» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 81 | | 34 members and 47 guests | | asc, biggandyy, Blue Tick, ChristianTrader, christianyouth, Curt, Don, Dwimble, greenbaggins, Grymir, jd.morrison, JohnGill, JTDyck, Marrow Man, MrMerlin777, mvdm, PuritanBouncer, refbaptdude, ReformedDave, Romans922, satz, shackleton, SolaGratia, TaylorOtwell, toddpedlar | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | | |
View Poll Results: What Does Your Church Serve With The Lord's Supper? | |
Wine
|    | 26 | 29.55% | |
Grape Juice
|    | 30 | 34.09% | |
Both Wine and Grape Juice
|    | 30 | 34.09% | |
Other (grapefruit juice, 7-Up, water)
|    | 2 | 2.27% |  | | 
05-29-2008, 04:33 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,748
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 404 Times in 240 Posts
| | | Wine Or Grape Juice Or Both?
What does your church serve with the Lord's Supper?
BTW, I am using the word 'wine' as it is used in the Bible. A drink that is made of grapes that has the potential for intoxication.
| 
05-29-2008, 04:34 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Leduc, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,910
Thanks: 150
Thanked 473 Times in 261 Posts
| | |
Both. I drink wine.
__________________
Rev. Daniel Kok
Pastor of Grace Reformed Church (URCNA)
Leduc, Alberta CANADA Church Blog
"there is no creature, either in heaven or on earth, who loves us more than Jesus Christ" Belgic Confession, Article 26
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following User Says Thank You to Poimen For This Useful Post: | | 
05-29-2008, 04:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
| | |
Both. Fermented Wine and Grape Juice for those whose conscious will not allow Fermented Wine (also for those with Alcoholic issues).
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
05-29-2008, 04:48 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 134
Thanks: 43
Thanked 29 Times in 24 Posts
| | | Both
We serve both: grape-juice for reasons of conscience or substance abuse issues and wine.
Wine in the middle of the tray- also a little different color...
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Gage Browning For This Useful Post: | | 
05-29-2008, 04:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 650
Thanks: 34
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
| | |
My view would be, and this is the view of many Reformed leaning Anglicans, the Lord's supper with grape juice rather then wine would be valid but irregular.
Likewise theLord's supper with leavened bread rather then unleavened would be valid but irregular.
It would also be interesting to know how many congregations use a common cup and how many use individual cups.
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI
Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
| 
05-29-2008, 05:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 134
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
| | |
On the first Lord's Day morning of the month, we have both (wine and juice) in little cups and stay in our pews.
On the third Lord's Day evening of the month, we have one cup (wine) seated around a table.
__________________ Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC West Suburbs of Chicago My Blog: Paradise Regained
"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46
| 
05-29-2008, 05:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,541
Thanks: 841
Thanked 353 Times in 237 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter It would also be interesting to know how many congregations use a common cup and how many use individual cups. | We use a common cup: another reason for me to abstain (per previous threads, which I've no desire at all to revisit). With pre-1992, transfusion-related hepatitis C and a moderate viral load that's gone into cirrhosis, I would be absolutely horrified if I passed this miserable malady along to anyone else.  Could happen.
The estimation now is that one out of every 70-80 people in this country now has hep. C. Something to think about.
Margaret
__________________
Margaret
Free Church of Scotland [Continuing]
Michigan
"He must increase, but I must decrease." - John 3:30 | 
05-29-2008, 05:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 254
Thanks: 67
Thanked 130 Times in 56 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyBessette On the first Lord's Day morning of the month, we have both (wine and juice) in little cups and stay in our pews.
On the third Lord's Day evening of the month, we have one cup (wine) seated around a table. | Interesting. What is your reasoning for this alternation?
I think the evening method is the biblical one, but our church does not have the wherewithall to do it.
We also serve both wine and white grape juice, with the grape juice cups set in the interior of the server ring plate. Thus wine cups outnumber grape juice cups about 10 to 1.
The wine we use is a sweet wine that we have imported from Israel. I cannot think of the name of it, but it is a very good wine, not dry and palatable for pretty much everyone.
__________________
Randy Harris
Heritage Church (Independent)
Oklahoma City, OK
| 
05-29-2008, 05:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 134
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harris Interesting. What is your reasoning for this alternation?
I think the evening method is the biblical one, but our church does not have the wherewithall to do it. | Unfortunately, the evening service has less people that attend, so practically, we are able to have the Supper with a single table. It really wouldn't be possible in the morning (it is a small chapel with little room for tables). A year or so ago the 3rd Lord's Day evening Supper was added while retaining the original practice for the 1st Lord's Day morning. It is a bit irregular to have two different practices, but at the moment I think it's the wisest choice for the congregation -- and it allows anyone who would like to partake in the Supper twice a month to do so.
