467 Times in 1,173 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post
If there are genuine dangers then I would not want to deny them. However, I have seen some people list FV as the number one threat to Christian faith today.
Well, we shouldn't be party to being extreme in either direction. Just because it is an overstatement to state that it is the biggest threat to Christianity does not imply the only alternative is that it is merely a "boogeyman".
__________________
Rich
Northern VA
OPC

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:39 PM
Craig's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 1,208
Thanks: 93
Thanked 55 Times in 39 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post

Are his initals "J.B."
Yep.
__________________
Craig French
Married and father of a beautiful daughter.
Member of Christ The Word, PCA
Toledo, OH


MY BLOG
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 10:35 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
Thing is, we should battle whichever error is in front of us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe View Post
If there are genuine dangers then I would not want to deny them. However, I have seen some people list FV as the number one threat to Christian faith today.
Well, we shouldn't be party to being extreme in either direction. Just because it is an overstatement to state that it is the biggest threat to Christianity does not imply the only alternative is that it is merely a "boogeyman".
In some denominations or churches, the FV is simply not a problem, but there might be a significant attack on the veracity of Scripture, or the divinity of Christ, or His physical resurrection, or the nature of the atonement ("cosmic child abuse"?).

If a denomination's been quite sound but an error like the FV comes sidling in, then by all means, go after it with gusto. Whup it good before it can take root.

But were I in the ECUSA I wouldn't be especially concerned about the FV....I'd worry about that lunatic woman running the show, and her clear rejection of Christ as the sole means of salvation.

Battle the tiger actually in YOUR cage, not the tiger in the cage three over.
__________________
Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas

Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood.

The Ivy Vine (my blog)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 10:42 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
And the "YOUR" isn't Rich or anyone in particular. The whole thing was meant as a general reflection.

Rereading it, I fear it comes across as directed at Rich, and it's not.
__________________
Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas

Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood.

The Ivy Vine (my blog)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008, 11:30 AM
wsw201's Avatar
The BOOOOT
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,589
Thanks: 35
Thanked 159 Times in 106 Posts
Quote:
Despite the boogeymen erected on Reformed blogs, it really is only a tiny subset of the Reformed church.
The problem is that the "boogeyman" is running loose in our "tiny subset", which makes it a big deal.
__________________
~Wayne Wylie~
Member, Mid Cities Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Ruling Elder - Inactive
http://www.mcopc.org
Bedford, TX

Job 28:28 - And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008, 11:57 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
The highlighted bit is damnable heresy. Just because they say they do not believe in merit does not mean that they do not believe in merit. This is clearly implying that good works are of the essence of faith - not the fruit of faith. On this basis, we are ultimately saved by our works of covenantal obedience, and not by the imputation of Christ's active obedience.
So you feel it's an entirely different gospel, then?
If one believes that view of justification, then they believe another gospel.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008, 12:15 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
hard to dispute

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
If one believes that view of justification, then they believe another gospel.


I read their writings and see your point. Otoh, I have friends in their camp who I think don't get it the way it's taught, and probably are true believers. So I exercise charity.

Sorta like I view Dispensationalism as heresy, but I was in dispensational churches my first 8 years as a believer, 1969-77, before I discovered the Reformed Faith and the PCA, and it was just all over my head. Once I "got it," I quickly left it. I believe there are sincere believers still in it, who still don't get it, but believe what the Holy Spirit has put in their hearts, rather than what C.I. Scofield's heretical footnotes try to teach them.

It's just another example of the wheat and the tares, growing side by side until the final reaping -- imho.
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HaigLaw For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (04-07-2008), North Jersey Baptist (04-07-2008)
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008, 12:28 PM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar