The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Evangelism, Missions and the Persecuted Church

Evangelism, Missions and the Persecuted Church Discussions about Evangelism, the Church and missions, personal missions experiences and the Persecuted Church throughout the world.

» Online Users: 61
12 members and 49 guests
Jen, Jerusalem Blade, McPatrickClan, owenanderson, Pergamum, satz
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 12:27 PM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Henchman and Lackey
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 7,063
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 843
Thanked 925 Times in 548 Posts
Church Plants and House Churches

This is a sidebar discussion inspired by the House Church thread.

I suppose there are many different methods of planting a new church. In our situation we were planted by a large Baptist church that "seeded" us with a large cash gift and monthly support checks for a period of time. Unfortunately we never had to give account for the money we were given. Our sending church never came along side us to help. We were truly on our own except for assistance with our book keeping. Looking back on that experience I wonder whether starting off as a house church would have been better than the way we took. We were saddled with a lease for office space and rent for a school we used twice a week. We also had two full time salaries (pastor and music pastor) and benefits; all for a brand new church that was not established in the community. Had we started in a house or a smaller facility we would have being better stewards of God's money. I also believe the sense of community among the members would have been stronger.

What is the consensus on the PB about church planting and meeting in homes? Have many of you been down this road? I'm interested in hearing different stories.
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Grace Baptist Church
Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 02:51 PM
jambo's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisburn, Northern Ireland, UK
Posts: 241
Thanks: 52
Thanked 95 Times in 62 Posts
I often feel in the Christian life we tend to think how better things would have been had we done things a bit differently in the past. Yet I believe we deceive ourselves by doing so. We can all trace mistakes stemming from errors in judgement or with decisions made that may have been influenced by pride, greed, arrogance or whatever. But in the providence of God each church has the membership it has in the location it is in facing the problems that it faces with the Lord as the Vinedresser pruning and cutting in order to cultivate the vine and thus produce more fruit.

The church I currently belong to was the daughter church of another Baptist church in the suburbs of Belfast which in turn was a daughter church of one from the centre of Belfast. I would like to think that as we grow, once our numbers reach 120+ (we are currently around 40) or so that we would then plant a daughter church. I would see this starting as a house group in an area before meeting in a public rented location.

The leadership in a situation like this needs to be stable, the mother church needs to be supportive without pulling strings. Almost like a parent teaching a child to ride a bike. You have to let go and hope they don't fall off. The house group need to be established before moving into a public rented building when maturity and numbers make this viable.

I know there have been problems in the past with house groups developing their own agenda or latching onto a one doctrine mindset, but for every one horror story there are ten encouraging, God honouring stories of people converted, churches growing, people being nurtured and discples being made.
__________________
Stuart
Elder, Lambeg Baptist, Northern Ireland, UK

In Him the fulness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form and in Him you are complete (Col 2.9-10)

The sacrifice of a broken heart doth please Him but the sacrifice of a broken Christ alone doth satisfy Him (Richard Steele)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 04:50 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,774
Thanks: 1,748
Thanked 405 Times in 241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
This is a sidebar discussion inspired by the House Church thread.

I suppose there are many different methods of planting a new church. In our situation we were planted by a large Baptist church that "seeded" us with a large cash gift and monthly support checks for a period of time. Unfortunately we never had to give account for the money we were given. Our sending church never came along side us to help. We were truly on our own except for assistance with our book keeping. Looking back on that experience I wonder whether starting off as a house church would have been better than the way we took. We were saddled with a lease for office space and rent for a school we used twice a week. We also had two full time salaries (pastor and music pastor) and benefits; all for a brand new church that was not established in the community. Had we started in a house or a smaller facility we would have being better stewards of God's money. I also believe the sense of community among the members would have been stronger.

What is the consensus on the PB about church planting and meeting in homes? Have many of you been down this road? I'm interested in hearing different stories.
The problem with meeting in someone's home is that it is not a public meeting. You can bend over backwards to insist that it is public and anyone is welcome to attend, but by and large, no visitor is going to be comfortable going to some stranger's house without a specific invitation. I had meetings in my house every Fri night for years and kept insisting it was a public meeting, but never once did we have a stranger join us.

I think it is very important that churches be as public as possible. So I recommend spending the extra money to get a public building even if it doesn't appear that you need the extra space. It is better to spend more money on a public building than to try to save money by turning church into a private affair.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post:
Galatians220 (05-31-2008), Rev. Todd Ruddell (05-31-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 04:50 PM
Galatians220's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 844
Thanked 354 Times in 238 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
This is a sidebar discussion inspired by the House Church thread.

I suppose there are many different methods of planting a new church. In our situation we were planted by a large Baptist church that "seeded" us with a large cash gift and monthly support checks for a period of time. Unfortunately we never had to give account for the money we were given. Our sending church never came along side us to help. We were truly on our own except for assistance with our book keeping. Looking back on that experience I wonder whether starting off as a house church would have been better than the way we took. We were saddled with a lease for office space and rent for a school we used twice a week. We also had two full time salaries (pastor and music pastor) and benefits; all for a brand new church that was not established in the community. Had we started in a house or a smaller facility we would have being better stewards of God's money. I also believe the sense of community among the members would have been stronger.

What is the consensus on the PB about church planting and meeting in homes? Have many of you been down this road? I'm interested in hearing different stories.
Bill, I wish things had gone better for you in your effort...

We've been on the "church planting" road for about 16 months now. The Lord has provided most graciously for us in that we hold our services in a historic old schoolhouse that we rent for an astoundingly low weekly fee. The schoolhouse is maintained by the township in which we live; township employees even set up the chairs and the "pulpit" for us. Another church plant uses it in the morning and our service is at 3:30 p.m. Our rental fee includes the use of the building's kitchen for a short time of fellowship after every service.

The Lord has also provided for us in that since we've been holding regular, Lord's Day services, starting Jan. 6 of this year, we've been able to pay our church planter/evangelist/minister a stipend, but he does work at a part-time job - and his wife works as well - necessarily in order to supplement their income. We hope and pray that these aspects will change if it's the Lord's will that we grow.

The whole effort has required some substantial outlays by those who are truly interested in the type of worship that we do, but it's all been worth it. It was only a gleam in my eye in January, 2007 - but when I look around on Sunday afternoons and see the people gathered, and hear the type of Gospel preaching that we hear now, I can only thank the Lord for what He's done. We have no competition for what we offer in an approximately 20-county radius around us (that would extend, by definition, into Essex County in Canada) and it probably gives us some advantage. Last Sunday, we had some visitors from an adjacent state who drove almost two hours to reach us.

Church-planting and/or house churches require the Lord's will that they be started in the first place. They also need prayer and our reliance upon God's grace and strength, plus a strong, unwavering commitment to dedicate time, effort, energy and resources to them. They require an eagerness to reach out to other Christians and to the lost for Christ, no matter what the personal cost is and no matter how unlikely success seems to be at first glance. "His ways are not our ways..." This church-planting effort has taken me way beyond what I thought was my personal, social "comfort zone," but that had to happen.

We are blessed also in that we're only about 140 miles from the Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary in Grand Rapids.

If this schoolhouse had not been available, we would be meeting in someone's home (probably ours) every week. Would we then have been able to accommodate some of the numbers of people who come some Lord's Days? Probably not, and so all of this may not have happened at all.

We've been blessed...

Margaret
__________________
Margaret
Free Church of Scotland [Continuing]
Michigan

"He must increase, but I must decrease." - John 3:30
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 04:52 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,169
Thanks: 89
Thanked 289 Times in 205 Posts
The Church I currently attend started out meeting in a house, then moved to a storefront, then to where we are located now. They moved as they raised the money..the founding pastor didn't receive a salary or a stipend, he worked full-time in another career from which he retired, when they moved to the store front..


So I don't know why others don't do the same..
__________________
Bobbi Clark
Covenant Member
Pinewood Pres. (PCA) Middleburg

When I kept Silent, My bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Psalm 32:3
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 05:26 PM
Rev. Todd Ruddell's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lavon, TX
Posts: 375
Thanks: 138
Thanked 128 Times in 54 Posts
This is our situation as well, except that I'm not yet receiving a salary from the Church, nor will I, until we have settled in a building of our own, free from entanglements. We're building for generations to come, and not only for ourselves. We began in our home, and it was a real challenge week by week to handle 50-60 folks--but the Lord has blessed us with a large home, with plenty of restrooms, etc. There were some advantages, but I agree with Rev. Klein that a Church needs to be more public and inviting. We have moved to a leased storefront, still with our 50-60, and the increased visibility has brought some visitors, praise God. It is important however, that Church plants be done according to the Scriptures, and as I Presbyterian, I believe that is under the authority of a Presbytery, connected to other believers by a common confession, worship, and discipline. I was sent by the Westminster Presbytery of the RPCGA to this area to plant this Church, and the Lord has seen fit to bless those efforts thus far. Please pray for us, as we will for you-all, that the Lord would beautify His Church in our days.
__________________
Rev. Todd Ruddell
Pastor, Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCGA)
Wylie, TX
www.christcovenantreformedpc.org

