The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Evangelism, Missions and the Persecuted Church

Evangelism, Missions and the Persecuted Church Discussions about Evangelism, the Church and missions, personal missions experiences and the Persecuted Church throughout the world.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 47
7 members and 40 guests
Blue Tick, CarlosOliveira, jd.morrison, owenanderson, satz, victorbravo
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 08:11 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,434
Thanks: 886
Thanked 1,083 Times in 595 Posts
This Gospel to all nations...then the end?

This Gospel will be preached to all nations and then the End......



What is a "nation"

Does the Gospel need to reach every nation before Christ returns?

If the word "nation" means an unreached tribe (a distinct ethno-linguistic grouping of people), then must every tribe be evangelized before Christ returns?

There are 274 languages just in the area where I am at! And several thousand languages in the world.

Did this happen in Acts 2?


Is a nation a People-group as missiologists define it? What is the theological basis of the people group concept?

Missiologists use categories such a "reached" or "unreached" - are there any Bibical bases for these terms? When is a people group "reached"?
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 08:50 AM
BobVigneault's Avatar
The Odd Mod(erator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 5,863
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,296 Times in 539 Posts
I take the preterist stance on this. The 'world' spoken of is the known Roman 'world' of New Testament times. So if you look at the following verses one may conclude that the gospel was in fact preached to the entire world before the end (of the Temple and sacrificial worship) and the coming of Christ in judgment against Jerusalem in 70 AD.


Quote:
Col. 1:3 We always thank God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, when we pray for you, 4 since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of the love that you have for all the saints, 5 because of the hope laid up for you in heaven. Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel, 6 which has come to you, as indeed in the whole world it is bearing fruit and growing—as it also does among you, since the day you heard it and understood the grace of God in truth, 7 just as you learned it from Epaphras our beloved fellow servant.

23 if indeed you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel that you heard, which has been proclaimed in all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, became a minister.

Rom 16:25 Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages 26 but has now been disclosed and through the prophetic writings has been made known to all nations, according to the command of the eternal God, to bring about the obedience of faith— 27 to the only wise God be glory forevermore through Jesus Christ! Amen.
__________________
Bob Vigneault (Bawb Vēēn-yo)
I just know there's got to be a pony in here somewhere!

The Heartbeat of Heaven (blog) MySpace (Music), MySpace (Personal)
Member of Christ Presbyterian Church, Janesville, WI OPC www.christ-opc.org

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to BobVigneault For This Useful Post:
Dr Mike Kear (12-19-2007)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:27 AM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
"da wabbit"
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,991
Thanks: 16
Thanked 1,310 Times in 490 Posts
I think it is simpler to just say that God will wait until all his elect are brought in, and completes any other purpose of his for the world (which is subordinate in any case, and surely tied in both time and effect closely to the main). And then everything shudders to a halt for Judgment Day.

Rev 5:9 And they sing a new song, saying, Worthy art thou to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou was slain, and didst purchase unto God with thy blood men of every tribe, and tongue, and people, and nation."

Some languages have come and gone. Perhaps without a single convert. But the passage is teaching a fullness of the redemption. Everyone on this earth, whatever their language pattern, is ultimately related, so back up far enough and they are "one" with somebody else in identity and language.

Bottom line: I don't think God is waiting for us to "close the 10-40 window," as much as he is expecting us to simply preach the gospel as wide and far as humanly posible.
__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post:
Blueridge Believer (12-19-2007), KMK (12-19-2007), Pilgrim (12-19-2007)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:30 AM
toddpedlar's Avatar
PB Evil Scientist...Boo!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 2,834
Thanks: 70
Thanked 600 Times in 343 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum View Post
I think it is simpler to just say that God will wait until all his elect are brought in, and completes any other purpose of his for the world (which is subordinate in any case, and surely tied in both time and effect closely to the main). And then everything shudders to a halt for Judgment Day.

Rev 5:9 And they sing a new song, saying, Worthy art thou to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou was slain, and didst purchase unto God with thy blood men of every tribe, and tongue, and people, and nation."

Some languages have come and gone. Perhaps without a single convert. But the passage is teaching a fullness of the redemption. Everyone on this earth, whatever their language pattern, is ultimately related, so back up far enough and they are "one" with somebody else in identity and language.

Bottom line: I don't think God is waiting for us to "close the 10-40 window," as much as he is expecting us to simply preach the gospel as wide and far as humanly posible.
While I agree with Bob on the interpretation of this verse, it seems clear that Bruce has made an important point here. Our job is to preach the Gospel until Christ comes, period. We ought not to be concerned about "hastening the end" or whatever... just go out and preach to all, period. It's pretty simple - to delve into the mechanisms of prophetic fulfillment is a grand waste of time, imho.
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://semperubi.rtrc.net

"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:45 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,434
Thanks: 886
Thanked 1,083 Times in 595 Posts
We delve into the mechanics of EVERYTHING here on the PB, to include the decrees of God. Why not the mechanics of missions?


It appears as if SOME deductions CAN be reached.



For instance, if you had 10 elders from your home church and they felt as if they were called to either Atlanta, GA or Saudi Arabia and had the means to go either place and left it up to your church to decide, it seems logical that the priority would be one place over the other.

This issue is important as far as prioritizing where to go next or sink limited resources into. If only 50 workers are available and there are means to send them anywhere in the world, where do they go to best serve world evangelism? One method for prioritization is by filling the "most needy" people groups and different formulas of need have been attempted.


Also,
If Rev 5 does say thou was slain, and didst purchase unto God with thy blood men of every tribe, and tongue, and people, and nation."


Then it is not a very full salvation it seems if some from every tongue, tribe and nation are not included under that throne. Christ, then, did not, in fact, purchase some from every tongue, tribe and nation but only merely purchased some from some tribes and some tingues and some nations.


What is a tongue, tribe and nation? Do we draw it from the Genesis Table of Nations? If so, Acts 2 seems to be a fulfillment, because all nations were included in Acts 2.


But Paul, who speaks of the whole world knowing of the Gospel, still tried to go to Spain and name Christ where He was not yet named....what's with that?
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:03 AM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
"da wabbit"
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,991
Thanks: 16
Thanked 1,310 Times in 490 Posts
I agree that we need not be uninterested in the mechanics of mission. However, I think we could end up trying to reduce the mind of Christ to a formula. What happens to the sense of mission once the Bible is translated into every known tongue? After a generation, will the sense of urgency fall off, because of a sense of "disappointment" that Jesus hasn't returned yet? While it might not be the dominant attitude (I hope it wouldn't be!), I can see a sense of futility hitting many people, when there isn't a rapid "end-time" revival, and a rapture. Why? Because they were so program-driven instead of sovereign-grace motivated.

By all means, let the call go out from the church: "We want to send someone to Xxxxxx. We think there is a crying need for someone there (as opposed to over here.)" And then find the man who is willing to go. But I think the answer ends up being different for those of different visions, and different churches. I don't think there is a single answer. Because Jesus is sitting higher, and looking farther than any of us can attain to his scope.

As for Rev. 5, I believe in a literal fulfillment of it. But how do we define (as you said) what is every one of those things. Well, in the last analysis, we don't have to worry about Jesus' definition. We simply work hard at the ministry we've been given. And look forward to that huge throng at the end, harmonizing the heavenly chorus in ways we cannot comprehend.
__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:07 AM
Puritan Sailor's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clinton, MS
Posts: 5,196
Thanks: 134
Thanked 232 Times in 126 Posts
John Piper answers this question in Ch 5 of Let the Nations be Glad. He say it refers to people groups, and narrows it down to basically clans on pg 205ff.
__________________
Patrick
OPC
MDiv, RTS Jackson.

