» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 79 | | 18 members and 61 guests | | beej6, Blue Tick, bookslover, Clay7926, DMcFadden, Hippo, InevitablyReformed, Jeff_Bartel, Josh G, NaphtaliPress, Puritan Sailor, Reformed Christian, Reformed-Kermit, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
05-06-2008, 08:12 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 386
Thanks: 96
Thanked 51 Times in 40 Posts
| | | OT necessarily before NT? In the context of scriptural illiteracy, i.e. dealing with people with minimal or no Christian heritage, I have a personal aversion to presenting the NT stories at all without laying an OT foundation. Yet I see most mission groups focusing on the NT, handing out NT freely or highly subsidized to non-believers and new believers. Bible translators generally translate one of the gospels first; frequently the entire NT is published before the OT. Is it not an act of arrogance to reverse the divine order of revelation? Am I missing something?
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
05-06-2008, 10:02 PM
|  | "da wabbit" | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,743
Thanks: 6
Thanked 896 Times in 342 Posts
| | | I think it is person-, and possibly culture- specific.
There is much value in sending someone to the OT first. I used that recently with a man, who upon a lengthy reading came to realize much better the sinful condition of man, including himself. Which sets the stage quite nicely for the gospel message.
But many people can benefit from starting with John's gospel, or some other NT passage. Remember, Christ is in ALL the Scriptures. No matter where you start, you can find a way to him without contortions. Concerning the Law and the prophets, "These are they which testify of me."
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- | 
05-06-2008, 11:11 PM
|  | PB Evil Scientist...Boo! | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 2,392
Thanks: 59
Thanked 427 Times in 236 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum I think it is person-, and possibly culture- specific.
There is much value in sending someone to the OT first. I used that recently with a man, who upon a lengthy reading came to realize much better the sinful condition of man, including himself. Which sets the stage quite nicely for the gospel message.
But many people can benefit from starting with John's gospel, or some other NT passage. Remember, Christ is in ALL the Scriptures. No matter where you start, you can find a way to him without contortions. Concerning the Law and the prophets, "These are they which testify of me." | In complete agreement, Bruce. Mary, one might look to Paul's various approaches as an evangelist - they very much depended upon his audience. To the pagans at the Areopagus, he didn't exactly start with Adam, Noah, Abraham and Moses...
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA http://semperubi.rtrc.net
"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love) | 
05-06-2008, 11:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 272
Thanked 374 Times in 301 Posts
| | I have found that the Gospel of Mark is a good place to start when witnessing or when studying with a new believer. 
__________________ Sterling Harmon
Coventry, CT
PCA
Deacon
________________
"Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
-- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.
"Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
-- Martin Luther, Table Talk | 
05-06-2008, 11:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 796
Thanked 383 Times in 265 Posts
| | | Out of curiosity why Mark? | 
05-07-2008, 12:21 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 272
Thanked 374 Times in 301 Posts
| | | I find that the pace of the Gospel of Mark is such that it is useful in keeping the newer Christian focused.
As an example, read through the first chapter.
Note how many times the word "immediately" ("staightway," "forthwith," "anon"--all the same Greek word) is used in just the first chapter. Mark writes from the perspective of "Christ as Servant" and His service is one of almost non-stop action. In the first chapter we can study about John the Baptist, the Baptism of Jesus, His temptation, the Calling of His disciples, Casting out demons, preaching in Galilee, and healing a leper.
It does not contain the more difficult "theological" passages like John 6 (which, IMHO is difficult enough for the mature Christian to grasp) or the mystery parables of Matthew13. But it is profoundly theological.
In this book I find twin themes that run through out. Opposition to the Servant, and the Diety of the Servant. It is a wonderful little study, to go through this book with a non-christian, or a new believer and point out that every time the pharisees oppose Him, He meets that opposition with some aspect of His deity. (example: In chapter two...the Pharisees complain that the disciples ate picked some wheat on the Sabbath, Jesus declares himself "Lord also of the Sabbath.") When opposition comes, Jesus meets it with His divinity. His victories over opposition show so clearly that He is the second person of the Godhead that only a Pharisee could miss it.
It really is a most profitable study, and by the time the new Christian gets to chapter 16, enough foundational truths have been laid, that it is easier after that to look at the Gospel of John, or some of the other more difficult Books. | 
05-07-2008, 01:32 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 2,412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 143 Times in 100 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum Remember, Christ is in ALL the Scriptures. No matter where you start, you can find a way to him without contortions. Concerning the Law and the prophets, "These are they which testify of me." | Yes, that's true. But, for a new believer - especially one who wouldn't know a Bible from a Buick - sending him or her to the New Testament makes more sense, in my opinion, since that is where Christ is most obviously present. For a brand new believer, the Old Testament looks like a vast ocean of text. (Heck, for too many Christians, the Old Testament looks that way!) As with your reference to the Gospel of John, Bruce, I'd be compassionate on a new, biblically illiterate Christian, and send him or her to the New Testament first.