__________________ Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC West Suburbs of Chicago My Blog: Paradise Regained
"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46
| 
05-29-2008, 05:27 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,153
Thanks: 1,635
Thanked 1,962 Times in 992 Posts
| | |
Are there any records of what the old Reformed Churches may have done in case of those with sensitive conscience or possible physical malady restrictions?
| 
05-29-2008, 05:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,748
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 404 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Are there any records of what the old Reformed Churches may have done in case of those with sensitive conscience or possible physical malady restrictions? | Was there such a thing as a 'sensitive conscience' before prohibition?
| 
05-29-2008, 05:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 145
Thanked 77 Times in 60 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Are there any records of what the old Reformed Churches may have done in case of those with sensitive conscience or possible physical malady restrictions? | Was there such a thing as a 'sensitive conscience' before prohibition? | | 
05-29-2008, 05:41 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,153
Thanks: 1,635
Thanked 1,962 Times in 992 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Are there any records of what the old Reformed Churches may have done in case of those with sensitive conscience or possible physical malady restrictions? | Was there such a thing as a 'sensitive conscience' before prohibition? | That was one reason for my asking. | 
05-29-2008, 05:49 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| |
we use wine.
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
05-29-2008, 05:58 PM
|  | Lanesterator Minimus | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 1,491
Thanks: 367
Thanked 914 Times in 374 Posts
| | |
I'm not so sure that the sensitive conscience thing can be so easily settled. After all, drunkenness most certainly did exist before Prohibition. And someone's conscience might be very tender on a topic like that even before Prohibition. That is demonstrated by my own church. We are long after Prohibition, and most people in my church don't even know about it. It simply isn't a factor, except through some kind of remembered consciousness that is inter-generational. Nevertheless, one of the churches I serve is militantly against wine in communion because of drunkenness problems in the church. In fact, they are not even open to talking about the biblical position, and what Jesus did. Prohibition is not the main reason for it. The reason is that they want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Sometimes it is amazing to me how closed to the truth of the Word some people can be.
But, as AA itself says, if an alcoholic is strongly tempted to go back to alcoholism because of one thimble-full of wine, they were going to fall anyway.
Last edited by greenbaggins; 05-29-2008 at 06:00 PM.
Reason: additional thought
| 
05-29-2008, 05:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 607
Thanks: 197
Thanked 73 Times in 53 Posts
| | |
Wine only, in individual cups
As an interesting aside, in addition to common bread, we provide gluten free bread for the ones with celiacs disease amongst us...
So the similar accommodation argument could be used for an alternate to wine, it just has not come up, to my knowledge...
__________________
Bert Mulder
Elder of the First Protestant Reformed Church of Edmonton
Edmonton Alberta Canada
| 
05-29-2008, 06:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 631
Thanks: 97
Thanked 218 Times in 116 Posts
| | |
Wine and grape juice. Two separate goblets, one loaf, by intinction.
Until a couple of months ago, it was wine only. A few people approached us (the elders) with the "what if the wine causes an alcoholic to struggle" question and our answer was that when someone approached us with more than just a hypothetical "what if", then we'd introduce grape juice. Well, that finally happened, and the next week, the grape juice was there. It's funny, because after it was introduced, the split between those that partake in the wine and those that partake in the grape juice is unexpectedly about 50/50.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raekwon For This Useful Post: | | 
05-29-2008, 06:34 PM
|  | Lackey | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 837
Thanked 911 Times in 539 Posts
| | |
We use grape juice only. I would like to switch to wine but it's a matter of incremental change in our church.
| 
05-29-2008, 06:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
| | |
Intinction? Really?
| 
05-29-2008, 06:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,748
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 404 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins I'm not so sure that the sensitive conscience thing can be so easily settled. After all, drunkenness most certainly did exist before Prohibition. And someone's conscience might be very tender on a topic like that even before Prohibition. That is demonstrated by my own church. We are long after Prohibition, and most people in my church don't even know about it. It simply isn't a factor, except through some kind of remembered consciousness that is inter-generational. Nevertheless, one of the churches I serve is militantly against wine in communion because of drunkenness problems in the church. In fact, they are not even open to talking about the biblical position, and what Jesus did. Prohibition is not the main reason for it. The reason is that they want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Sometimes it is amazing to me how closed to the truth of the Word some people can be.
But, as AA itself says, if an alcoholic is strongly tempted to go back to alcoholism because of one thimble-full of wine, they were going to fall anyway. | The temperance movement brought us Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch brought us grape juice. If there had been no temperance movement there would be no grape juice. In that regard, the only reason people would insist on grape juice is because of the temperance movement. I don't think anyone began to object with 'sensitive consciences' until the existence of grape juice. I could be wrong, however.
| 
05-29-2008, 07:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 631
Thanks: 97
Thanked 218 Times in 116 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian ![]() | | |