Our best marks can contribute nothing to our justification, ...that is proper to faith. Faith cannot lodge in the soul alone, and without other graces; yet faith alone justifies before God.--G. Gillespie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rev. Todd Ruddell For This Useful Post:
Galatians220 (05-31-2008)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 05:52 PM
Galatians220's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 844
Thanked 354 Times in 238 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Todd Ruddell View Post
This is our situation as well, except that I'm not yet receiving a salary from the Church, nor will I, until we have settled in a building of our own, free from entanglements. We're building for generations to come, and not only for ourselves. We began in our home, and it was a real challenge week by week to handle 50-60 folks--but the Lord has blessed us with a large home, with plenty of restrooms, etc. There were some advantages, but I agree with Rev. Klein that a Church needs to be more public and inviting. We have moved to a leased storefront, still with our 50-60, and the increased visibility has brought some visitors, praise God. It is important however, that Church plants be done according to the Scriptures, and as I Presbyterian, I believe that is under the authority of a Presbytery, connected to other believers by a common confession, worship, and discipline. I was sent by the Westminster Presbytery of the RPCGA to this area to plant this Church, and the Lord has seen fit to bless those efforts thus far. Please pray for us, as we will for you-all, that the Lord would beautify His Church in our days.
How encouraging! Yes, you will certainly be on our prayer list! Thank you for posting this, Rev. Ruddell!

Margaret
__________________
Margaret
Free Church of Scotland [Continuing]
Michigan

"He must increase, but I must decrease." - John 3:30
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 06:24 PM
servantofmosthigh's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 224
Thanks: 17
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
The problem with meeting in someone's home is that it is not a public meeting. You can bend over backwards to insist that it is public and anyone is welcome to attend, but by and large, no visitor is going to be comfortable going to some stranger's house without a specific invitation. I had meetings in my house every Fri night for years and kept insisting it was a public meeting, but never once did we have a stranger join us.

I think it is very important that churches be as public as possible. So I recommend spending the extra money to get a public building even if it doesn't appear that you need the extra space. It is better to spend more money on a public building than to try to save money by turning church into a private affair.
I agree with you in general, but I think we should consider differing situations. In China, going public means definite imprisonment, torture and even death. Remaining as private as possible until Chinese law changes concerning Christianity is the wisest way. And through these underground home churches, Christianity is spreading in China. So praise be to God for that.

In America, many church plants meet in peoples' homes for worship, bible studies, etc. Even established churches have home bible studies and cell groups. But the difference is that established churches worship in a large facility either owned or rented. Church plants meeting in homes do not have the attendance numbers or finances to do so. But the goal and vision should always be to move to a public place eventually.

Tony Evans planted his church in his garage for the first 15 years. During those 15 years, only about 3-5 families came. Today, his church building can seat 5,000 people for one worship service. I believe he has 2 morning worship services.

I know of another church plant in NYC that began with 3 families meeting and worshiping in a basement of one family's house. Eventually, they bought a former post office building, converted it into a church building, and worship there on a regular basis.

The problem is not with worshiping in homes if the goal is to eventually move out of the homes into a public building. The problem is the Home Church Network where the idea is to remain in the homes. Their philosophy is that if the group gets too big, then divide the groups into more available homes, assign new home group leaders, but remain in the homes. The Home Church Network was conceptualized by former missionaries in China, bringing it to America. These former missionaries fail to realize that the Home Church Network philosophy isn't the ideal choice of a church in any country, but is the best choice for China so long as Chinese law bans Christianity. Whereas in America, it is not the ideal choice nor is it a good choice among many. But it is a practical choice for new church plants to get its feet on the ground until it can sustain itself in public.
__________________
Will Shin
Rockville, MD
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2008, 06:39 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,774
Thanks: 1,748
Thanked 405 Times in 241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by servantofmosthigh View Post
The problem is not with worshiping in homes if the goal is to eventually move out of the homes into a public building. The problem is the Home Church Network where the idea is to remain in the homes. Their philosophy is that if the group gets too big, then divide the groups into more available homes, assign new home group leaders, but remain in the homes. The Home Church Network was conceptualized by former missionaries in China, bringing it to America. These former missionaries fail to realize that the Home Church Network philosophy isn't the ideal choice of a church in any country, but is the best choice for China so long as Chinese law bans Christianity. Whereas in America, it is not the ideal choice nor is it a good choice among many. But it is a practical choice for new church plants to get its feet on the ground until it can sustain itself in public.
Exactly! And that is to my point in the other thread that many home churchers have good intentions, if not misguided ones.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64