__________________
Richard T. Zuelch, M.Div
Ruling Elder, OPC (not currently serving)
Westminster Presbyterian Church, CA (OPC) www.reiterations.wordpress.com www.foft.wordpress.com
It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire and ice - there are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia. - Frank Zappa (1940-1993)
| 
05-07-2008, 06:19 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 386
Thanks: 96
Thanked 51 Times in 40 Posts
| | | It seems that opinions are unanimous that I'm off-base on insisting on OT first. I stand corrected and appreciate it. This will impact the curriculum that I'm developing for using the scriptures to teach disadvantaged children English, using the scriptures.
I also like the idea of using Mark first. In addition to those cited, there aren't so many references to OT stories as what there are in Matthew, nor the theological complexities of John. | 
05-07-2008, 07:19 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,565
Thanks: 386
Thanked 571 Times in 288 Posts
| | | No, I do not think you are off base.
I see that you are in Ethiopia, and I am also in another place and many people are not grounded in Bible stories and to start at teh New Testament is not enough to lay the groundwork.
Many mission groups start in Genesis, the fall, Noah, Abraham,and then go to the birth fo Jesus.
This is standard fare for New Tribes Missions and the Firm Foundations course of teaching and is very effective for tribals.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
05-07-2008, 09:45 AM
|  | Owner and Card Conjurer | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Coconut Creek, FL (or wherever I am)
Posts: 4,840
Thanks: 0
Thanked 75 Times in 32 Posts
| | | Personally, I'd follow God's revelaed revelation in that regard.
A Muslim came to a Christian Bible study to inquire and listen. Previous to that, he had never read the Bible. They gave him one in his own language. By the next meeting, he had read it three times all the way through and new the order of the books better than the Christians in the study.
Don't think that its too much for someone to read the bible from the beginning through to the revelation of God's Son. | 
05-07-2008, 10:28 AM
|  | "da wabbit" | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,743
Thanks: 6
Thanked 896 Times in 342 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie It seems that opinions are unanimous that I'm off-base on insisting on OT first. I stand corrected and appreciate it. This will impact the curriculum that I'm developing for using the scriptures to teach disadvantaged children English, using the scriptures.
I also like the idea of using Mark first. In addition to those cited, there aren't so many references to OT stories as what there are in Matthew, nor the theological complexities of John. | I certainly didn't get this impression from reading the posts, Leslie. I thought they were pretty balanced. Some prefer one or the other, most think starting with the OT is fine, if that's what's appropriate. | 
05-07-2008, 01:29 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 386
Thanks: 96
Thanked 51 Times in 40 Posts
| | | I started with creation and am currently through Noah and the flood. I like the idea of going through the life of Abraham at least before going to the NT. It's just too time-consuming and too easy to be derailed, going through the entire OT history to the captivity, before turning to the NT. | 
05-07-2008, 01:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 211
Thanks: 32
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
| | There is a series of books called "The Gospel according to Old Testament", going through some of the narratives in the OT and show how they are related to Christ. Perhaps those will be helpful when you are going through the OT with unbeliever, while keeping an eye on Christ the whole time.
Here is a link to wtsbooks: Westminster Bookstore - Reformed Books - Low Prices - Flat Fee UPS Shipping - Gospel Acc. to the OT
Blessings,
__________________
Polo
Layman, Chinese Evangelical Church/Independent
San Diego
For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever.  (Romans 11:36)
| | The Following User Says Thank You to aleksanderpolo For This Useful Post: | | 
05-07-2008, 02:13 PM
|  | "da wabbit" | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,743
Thanks: 6
Thanked 896 Times in 342 Posts
| | Young Christians in places where there are fewer opportunities to get early education can often benefit from materials aimed at younger ages in our "educated" cultures.
This is no less true in our own "educated" churches. I think the children's catechism should be reviewed by adults frequently, to remind themselves how "elementary" is the faith. Even their faith should, after all, be "childlike."
In addition to other studies mentioned, Nancy Ganz' new series of children-oriented Bible commentaries might be useful. Amazon.com: Herein Is Love, Vol. 1: Genesis:... | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post: | | 
05-07-2008, 09:48 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,565
Thanks: 386
Thanked 571 Times in 288 Posts
| | | Wow! That's a really neatcommentary set. |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |