Has anyone seen the 1997 movie Gattaca? I had to watch it for a class (to identify the worldview issues in the film), and found it interesting, though philosophically flawed.

There seems to be a clear Gnostic worldview presented in the movie. I was wondering if anyone else came to that conclusion (w/o giving too much of the movie away).

__________________
Tim Phillips
Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
Louisville, KY
Husband of Scottish Lass
My Blog: Gairney Bridge
My Facebook/My Avatar

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

"Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin

I watched it years ago, probably near when it came out, and don't recall anything about it, other than not enjoying it. No help here.

__________________
Matt
Reformed Baptist
Christ Community Church

Matthew, I tried watching it a decade ago and couldn't get into it then. When I was assigned to watch it looking for worldview issues, though, it helped me focus a bit more.

There are some interesting metaphors that seemed to be built around pagan philosophy (such as the use of elemental images -- specifically water, wind/air, and fire, though I didn't quite pick up on earth as much).

Call me strange, I liked the movie.

__________________
Casey, Chicagoland, OPC

I will have to check it out, maybe if I can find it at the library.

The movie either begins or ends with "What God has made crooked, no man may make straight." which I viewed as being the assertion that the movie was expressly rejecting. If this was true, the movie assumed that the main character was flawed, and that God didn't intend for him to achieve what He did. In light of revelation, we know otherwise. I think the movie has to assume it's conclusion in order to reach it.

As to the Gnostic overtone, I can't remember ever picking up on that. What gives you the impression that it has one?

__________________
Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo
Deacon
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.

"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.

I do too.

That quote from Ecclesiastes 7.13 appears at the beginning.

__________________
Andrew

i liked the movie. But it was a while ago, so i don't remember any gnosticism.

__________________
Alex
Member of Carmel Baptist Church (SBC)
Matthews, NC

__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB

__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
Member Fairmount ARP Church
Pittsburgh, PA

Deo Vindice

I had forgotten about the quote from Ecclesiastes; thanks for mentioning that. Apparently the movie was originally supposed to have the title "The Eighth Day," but another film was released around the same time and the title had to be changed.

Gnosticism -- there is theme running throughout the movie that seems to suggest that the body is inferior, even if we genetically engineer superior human beings. Even the "perfect" humans in the movie fail (seen in the brothers swimming, the accident that befalls Eugene, the wisdom of the "inferior" detective). The tag line of the movie is even "There Is No Gene For The Human Spirit."

The thing that cinches this for me, though (assuming I am not reading too much into it) is the apartment where Jerome (Vincent) and Eugene (real Jerome) live. There are two levels, separated by a staircase that is obviously meant to look like a double helix. There is a message about movie from the lower level to the higher level, made possible through better genetics. The only problem is that better genetics does not accomplish this. Jerome is at the higher level even though he has inferior genetics (he is an "In-Valid"); Eugene is at the lower level even though he has superior genetics (and he is an invalid). Eugene has never been able to reach the "higher level" (even when he was an Olympian, he only won the silver, and he makes a comment about being on the lower platform, even though he feels he was meant to be on the higher one). Eugene actually does reach the higher level later in the movie through sheer physical determination, but does not remain there (he is carried back down by Jerome). In the end, Eugene realizes he will never escape from his lower level and even dons the silver metal to remind us of that.

In contrast, Jerome is able to attain the higher level through abandoning his own genetic inferiority. He must leave behind his own body (though, granted, taking the body of another) to achieve his goal. In the end he climbs into the space capsule (which looks remarkably like a womb) and leaves the world behind, heading to the stars (the other world), which he describes as "home."

It's not like a spoiler alert for a 11 year old film.

I love that movie. If anything it is a great example of the folly that our life is controlled by our genetics. It's sort of a strange tension for Hollywood: on the one hand we can't help if we're homosexual because of our genes but everything else is up for grabs I guess.

__________________
Rich
PCA, Northern VA
Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

I interpreted it as a critique of eugenics and not anything to do with gnosticism. That's why I liked it, because it's a picture of how dehumanizing technology could potentially be.

Well, certainly I would agree that the film is a critique of eugenics. But the film proceeds from a particular worldview, and that is what I was asking about. The two do not need to be mutually exclusive.

In retrospect, simply saying "Gnostic" is probably not specific enough to be entirely helpful. It is more along the lines of the philosophy of Plotinus (which isn't all that much different than Gnosticism!) that distinguishes between the upper ascent (to the "nous") and the lower ascent (being stuck in the physical realm). Certainly the two levels in the apartment represent the two segregated elements of society (the different genetic types, with the ladder between the two being DNA). However, the underlying theme seems to be one of freedom (the main character's last name is "Freeman") being achieved through will and determination ("the spirit") rather than science/genetics ("the physical"). The DNA staircase and the use of pagan elements (fire, water, air) seemed to hint at an underlying element reminiscent of Gnosticism.

wow, i totally missed the symbolism of the staircase and apartment. but i'm still not sure the movie is pitting the physicial vs the spiritual, so much as saying there is a spiritual reality. our spirit or soul will never be identified in genes or seen in a microscope but is just as crucial to who we are and what we can accomplish. so in the end, i think it's simply against a purely materialistic worldview.