"He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:54 AM
Poimen's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Leduc, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,914
Thanks: 151
Thanked 473 Times in 261 Posts
What Patrick said: how do we define nations? Or, more importantly ask yourself: how did the people of Jesus day define nations?

In the NT, one of the most common uses of 'ethnos' (nation) is Gentiles (vs. Jews). This does not refer to countries (as in our day) but people groups (see Bruce's argument from Revelation 5:9) Additionally, in Matthew's 'Jewish' gospel, this word is most often used to dichotomize the faithful Jew and the godless Gentile. I would understand Jesus use of 'ethnos' (nation) in Matthew 24:9 to be consistent with this understanding since the context brings up the 'abomination of desolation'.
__________________
Rev. Daniel Kok
Pastor of Grace Reformed Church (URCNA)
Leduc, Alberta CANADA
Church Blog

"there is no creature, either in heaven or on earth, who loves us more than Jesus Christ"
Belgic Confession, Article 26

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:55 AM
Amazing Grace's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
This Gospel will be preached to all nations and then the End......

What is a "nation"
A nation is non Hebrew. Scripture calls the jews "people" and the nations were gentiles.

the Hebrew people are 'am and non hebrew Goyim
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI

Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 01:47 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,771
Thanks: 1,748
Thanked 404 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
We delve into the mechanics of EVERYTHING here on the PB, to include the decrees of God. Why not the mechanics of missions?
I would assume much prayer would be part of the mechanics as well as waiting for the guidance of the Spirit. I am not being glib. Acts seems to show there is a lot of both involved with missions work.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 02:17 PM
toddpedlar's Avatar
PB Evil Scientist...Boo!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 2,834
Thanks: 70
Thanked 600 Times in 343 Posts
My point was only that one should not be concerned about the question of what "nation" means... especially if that question leads you to be worried about reaching all of the "nations" so that Christ can finally come.

My point was to say, just go and do it.
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://semperubi.rtrc.net

"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 04:35 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 144
Thanks: 5
Thanked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Although we are definitely meant to spread the gospel to all people, I'm not sure that is what is meant by "the gospel to all nations... and then the end." It appears that this is referring to the witness that Paul and others bore to the heads of nations when they were brought on trial before various rulers before the temple’s destruction. Notice in the following how that statement is sandwiched in between two statements about going on trial before rulers:

“you will stand before governors and kings for my sake, to bear witness before them. And the gospel must first be proclaimed to all nations. And when they bring you to trial and deliver you over, do not be anxious beforehand what you are to say”

Sounds similar to what Paul said about how the he was thankful when brought on trial because through it the gospel was being preached to rulers (And he was thankful that even those accusing him had to preach the gospel themselves in order to explain the charges against him to the heads of regions and nations). It seems to me like this witness before the representatives of nations and peoples is in fulfillment of what is meant by “the gospel being preached to all nations” in Jesus’ apocalypse.
__________________
C. Gorsuch
Glencullen Baptist
Portland, Oregon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:19 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,434
Thanks: 886
Thanked 1,083 Times in 595 Posts
Thanks,

Still if CHrist will redeem some from every tongue, tribe and nation, and whole tribes have gone out of existence without a believer, how is Scripture still true?

Again: Christ did not say that He woul redeem some from some tribes, but some from every tribe, tongue, nations...


Also;
In Genesis, right before Babel, the table of nations is listed. Are these prototypical nations? THis would mean that the Gospel was preached to all nations at Acts 2 possibly if the term "nations" is defined by this table of nations in Genesis.




What about the whole "People group Focus" of modern missions. Is it an improvement? A bad thing? And can it be used to prioritize the sending of missionaries?



Also, if we send evangelists to Group X and try to saturate Group X with the Gospel and create an indigenous church in Group X, rather than merely a geographical area how is this related to the Homogenous Unit Principle? We are targetting specific peoples after all and trying to create to communicate the Gospel to those target peoples in particular.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:21 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,434
Thanks: 886
Thanked 1,083 Times in 595 Posts
Last thing: If Paul believed that the Gospel had already been proclaimed to the whole world (as he seems to say so in Romans) why was he trying so hard to get to Spain and preach Christ where He was not named?
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:40 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,771
Thanks: 1,748
Thanked 404 Times in 240 Posts
Are we to assume that only those mentioned by name in the book of Acts did any proclaiming? Is it not possible that others were proclaiming who never get mentioned by name?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:57 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 144
Thanks: 5
Thanked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Perhaps we're not meant to read "every tongue and tribe and nation" in such a strict literal way any more than were are to read Paul's statement about every creature under heaven has heard the gospel as being strictly literal. It would sure sound strange to say, "Jesus has redeemed people from many, but not all, nations; including many, but not all, creatures." Just doesn't have the same poetic force.
__________________
C. Gorsuch
Glencullen Baptist
Portland, Oregon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:42 PM
toddpedlar's Avatar
PB Evil Scientist...Boo!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 2,834
Thanks: 70
Thanked 600 Times in 343 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Last thing: If Paul believed that the Gospel had already been proclaimed to the whole world (as he seems to say so in Romans) why was he trying so hard to get to Spain and preach Christ where He was not named?
Because he was still on Earth and Christ hadn't come yet - perhaps he felt a particular call to go to Spain, I dont' know...

I do think the "people group focus" can be wrongheaded in that somehow it seems to have an underlying perspective that says that once we get the gospel to every single "people group" (whatever that is - my family is a people group!) then Christ will come. Rather, Christ will come when he comes... the Gospel should be spread far and wide, and let Christ come when he is ready to - let's just be about the business of spreading the Gospel to all nations (including those at home). This means we actually spread it to people.. not just make sure one person in every "people group" has heard. Pergie, I'm not saying that you're saying this - just interacting with the general theme...
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://semperubi.rtrc.net

"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 02:07 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: St.James ,NY
Posts: 716
Thanks: 226
Thanked 133 Times in 92 Posts
just a thought on this

Pergamum said;
Quote:
Still if CHrist will redeem some from every tongue, tribe and nation, and whole tribes have gone out of existence without a believer, how is Scripture still true?

Again: Christ did not say that He woul redeem some from some tribes, but some from every tribe, tongue, nations...
I have heard it said many times and seen it in print several other times that perhaps in the confessions of faith when it speaks of elect infants dying in infancy this might be the design of God to fulfill what is revealed in scripture as His Eternal purpose. They could be the every ,tongue ,tribe , and nation.
__________________
Anthony D'Arienzo
Sunday School Teacher
Hope Reformed Baptist Church:
Medford, N.Y.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 04:29 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,434
Thanks: 886
Thanked 1,083 Times in 595 Posts
KMK: Yes, many unnamed folks were evangelizing. Third John is about offering hospitality to these. And Paul went to a group of believers in Rome (i.e. there were believers there before Pual arrived).
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 04:39 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,434
Thanks: 886
Thanked 1,083 Times in 595 Posts
Todd and Iconoclast, thanks I agree 100%... Thanks.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 06:46 AM
Amazing Grace's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
Many 'missionary' minded people have perverted this thought and has led them to believe that mans goal is to do this before Christ returns. They will tramp all over God's creation, every nook and cranny and check off people groups or tongues and say, there is one more down. They believe they are called but are not called at all. Christ never knew them. They hawk Christ as a vendor hawks peanuts at a ballgame. We must never forget that some die without ever hearing of Christ. That is His electing love alone. Some are left in darkness others are not. So it is every tribe, tongu, and nation that God has so desired to bring His elect out of paganism and the rest are left. This design is not to be taken as one is more important that the other. That something lies within the group to hear the good news. It must humble us in front of the Lord and praise Him all the more.
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI

Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:56 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Smithfield, NC
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
any good calvinist knows that "all" and every" don't always mean "all" and "every"