Closed Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Change in Our Order of Worship: any problems?

  1. #1
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts

    Change in Our Order of Worship: any problems?

    PLEASE NO EP COMMENTS:

    Our old order of worship:
    Call to Worship
    Invocation Prayer
    Hymn
    Pastoral Prayer
    Psalm
    OT/NT Scripture Reading
    Giving of Tithes/Offerings
    Doxology/Gloria Patri
    NT/OT Scripture Reading
    Preaching of the Scriptures
    Hymn
    Benediction
    What we are thinking about doing:
    Call to Worship
    Invocation Prayer
    Hymn
    OT/NT Scripture Reading
    Pastoral Prayer
    Psalm
    Giving of Tithes/Offerings
    NT/OT Scripture Reading
    Preaching of the Scriptures
    Hymn
    Benediction
    We want to not only reorganize so the order is Word, Prayer, Singing (Repeat), but also we seem to believe that the Doxology/Gloria Patri have become non-effective anymore, because we do it every Lord's Day. It is the only thing we do in our worship currently that we do exactly the same. The people seem to not think about what they are singing about anymore when we come to that point because they have done it for so many years.

    What do you guys think of the Reorganization and also the taking out of the Doxology/Gloria Patri?

    We were also thinking that after a few months of no Doxology/Gloria Patri, that we could add it back in after the Benediction (knowing the Benediction is the end of worship) [perhaps only in the evening].

    Any thoughts?
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. #2
    Tim's Avatar
    Tim
    Tim is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    1,460
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 509 Times in 290 Posts
    Rev. Barnes,

    My questions are:

    1. How exactly do you intend the reordering of sing/read/pray to benefit the flock?
    2. How exactly is it intended that the presence/absence of the Doxology/Gloria Patri benefit the flock?

    After answering these questions, the next step would be to communicate this to the congregation. If they can't see any benefit to this, then the change is pointless. You might feel better about the order, but will your congregation? Remember that I know nothing of your congregation and where they are spiritually?

    Your care in ordering the worship is to be commended, for sure. However, to be blunt, and just speaking for myself, I can't see that I would benefit more or less either way. And I am someone who has been greatly sensitized to the issue of order in worship due to my current church in Cape Town doing things in a way that I would not choose.

    Is your main reason for reordering word/prayer/singing so that it become more dialogical? If so, tell us more about this.

    At any rate, I would be most delighted to have either order of worship on the Lord's Day.

    Blessings.
    Last edited by Tim; 10-08-2009 at 05:47 AM.
    Tim Lindsay
    member, Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, Halifax, NS, Canada
    Living in Cape Town, South Africa
    "at the foot of Table Mountain, underneath the Southern Cross, not far from the Cape of Good Hope"
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. #3
    Unashamed 116's Avatar
    Unashamed 116 is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ft Rucker Al
    Posts
    633
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 194 Times in 126 Posts
    I think your idea is a good one. People often come to "worship" God in ritual and end up just playing a part of a church play. This is the same oppostion I face when I mention that I would like to see the sacrament of the Lords Supper done every week. I think that no matter what you do, you will find people that will fight you over it. I say do it though.
    Joseph F Scibbe
    Chaplain Assistant
    Chapel of Wings Ft Rucker Al
    Ephesians 1:4-7, 1 Thessalonians 2:8, Romans 12:1-2
    Titus 2:2 - But you, teach what accords with sound doctrine.

    http://twitter.com/just_joe_scibbe
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. #4
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Any other thoughts, especially on the use or non-use of the doxology/gloria patri?
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  5. #5
    jwithnell's Avatar
    jwithnell is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Leesburg, VA
    Posts
    1,444
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked 648 Times in 400 Posts
    OK, this is from a layperson's perspective. The doxology is often associated with a giving of thanks. (Note John's description of heavenly worship "... when the living creatures give glory and honor and thanks..." Rev. 4:9.) There are many alternatives our there, We Give Thee but Thine Own, and so forth, which could be used for a change-up if you think its necessary.

    Is the Psalm sung? Or read responsively? That would help with my other observation. Namely more of a need for a congregational response.
    JWithnell
    Member Bethel OPC
    Virginia
    http://learningyesican.blogspot.com/
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to jwithnell For This Useful Post:

    he beholds (10-09-2009)

  7. #6
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jwithnell View Post
    OK, this is from a layperson's perspective. The doxology is often associated with a giving of thanks. (Note John's description of heavenly worship "... when the living creatures give glory and honor and thanks..." Rev. 4:9.) There are many alternatives our there, We Give Thee but Thine Own, and so forth, which could be used for a change-up if you think its necessary.

    Is the Psalm sung? Or read responsively? That would help with my other observation. Namely more of a need for a congregational response.
    It is sung, like the hymns, as a response to the Word of God.
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  8. #7
    reformedminister's Avatar
    reformedminister is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield MO
    Posts
    370
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 203 Times in 107 Posts
    We sing the Gloria Patri after our Assurance of Pardon and the Doxology after the offering every week. I think it can have more meaning if you do it more often. We take the Lord's Supper every week also and it is precious. I like the other changes you are considering.
    Rev. Andy Eppard
    Associate Minister
    First Cumberland Presbyterian Church
    Springfield, MO
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  9. #8
    raekwon's Avatar
    raekwon is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,252
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 771 Times in 340 Posts
    This looks fine, Andrew. The only real problem I can foresee with the non-inclusion of the Doxology or Gloria Patri is that some folks who've grown used to it might be rattled and thus complain.

    Have you considered maybe substituting something else for them, such as praying the Lord's Prayer in unison (if before the sermon) or confessing a creed in unison (if after)?
    Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
    Online presence: blog | twitter | facebook


    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  10. #9
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Rae,

    Now you are introducing major problems if I did that. But we have asked one of the members who we thought might be upset and she seemed to be okay with it. But we will ask the congregation to bare, bear, grizzly bear with us for a few weeks to see how it goes.

    Our congregation is typically concerned with one thing as it has to do with what we do in worship (which I am thankful for). Is what we do in worship, commanded to be done in worship? That's why I think this should go over smoothly. These two things are not commanded specifically to be done in public worship. It would be similar (in some ways) to singing come thou fount every week for over 10 years or perhaps some of you would rather sing for 10 years, Just as I am.

    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  11. #10
    austinww's Avatar
    austinww is offline. :eek:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Marcos, Texas
    Posts
    2,205
    Thanks
    968
    Thanked 656 Times in 374 Posts
    I would recommend a confession of sin followed by assurance of grace and pardon. You also seem to be lacking a creed, which I think would be beneficial. And finally - The Lord's Supper! But perhaps I have just increased your service time too much!

    I enjoy doing the doxology or Gloria Patri every week. We do ours a capella, after the confession and assurance. I don't think removal of it would be that big of a deal, though.

    -----Added 10/8/2009 at 02:38:26 EST-----

    I think corporate confession of sin should be in every service in some way, shape, or form, even if it's just part of the pastoral prayer you mentioned, rather than a recitation, although I think confessing sin in unison has its benefits. We always follow it with silent confession of individual sin as well, for just about a minute. It will remind your congregation of utter dependence on God's grace every week - not that you are not already reminding them, of course.
    Austin Williamson
    Electrical engineering student at Texas State University
    Member of Church of the Cross (PCA)
    San Marcos, TX


    Let us, then, as we would show ourselves to be godly, keep close to the rule of worship, and in the things of Jehovah go no further than we can say, 'It is written'.
    ~Rev. Thomas Watson, The Godly Man's Picture
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  12. #11
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by austinww View Post
    I would recommend a confession of sin followed by assurance of grace and pardon. You also seem to be lacking a creed, which I think would be beneficial. And finally - The Lord's Supper! But perhaps I have just increased your service time too much!

    I enjoy doing the doxology or Gloria Patri every week. We do ours a capella, after the confession and assurance. I don't think removal of it would be that big of a deal, though.

    -----Added 10/8/2009 at 02:38:26 EST-----

    I think corporate confession of sin should be in every service in some way, shape, or form, even if it's just part of the pastoral prayer you mentioned, rather than a recitation, although I think confessing sin in unison has its benefits. We always follow it with silent confession of individual sin as well, for just about a minute. It will remind your congregation of utter dependence on God's grace every week - not that you are not already reminding them, of course.
    Are those things commanded by God to do in Public Worship?
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  13. #12
    austinww's Avatar
    austinww is offline. :eek:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Marcos, Texas
    Posts
    2,205
    Thanks
    968
    Thanked 656 Times in 374 Posts
    The manner in which it is done is not dictated; for instance, it doesn't say confession of sin must be recited. However, confessing is commanded in some form, and I think it's significant enough to have as a distinct part of the service, IMO.

    As for reading a creed, I can only point to the existence of early creeds in Paul's letters, as well as Jesus' giving us the Lord's prayer to recite. The fact that it's in the plural indicates that the early church recited things, especially prayers and creeds. I do not believe that we are commanded to recite in unison as opposed to some other method, but it has many benefits.

    -----Added 10/8/2009 at 02:48:14 EST-----

    The Lord's Supper, however - a definite yes! And Apostolic precedent would suggest it should be done every meeting, ideally.
    Austin Williamson
    Electrical engineering student at Texas State University
    Member of Church of the Cross (PCA)
    San Marcos, TX


    Let us, then, as we would show ourselves to be godly, keep close to the rule of worship, and in the things of Jehovah go no further than we can say, 'It is written'.
    ~Rev. Thomas Watson, The Godly Man's Picture
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  14. #13
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by austinww View Post
    The manner in which it is done is not dictated; for instance, it doesn't say confession of sin must be recited. However, confessing is commanded in some form, and I think it's significant enough to have as a distinct part of the service, IMO.

    As for reading a creed, I can only point to the existence of early creeds in Paul's letters, as well as Jesus' giving us the Lord's prayer to recite. The fact that it's in the plural indicates that the early church recited things, especially prayers and creeds. I do not believe that we are commanded to recite in unison as opposed to some other method, but it has many benefits.

    -----Added 10/8/2009 at 02:48:14 EST-----

    The Lord's Supper, however - a definite yes! And Apostolic precedent would suggest it should be done every meeting, ideally.
    Thanks for responding and your explanation. I think we should confess our sin as well, I believe we should do it before and during and after! During, we typically make that part of our pastoral prayer, even the invocation sometimes. Coming before a holy God to worship Him, and we are but sinners. How can we stand, but by His mercy.

    The creed, I have more of a problem with, if it was going to be the Apostle's, Nicene or something else. The problem with these is that they are made by men and interpreted differently. But before I myself become an EPer because that is the argument I was basically using, I will digress.

    The Lord's Supper. Definitely a part of worship, but I don't agree it should be weekly. There are a few threads on this topic.
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  15. #14
    austinww's Avatar
    austinww is offline. :eek:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Marcos, Texas
    Posts
    2,205
    Thanks
    968
    Thanked 656 Times in 374 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by austinww View Post
    The manner in which it is done is not dictated; for instance, it doesn't say confession of sin must be recited. However, confessing is commanded in some form, and I think it's significant enough to have as a distinct part of the service, IMO.

    As for reading a creed, I can only point to the existence of early creeds in Paul's letters, as well as Jesus' giving us the Lord's prayer to recite. The fact that it's in the plural indicates that the early church recited things, especially prayers and creeds. I do not believe that we are commanded to recite in unison as opposed to some other method, but it has many benefits.

    -----Added 10/8/2009 at 02:48:14 EST-----

    The Lord's Supper, however - a definite yes! And Apostolic precedent would suggest it should be done every meeting, ideally.
    Thanks for responding and your explanation. I think we should confess our sin as well, I believe we should do it before and during and after! During, we typically make that part of our pastoral prayer, even the invocation sometimes. Coming before a holy God to worship Him, and we are but sinners. How can we stand, but by His mercy.

    The creed, I have more of a problem with, if it was going to be the Apostle's, Nicene or something else. The problem with these is that they are made by men and interpreted differently. But before I myself become an EPer because that is the argument I was basically using, I will digress.

    The Lord's Supper. Definitely a part of worship, but I don't agree it should be weekly. There are a few threads on this topic.
    We often use a passage of Scripture as a creedal statement. There are legion that are well suited for this, if you decided to do it.

    As for the Lord's Supper, I suppose I must leave that discussion for those threads. I can't imagine going back to not doing it every week, though, as at my old church. I need it! I guess I need to read those threads. For me, the argument is as simple as the fact that frequent observance is both the Scriptural example and the universal practice of the early church, but perhaps I am oversimplifying. I will check out those threads when I can.
    Last edited by austinww; 10-08-2009 at 03:10 PM. Reason: typo
    Austin Williamson
    Electrical engineering student at Texas State University
    Member of Church of the Cross (PCA)
    San Marcos, TX


    Let us, then, as we would show ourselves to be godly, keep close to the rule of worship, and in the things of Jehovah go no further than we can say, 'It is written'.
    ~Rev. Thomas Watson, The Godly Man's Picture
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  16. #15
    Edward's Avatar
    Edward is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Plano TX
    Posts
    2,667
    Thanks
    831
    Thanked 894 Times in 598 Posts
    Let me warn you that you are buying yourself a passel of trouble. Is it worth the pain and division it is going to bring to the congregation to do this?

    Rightly or wrongly folks get comfortable with familiar elements and forms. If you jerk out something that predates you, you are going to get push back. Don't think that just because the elders and 'leaders' are on board, the back row is as well.

    If you feel compelled to make this change, make sure that the congregation is well taught on the reasons first. Give them a chance to offer feedback BEFORE the change is made. Or, you could start being open to a new call....

    Just because you may be right (and I'm not sure that you are) it doesn't mean that you should jump in.
    Edward
    Deacon
    PCA
    Texas
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Edward For This Useful Post:

    Montanablue (10-08-2009)

  18. #16
    JBaldwin's Avatar
    JBaldwin is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pickens, SC
    Posts
    3,627
    Thanks
    1,071
    Thanked 1,378 Times in 742 Posts
    Frankly, it was a relief for me to start attending a church that doesn't do everything exactly the same every week. We sing the doxology from time to time, and that's enough for me. The truth is, we sing something that expresses the same ideas as the doxology in our hymns and psalms every week anyway. The doxology simply says it in a short and precise way.
    J Baldwin
    Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
    Pickens, SC
    “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

    Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  19. #17
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    Let me warn you that you are buying yourself a passel of trouble. Is it worth the pain and division it is going to bring to the congregation to do this?

    Rightly or wrongly folks get comfortable with familiar elements and forms. If you jerk out something that predates you, you are going to get push back. Don't think that just because the elders and 'leaders' are on board, the back row is as well.

    If you feel compelled to make this change, make sure that the congregation is well taught on the reasons first. Give them a chance to offer feedback BEFORE the change is made. Or, you could start being open to a new call....

    Just because you may be right (and I'm not sure that you are) it doesn't mean that you should jump in.
    The session is pretty sure that this will not bring division, but might actually enhance our worship and make it more joyful!
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  20. #18
    Edward's Avatar
    Edward is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Plano TX
    Posts
    2,667
    Thanks
    831
    Thanked 894 Times in 598 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post

    The session is pretty sure that this will not bring division, but might actually enhance our worship and make it more joyful!
    They *might* be right about it enhancing the service and make it more joyful (but that sounds like oversell on the benefit of removing the Gloria and Doxology - and I'm trying to be as generous as possible here). BUT the odds are against them being right on the issue of bringing division.

    Are they (and you) humble and wise enough to back down if it does cause problems? Why would they think that no one would be offended and tempted to a non-Bilblical response? What are you going to do to prepare the congregation for the changes?

    -----Added 10/9/2009 at 08:47:33 EST-----

    Quote Originally Posted by JBaldwin View Post
    Frankly, it was a relief for me to start attending a church that doesn't do everything exactly the same every week.
    The key word in your sentence is 'start'. You went in with that understanding.

    If you had been sitting in the same spot on the same pew for 60 years, you might have been less willing to embrace that change.

    Young pastors should always be sensitive to the informal leaders in the body. Or they'll learn a lesson that they may have missed in seminary.
    Edward
    Deacon
    PCA
    Texas
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  21. #19
    Romans922's Avatar
    Romans922 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    2,748
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 621 Times in 303 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post

    The session is pretty sure that this will not bring division, but might actually enhance our worship and make it more joyful!
    They *might* be right about it enhancing the service and make it more joyful (but that sounds like oversell on the benefit of removing the Gloria and Doxology - and I'm trying to be as generous as possible here). BUT the odds are against them being right on the issue of bringing division.

    Are they (and you) humble and wise enough to back down if it does cause problems? Why would they think that no one would be offended and tempted to a non-Bilblical response? What are you going to do to prepare the congregation for the changes?
    You sure are an optimist.
    TE Andrew
    PCA, MS

    Visit: A Profitable Word
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69