» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 58 | | 2 members and 56 guests | | satz | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
09-06-2007, 07:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 682
Thanks: 38
Thanked 49 Times in 36 Posts
| | | John Frame on RPW
__________________ Erick Bohndorf, Covenant Baptist Church, KS http://qayaqtraveler.blogspot.com/ The question for us today is, will we be like the majority of Israel and continue to look in fear at the giants in the land and urge our fellow Christians to be "realistic," or will we be like Joshua and Caleb and faithfully follow our king, trusting to fulfill every one of his promises completely? | 
09-06-2007, 08:11 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,515
Thanks: 803
Thanked 724 Times in 444 Posts
| |
Though there was no date, this I think is fairly old. For reviews of Frame's faulty view of the RPW, see Smith and Lachman's "Reframing Presbyterian Worship: A Critical Survey of the Worship Views of John M. Frame and R. J. Gore The Confessional Presbyterian 1 (2005) 116-150, and Frank J. Smith, Ph.D., D.D. with Chris Coldwell "The Regulative Principle of Worship:Sixty Years in Reformed Literature Part One (19461999)" CPJ 2 (2006) 89-164, and Part Two (20002007) CPJ 3 forthcoming (2007) 159-219.
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice The Blue Banner Archive When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the old dead orthodoxy, and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they differ from it only in words. This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
09-06-2007, 09:45 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 11,734
Thanks: 890
Thanked 2,207 Times in 1,048 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Though there was no date, this I think is fairly old. For reviews of Frame's faulty view of the RPW, see Smith and Lachman's "Reframing Presbyterian Worship: A Critical Survey of the Worship Views of John M. Frame and R. J. Gore The Confessional Presbyterian 1 (2005) 116-150, and Frank J. Smith, Ph.D., D.D. with Chris Coldwell "The Regulative Principle of Worship:Sixty Years in Reformed Literature Part One (19461999)" CPJ 2 (2006) 89-164, and Part Two (20002007) CPJ 3 forthcoming (2007) 159-219. |  The CPJ 1, 2, and 3 has an incredibly thoroughgoing analysis of the RPW with specifce reference to Gore et al.
| 
09-06-2007, 09:52 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,515
Thanks: 803
Thanked 724 Times in 444 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Though there was no date, this I think is fairly old. For reviews of Frame's faulty view of the RPW, see Smith and Lachman's "Reframing Presbyterian Worship: A Critical Survey of the Worship Views of John M. Frame and R. J. Gore The Confessional Presbyterian 1 (2005) 116-150, and Frank J. Smith, Ph.D., D.D. with Chris Coldwell "The Regulative Principle of Worship:Sixty Years in Reformed Literature Part One (19461999)" CPJ 2 (2006) 89-164, and Part Two (20002007) CPJ 3 forthcoming (2007) 159-219. |  The CPJ 1, 2, and 3 has an incredibly thoroughgoing analysis of the RPW with specifce reference to Gore et al. | Thanks Rich; let me add: Frame may be good on many things (for instance he is cited well in W. Gary Crampton's piece on Open Theism in the 2006 issue of The Confessional Presbyterian) but he is simply OFF the Westminster reservation on the RPW and that is putting it kindly.
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice The Blue Banner Archive When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the old dead orthodoxy, and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they differ from it only in words. This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
09-07-2007, 08:20 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress but he is simply OFF the Westminster reservation on the RPW and that is putting it kindly. |
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
09-07-2007, 08:47 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,257
Thanks: 111
Thanked 124 Times in 76 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Though there was no date, this I think is fairly old. For reviews of Frame's faulty view of the RPW, see Smith and Lachman's "Reframing Presbyterian Worship: A Critical Survey of the Worship Views of John M. Frame and R. J. Gore The Confessional Presbyterian 1 (2005) 116-150, and Frank J. Smith, Ph.D., D.D. with Chris Coldwell "The Regulative Principle of Worship:Sixty Years in Reformed Literature Part One (19461999)" CPJ 2 (2006) 89-164, and Part Two (20002007) CPJ 3 forthcoming (2007) 159-219. |  The CPJ 1, 2, and 3 has an incredibly thoroughgoing analysis of the RPW with specifce reference to Gore et al. | Thanks Rich; let me add: Frame may be good on many things (for instance he is cited well in W. Gary Crampton's piece on Open Theism in the 2006 issue of The Confessional Presbyterian) but he is simply OFF the Westminster reservation on the RPW and that is putting it kindly. | Yes, very kindly
__________________
Chris Mangum Presbyterian Reformed Church of Charlotte
student, GPTS .357 Mangum Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world. James 1:27
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |