The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Evangelism, Missions and the Persecuted Church

Evangelism, Missions and the Persecuted Church Discussions about Evangelism, the Church and missions, personal missions experiences and the Persecuted Church throughout the world.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 95
16 members and 79 guests
Brian Withnell, caoclan, Carolyn, Daniel, Frank Brito., Heidelberg1, Jerusalem Blade, JM, LawrenceU, P. F. Pugh, Puritan Scot, satz, TimV, William Price
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009, 05:43 PM
Dr. Bob Gonzales's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 897
Thanks: 385
Thanked 363 Times in 181 Posts
Why Every Believer Is A Missionary

In the post below, church-planter and pastor, Matt Troupe, argues that at one level every believer is a missionary. Matt's article is brief, but his argument is, I think, cogent. We need to inculcate within our people a missional perspective with respect to their own calling in the world. I'd encourage you to read Matt's brief post.

Why Every Believer Is A Missionary

Your servant,
__________________
Bob Gonzales Jr., Dean
Reformed Baptist Seminary
Easley, South Carolina

"Persons need not and ought not to set any bounds to their spiritual and gracious appetites." Jonathan Edwards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:48 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: St.James ,NY
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 606
Thanked 230 Times in 159 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Bob Gonzales View Post
In the post below, church-planter and pastor, Matt Troupe, argues that at one level every believer is a missionary. Matt's article is brief, but his argument is, I think, cogent. We need to inculcate within our people a missional perspective with respect to their own calling in the world. I'd encourage you to read Matt's brief post.

Why Every Believer Is A Missionary

Your servant,
Some might have trouble with this in that they might have seen some poor attempts to evangelize go in a really poor direction.
Others believe it is only the pastoral ministry of elders who are called to do this work.
In any case those who speak to others about their soul's condition should remain accountable to the oversight of a local church. It should not be an either /or, proposition.
Going to a hospital or nursing home, speaking with co-workers, or praying about each and every random contact we have should be done with a view to God's glory in the salvation , or damnation of those souls we speak with.
2Cor 2-3
Quote:
14Now thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place.

15For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish:

16To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?

17For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
Quote:
2 Corinthians 3
1Do we begin again to commend ourselves? or need we, as some others, epistles of commendation to you, or letters of commendation from you?

2Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of all men:

3Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.

4And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward:

5Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;

6Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

7But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:

8How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?

9For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.

10For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth.

11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.

12Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:

13And not as Moses, which put a veil over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:

14But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.

15But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart.

16Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.

17Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

18But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.
__________________
Anthony D'Arienzo
Sunday School Teacher
Hope Reformed Baptist Church:
Medford, N.Y.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:50 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
I would rather say that every believer is a "Witness" and keep the term "missionary" for those that are sent by churches in order to deliberately cross ethno-linguistic boundaries with the Gospel.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:
Bygracealone (08-05-2009), Jake (08-04-2009), KMK (08-05-2009), Tim (08-05-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 11:21 AM
Dr. Bob Gonzales's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 897
Thanks: 385
Thanked 363 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
I would rather say that every believer is a "Witness" and keep the term "missionary" for those that are sent by churches in order to deliberately cross ethno-linguistic boundaries with the Gospel.
Perg,

I think we need to be careful that we're not more fastidious in our use of terminology than the Bible itself. For example, I've heard many on this board object to the application of the term "evangelism" to lay-activity and suggest that we use instead the term "witness." This concern is apparently born out of the conviction that "evangelism" is the function of the ordained man while "witnessing" is a function that applies to all believers.

In point of fact, the term "witness" in the NT, particularly in John's writings, is more often a technical expression employed to denote the official witness that
(1) the OT Scripture writers bore of Christ (5:39), that John the Baptist bore of Christ (1:15, 32, 34; 3:26; 5:33),
(2) that Jesus bore of himself and the truth (1:8; 3:11; 3:32; 4:44; 5:31, 36; 7:7; 8:13-14, 18; 10:25; 18:37),
(3) that the Father bore of Christ (5:32, 37; 8:18), that the Spirit would bear of Christ (15:26), and
(4) that Christ’s chosen apostles were to bear of him (1:34; 15:27; 19:35; 21:24).
If there were ever a role that might be too lofty for laypeople, it would be “bearing witness”! Of course, the apostle John wasn’t so penurious with his vocabulary as some clericalists today. He was willing to describe a crowd of people flocking to Jesus on the basis of a Samaritan woman’s “testimony [marturouses]” (4:39). And John will use the Greek noun martus to designate those “martyrs,” whether clergy or laity, who seal their verbal testimony with their own blood (Rev. 17:6).

Similarly, Mark could employ the Greek verb Paul used for “preaching” (kerusso) to describe, on the one hand, Jesus’ official proclamation of the gospel (Mark 1:14) and, on the other hand, the enthusiastic testimonies of a leper now healed, a demoniac now freed, and a deaf-dumb man now hearing and speaking (Mark 1:45; 5:20; 7:32). If the Scripture writers could use gospel vocabulary to predicate both clerical and non-clerical activity, why can’t we?

Indeed, the word "apostle," which is the equivalent to the Latin "missionary," is used to designate non-office bearers in 2 Corinthians 8:22-23. For this reason, I think we have precedent to distinguish between different kinds of "apostles" or "missionaries." And since the responsibility of the Great Commission devolves on every member of the church in some way and to some degree, I see nothing wrong with describing all of Christ's disciples as "missionaries" at some level though I also acknowledge the usage of that term to describe someone officially ordained and sent by the church to plant churches.

Your servant,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dr. Bob Gonzales For This Useful Post:
Knoxienne (08-05-2009), Pergamum (08-05-2009)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 11:23 AM
Knoxienne's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 967 Times in 581 Posts
A missionary is one who is "sent". We are "sent" because we get our marching orders from King Christ, the One who sends us. So, whether he sends us next door or around the world, we are all sent, to teach as we go and give the gospel.
__________________
Toni Cunningham, Wife of Bill (Theognome)
Parkwoods OPC, Overland Park KS


"Vice is a monster of so frightful mien, As, to be hated, needs but to be seen; Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face, We first endure, then pity, then embrace." ~ Alexander Pope
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knoxienne For This Useful Post:
Dr. Bob Gonzales (08-05-2009), Pergamum (08-05-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 11:42 AM
dr_parsley's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 444
Thanks: 122
Thanked 199 Times in 99 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Bob Gonzales View Post
In the post below, church-planter and pastor, Matt Troupe, argues that at one level every believer is a missionary.
I'm surprised it's not blatantly obvious! Are we soldiers of God forever in training in the barracks or are we given a mission to perform? That "mission" may not be an exact identification of what is thought of as a "missionaries" task, but whatever that mission is, or those missions are, we are missionaries. If overseas missionaries want a word all to themselves, they should make one up and not impoverish the language by disallowing the use of this one.

I would also say that every believer has a vocation in the Lord, even if it's a second job.
__________________
Paul
No denomination, affiliated with FIEC
"Deliver me from worldly dispositions, for I am born from above and destined for glory" - Valley of Vision
"They think it strange that you do not plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation" - Peter
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 02:00 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr_parsley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Bob Gonzales View Post
In the post below, church-planter and pastor, Matt Troupe, argues that at one level every believer is a missionary.
I'm surprised it's not blatantly obvious! Are we soldiers of God forever in training in the barracks or are we given a mission to perform? That "mission" may not be an exact identification of what is thought of as a "missionaries" task, but whatever that mission is, or those missions are, we are missionaries. If overseas missionaries want a word all to themselves, they should make one up and not impoverish the language by disallowing the use of this one.

I would also say that every believer has a vocation in the Lord, even if it's a second job.
It is not that we need a word all to ourselves, but if everything becomes "missions" and everyone becomes a "missionary" than nothing really becomes missions....

Those that are using the word "missions" for everything that the church does (social justice, arts, etc) are actually the ones impoverishing language and blurring the great urgency of intentional, deliberate and cross-cultural witness.


I do wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Bob that we do need to stress the duties and privileges of all believers to bear witness to Christ and I do not want to object to strongly to any terminology that serves to mobilize the laymen. We are all witnesses, so let us light up the world.

-----Added 8/5/2009 at 02:00:21 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Bob Gonzales View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
I would rather say that every believer is a "Witness" and keep the term "missionary" for those that are sent by churches in order to deliberately cross ethno-linguistic boundaries with the Gospel.
Perg,

I think we need to be careful that we're not more fastidious in our use of terminology than the Bible itself. For example, I've heard many on this board object to the application of the term "evangelism" to lay-activity and suggest that we use instead the term "witness." This concern is apparently born out of the conviction that "evangelism" is the function of the ordained man while "witnessing" is a function that applies to all believers.

In point of fact, the term "witness" in the NT, particularly in John's writings, is more often a technical expression employed to denote the official witness that
(1) the OT Scripture writers bore of Christ (5:39), that John the Baptist bore of Christ (1:15, 32, 34; 3:26; 5:33),
(2) that Jesus bore of himself and the truth (1:8; 3:11; 3:32; 4:44; 5:31, 36; 7:7; 8:13-14, 18; 10:25; 18:37),
(3) that the Father bore of Christ (5:32, 37; 8:18), that the Spirit would bear of Christ (15:26), and
(4) that Christ’s chosen apostles were to bear of him (1:34; 15:27; 19:35; 21:24).
If there were ever a role that might be too lofty for laypeople, it would be “bearing witness”! Of course, the apostle John wasn’t so penurious with his vocabulary as some clericalists today. He was willing to describe a crowd of people flocking to Jesus on the basis of a Samaritan woman’s “testimony [marturouses]” (4:39). And John will use the Greek noun martus to designate those “martyrs,” whether clergy or laity, who seal their verbal testimony with their own blood (Rev. 17:6).

Similarly, Mark could employ the Greek verb Paul used for “preaching” (kerusso) to describe, on the one hand, Jesus’ official proclamation of the gospel (Mark 1:14) and, on the other hand, the enthusiastic testimonies of a leper now healed, a demoniac now freed, and a deaf-dumb man now hearing and speaking (Mark 1:45; 5:20; 7:32). If the Scripture writers could use gospel vocabulary to predicate both clerical and non-clerical activity, why can’t we?

Indeed, the word "apostle," which is the equivalent to the Latin "missionary," is used to designate non-office bearers in 2 Corinthians 8:22-23. For this reason, I think we have precedent to distinguish between different kinds of "apostles" or "missionaries." And since the responsibility of the Great Commission devolves on every member of the church in some way and to some degree, I see nothing wrong with describing all of Christ's disciples as "missionaries" at some level though I also acknowledge the usage of that term to describe someone officially ordained and sent by the church to plant churches.

Your servant,
Dr Bob;


If we translate kerusso as "preaching", would you advocate then that preaching is much broader than merely what occurs in the pulpit by the official ecclesiastical authority of a church, i.e. laymen can "preach" and even women can "preach" if we are all to be missionaries who engage in "preaching" kerusso? If all are sent and all are missionaries, who can preach, give the sacraments, and plant churches?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 02:21 PM
dr_parsley's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 444
Thanks: 122
Thanked 199 Times in 99 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr_parsley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Bob Gonzales View Post
In the post below, church-planter and pastor, Matt Troupe, argues that at one level every believer is a missionary.
I'm surprised it's not blatantly obvious! Are we soldiers of God forever in training in the barracks or are we given a mission to perform? That "mission" may not be an exact identification of what is thought of as a "missionaries" task, but whatever that mission is, or those missions are, we are missionaries. If overseas missionaries want a word all to themselves, they should make one up and not impoverish the language by disallowing the use of this one.

I would also say that every believer has a vocation in the Lord, even if it's a second job.
It is not that we need a word all to ourselves, but if everything becomes "missions" and everyone becomes a "missionary" than nothing really becomes missions....

Those that are using the word "missions" for everything that the church does (social justice, arts, etc) are actually the ones impoverishing language and blurring the great urgency of intentional, deliberate and cross-cultural witness.
Oh yes, I fully agree with you there. I think the compartmentalisation is a problem in itself. Our vocation and mission ought to saturate the whole of our lives and not be associated with a particular activity. It's about everyone being aware of their calling, not about finding something for each person to call "ministry" or "mission". There shouldn't be "I'm a missionary because I do X" or "My ministry is Y" because one shouldn't be able to identify in ones dealings with the church and the world what is mission and what isn't if the whole life is mission and ministry and witness.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 04:51 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr_parsley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr_parsley View Post

I'm surprised it's not blatantly obvious! Are we soldiers of God forever in training in the barracks or are we given a mission to perform? That "mission" may not be an exact identification of what is thought of as a "missionaries" task, but whatever that mission is, or those missions are, we are missionaries. If overseas missionaries want a word all to themselves, they should make one up and not impoverish the language by disallowing the use of this one.

I would also say that every believer has a vocation in the Lord, even if it's a second job.
It is not that we need a word all to ourselves, but if everything becomes "missions" and everyone becomes a "missionary" than nothing really becomes missions....

Those that are using the word "missions" for everything that the church does (social justice, arts, etc) are actually the ones impoverishing language and blurring the great urgency of intentional, deliberate and cross-cultural witness.
Oh yes, I fully agree with you there. I think the compartmentalisation is a problem in itself. Our vocation and mission ought to saturate the whole of our lives and not be associated with a particular activity. It's about everyone being aware of their calling, not about finding something for each person to call "ministry" or "mission". There shouldn't be "I'm a missionary because I do X" or "My ministry is Y" because one shouldn't be able to identify in ones dealings with the church and the world what is mission and what isn't if the whole life is mission and ministry and witness.
Wow, I just think we might be agreed 100% then. I guess this happens ever so often.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 05:02 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Bob Gonzales View Post
And since the responsibility of the Great Commission devolves on every member of the church in some way and to some degree, I see nothing wrong with describing all of Christ's disciples as "missionaries" at some level though I also acknowledge the usage of that term to describe someone officially ordained and sent by the church to plant churches.
Regardless, if you start using the word 'missionary' to describe every Christian you are going to confuse a lot of people.
__________________


http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


"Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 05:04 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
If theyse all be missionaries how come theyse aint out der mishing?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 05:11 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
If theyse all be missionaries how come theyse aint out der mishing?
It would add a whole new meaning to the phrase, "Missionary Support". Obama would love it! Everyone gets a piece of the pie that you guys have been hoarding for the last 2000 years.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 05:15 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
If theyse all be missionaries how come theyse aint out der mishing?
It would add a whole new meaning to the phrase, "Missionary Support". Obama would love it! Everyone gets a piece of the pie that you guys have been hoarding for the last 2000 years.
I aint been hoarding all that much. My pie slice has been rather thin at times!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 05:50 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
If theyse all be missionaries how come theyse aint out der mishing?
It would add a whole new meaning to the phrase, "Missionary Support". Obama would love it! Everyone gets a piece of the pie that you guys have been hoarding for the last 2000 years.
I aint been hoarding all that much. My pie slice has been rather thin at times!
Well, c'mon, its not like you do anything important like fix toilets or dry clean shirts.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69