» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 101 | | 34 members and 67 guests | | 21st Century Calvinist, BobVigneault, Brad, CarlosOliveira, CaseyBessette, ChristopherPaul, cih1355, Clay7926, dcomin, etexas, Greg, Iconoclast, InevitablyReformed, JBaldwin, JM, Josh G, NaphtaliPress, panta dokimazete, py3ak, rescuedbyLove, rjlynam, rmdmphilosopher, Romans922, Seb, staythecourse | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
04-29-2008, 05:08 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | | What should we sing? Psalm 8 or Hebrews 2? I will respond when I get the time but thought you may be interested in this: What should we sing? Psalm 8 or Hebrews 2? « Thomas GoodwinConclusions:
Hebrews 2 makes clear what is somewhat unclear in Psalm 8. The “But we see Jesus” (v. 9) is crucial, as I have argued. In my opinion, while it is fine to sing Psalm 8, it is even better to sing Hebrews 2!!!
Why? Because Hebrews 2 makes clear what Psalm 8 leaves unclear. Man has failed, but Christ has prevailed. That is the thrust of redemptive history and I believe we ought to sing of Christ’s victory (leading many sons to glory, Heb. 2:10). Psalm 8 just doesn’t carry the same redemptive weight as Hebrews 2.
Psalm 8 becomes more glorious in Hebrews 2 because it is set in contrast to Christ. So, in singing Hebrews 2, we are not only singing a Psalm (a glorious thing), but we are also singing explicitly about Jesus (an even more glorious thing).
The NT clarifies the old. We’ve all heard Augustine’s famous quote: “The New is in the Old concealed, the Old is in the New revealed.” So, EP’s will argue that we can sing the Psalms with that understanding. But that still misses the point. The New adds content that is not present in the Psalms, such as the name “Jesus” (a loaded name, Matt. 1:21). We are to confess the name of Jesus with our lips and we do this in song as we do in prayer, preaching, and reading. Why is it that singing is so sacred that we cannot sing the name “Jesus”?
Hence, when Christ declares in v. 12 … “I will declare your name to my brothers;”, he is speaking about the full revelation of God’s name and that is not limited to actual names (e.g. Jesus, Jehovah Tsidkenu, Yahweh, etc.), but all that encompasses the name. Declaring God’s name is declaring Christ’s redemptive work (see Acts 4:12). And so there are indicatives in the NT that are much clearer than in the Old (e.g. “in love he predestined us … chosen in him”, etc., etc.) Can we even compare a single Psalm with Ephesians 1? But that is what Christ does, he sings Eph. 1 - “in the presence of the congregation I will sing your praises” (Heb 2:12b). Does Christ have the liberty to sing God’s name in its full eschatological significance? Can Christ sing “blessed be the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ”? If so, then we, by virtue of our union with him, are also free to sing those words!
So, in answer to my question in the title, we should sing both! But Heb. 2 is better, just as Christ is better than the angels, David, Moses, and Aaron!!!
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
04-29-2008, 07:45 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | | Hebrew 2 helps us to understand Psalm 8 so that we may sing it with greater understanding.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
| 
04-29-2008, 08:37 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Hebrew 2 helps us to understand Psalm 8 so that we may sing it with greater understanding. | I agree. Have you read this and this? | 
04-29-2008, 12:45 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611 Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Hebrew 2 helps us to understand Psalm 8 so that we may sing it with greater understanding. | I agree. Have you read this and this? | No. The problem with Prof. Poythress's writings is that his hermenutic would allow you to interpret Scripture any way you want. Though I do not doubt the quality of his scholarship. | 
04-29-2008, 12:50 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie The problem with Prof. Poythress's writings is that his hermenutic would allow you to interpret Scripture any way you want. |  |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |