» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 107 | | 33 members and 74 guests | | Andres, austinww, Bad Organist, baron, BertMulder, cpomann, dudley, Gord, Grillsy, Hamalas, Ivan, Jake Terpstra, Jaymin Allen, JeremiahGriffin, Jerusalem Blade, JoyFullMom, KMK, Marrow Man, Pilgrim72, PuritanCovenanter, raekwon, Re4mdant, Romans922, Theogenes, timmopussycat, Turtle, VictorBravo, WAWICRUZ, William Price, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
05-27-2009, 05:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mojave, CA
Posts: 232
Thanks: 47
Thanked 80 Times in 49 Posts
| | RPW Debate?
does anyone know where i can find a debate on Regulative Principle of Worship? preferably for free online.
i have an EP vs Hymns debate but i was looking for RPW vs normative.
thanks.
__________________ "Bible knowledge without repentance, will be but a torch to light men to hell. -Thomas Watson United Through Christ
Ricky Heeb  Grace Reformed Church (RCUS) Lancaster, CA | 
05-27-2009, 11:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | |
Perhaps I am misinformed, but this debate would seem to be as much a debate as is the Calvinist-Arminian "debate."
__________________ Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
-Jonathan Edwards- | 
05-28-2009, 09:22 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mojave, CA
Posts: 232
Thanks: 47
Thanked 80 Times in 49 Posts
| |
as far as being no contest?
i can find many calvinist arminian debates though.... | 
05-28-2009, 11:38 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Repre5entYHWH as far as being no contest?
i can find many calvinist arminian debates though....  | Well, I would contend that the Calvinist/Arminian debates, though they exist, are rather one-sided. For instance, even William Lane Craig, who possesses a doctorate in theology, attempted to say that John Calvin was a hyper-Calvinist and that he sees no distinction between Calvinism and hyper-. Even the best opponents of Calvinism simply do not know what they are talking about. But I digress.
Anyway, the best one I know of is this one, between John Frame and Darryl Hart. Frame essentially tries to take "worship" to mean "all of life," thereby turning the RPW, in effect, into a NPW.
But I do not know of any decent debate in which someone argues for a pure NPW, rather than for a really liberal RPW, for which John Frame argues.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Confessor For This Useful Post: | | 
05-28-2009, 11:44 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,497
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,111 Posts
| |
Not sure of any debate either other than the one noted which I'm not sure really how good it is.
You can read the literature of the proponents of each and how they interact. The Confessional Presbyterian journal has a series of articles in several issues on the RPW literature that is really quite helpful; unapologetically RPW; but it surveys the last 60 years of literature pro and contra. Special on the 4 issues in print available at The Confessional Presbyterian in the store. Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor Quote:
Originally Posted by Repre5entYHWH as far as being no contest?
i can find many calvinist arminian debates though....  | Well, I would contend that the Calvinist/Arminian debates, though they exist, are rather one-sided. For instance, even William Lane Craig, who possesses a doctorate in theology, attempted to say that John Calvin was a hyper-Calvinist and that he sees no distinction between Calvinism and hyper-. Even the best opponents of Calvinism simply do not know what they are talking about. But I digress.
Anyway, the best one I know of is this one, between John Frame and Darryl Hart. Frame essentially tries to take "worship" to mean "all of life," thereby turning the RPW, in effect, into a NPW.
But I do not know of any decent debate in which someone argues for a pure NPW, rather than for a really liberal RPW, for which John Frame argues. | | | The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post: | | 
05-28-2009, 11:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress | Highly recommended. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Confessor For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |