» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 93 | | 27 members and 66 guests | | asc, Beoga, Blue Tick, Blueridge Believer, ChristianTrader, Curt, davidsuggs, Don, Dwimble, Jeff_Bartel, Jen, JohnGill, Me Died Blue, MOSES, nleshelman, PuritanBouncer, satz, shackleton, toddpedlar | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
05-19-2008, 08:06 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 536
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 61 Posts
| | | Acapella singing
Is mandatory acapella singing part of EP and the regulative principle or is that an entirely separate issue?
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
05-19-2008, 08:11 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,997
Thanks: 884
Thanked 838 Times in 529 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Is mandatory acapella singing part of EP and the regulative principle or is that an entirely separate issue? | They tend to hang together, but I guess anyone could come to conclusions and hold to only one and not the other. For instance, Southern Presbyterians like Thornwell, Girardeau, Dabney, Adger, etc. were non EP but opposed to musical instrumentation in worship. There were some exceptions the other way I suspect though rarer I think; I don't recall any names.
Last edited by NaphtaliPress; 05-19-2008 at 09:07 PM.
Reason: sp.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post: | | 
05-19-2008, 08:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,403
Thanks: 749
Thanked 614 Times in 400 Posts
| | |
__________________
DAVIDIVS DOCTVS VTRIVSQVE LINGVAE
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Currently in the process of transferring membership to an as-yet-undecided church in Chapel Hill
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics
| 
05-19-2008, 08:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
| | |
I would recommend John L. Girardeau's Instrumental Music in Public Worship for you Leslie.
| 
05-19-2008, 08:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 22,324
Thanks: 2,012
Thanked 2,663 Times in 1,589 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Is mandatory acapella singing part of EP and the regulative principle or is that an entirely separate issue? | EP and a capella singing are separate issues which are both covered by the regulative principle of worship. Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I would recommend John L. Girardeau's Instrumental Music in Public Worship for you Leslie. | Links and Downloads Manager - Worship - Instrumental Music in the Worship of the Church - The PuritanBoard
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project
"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
| | The Following User Says Thank You to VirginiaHuguenot For This Useful Post: | | 
05-20-2008, 04:13 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 536
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 61 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Is mandatory acapella singing part of EP and the regulative principle or is that an entirely separate issue? | They tend to hang together, but I guess anyone could come to conclusions and hold to only one and not the other. For instance, Southern Presbyterians like Thornwell, Girardeau, Dabney, Adger, etc. were non EP but opposed to musical instrumentation in worship. There were some exceptions the other way I suspect though rarer I think; I don't recall any names. | Do people actually sing psalm 150, deliberately acapella and immobile? Seems as if that is like boasting of humility or hanging foamrubber windchimes.
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
05-20-2008, 04:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
| | |
If one understands the context of Psalm 150 then it is not a problem. Much like one reads the Levitical law concerning sacrifice and the dismemberment of the bull.
| 
05-21-2008, 12:04 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 536
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 61 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian If one understands the context of Psalm 150 then it is not a problem. Much like one reads the Levitical law concerning sacrifice and the dismemberment of the bull. | Huh?
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
05-21-2008, 12:09 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian If one understands the context of Psalm 150 then it is not a problem. Much like one reads the Levitical law concerning sacrifice and the dismemberment of the bull. | Huh? | God has told us to sing psalms. That includes Psalm 66 which states I will go into thy house with burnt offerings: I will pay thee my vows,
Which my lips have uttered, and my mouth hath spoken, when I was in trouble.
I will offer unto thee burnt sacrifices of fatlings, with the incense of rams; I will offer bullocks with goats. Selah. Are you going to start doing that or are you going to sing with understanding?
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
05-22-2008, 04:38 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 536
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 61 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611 Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian If one understands the context of Psalm 150 then it is not a problem. Much like one reads the Levitical law concerning sacrifice and the dismemberment of the bull. | Huh? | God has told us to sing psalms. That includes Psalm 66 which states I will go into thy house with burnt offerings: I will pay thee my vows,
Which my lips have uttered, and my mouth hath spoken, when I was in trouble.
I will offer unto thee burnt sacrifices of fatlings, with the incense of rams; I will offer bullocks with goats. Selah. Are you going to start doing that or are you going to sing with understanding? | God in His sovereignty has made sacrifices impossible since the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. If the temple were still standing, I would have no problem whatsoever with offering thank offerings and the like, but not offerings of atonement. In our current culture, the equivalent of the burnt offerings--making and keeping vows--is certainly appropriate in relationship to God. It seems rather arbitrary to just throw out any meaning that doesn't agree with one's theological bias rather than asking how the original meaning works out in the current age and culture.
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
05-22-2008, 05:10 PM
| | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
| |
? Foamrubber windchimes ?  I am not even EP and you lost me on that.
__________________
~etexas~
| 
05-23-2008, 04:23 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie God in His sovereignty has made sacrifices impossible since the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. If the temple were still standing, I would have no problem whatsoever with offering thank offerings and the like, but not offerings of atonement. In our current culture, the equivalent of the burnt offerings--making and keeping vows--is certainly appropriate in relationship to God. It seems rather arbitrary to just throw out any meaning that doesn't agree with one's theological bias rather than asking how the original meaning works out in the current age and culture. | The answer is not the destruction of the temple in AD70 but rather the destruction of the true temple in AD30(ish) as we learn in the Book of Hebrews. Christ's death fulfilled the typical worship of the Temple, hence the end of bloody sacrifice, the Levitical priesthood etc. Now because temple worship was put to an end by Christ's death and musical instruments were tied to the Levitical priesthood, it is absurd to say that the musical instruments are to be continued. They are to be used just as much as bloody sacrifice, i.e. not at all.
We then sing the psalms recognising that they speak of spiritual truths, that they contain a command to use a harp does not mean that we are to start using harps, no more than the command to sacrifice bulls means we will start burning bulls in church on Sunday.
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
05-24-2008, 11:25 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 536
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 61 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas ? Foamrubber windchimes ?  I am not even EP and you lost me on that.  | Hanging foam rubber windchimes is superficially affirming one thing while simultaneously negating the same. In the case of windchimes, one affirms his love of the sound of the wind but making them out of foam rubber negates the same. Ditto with singing Psalm 150, deliberately (not out of necessity) acapella and immobile: one verbally affirms the appropriate use of instrumentation and dance in the worship of God while factually disaffirming the same. When one does this kind of thing in relationship to other people, it's called double-binding, like the guy who bought his mother an expensive mother's day card and wrote inside "You have always been like a mother to me".
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
05-25-2008, 07:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
| | |
Leslie you are missing the point. Those in the EP-side believe that the use of instruments in worship have ceased following the end of Temple Worship. So no matter how many times you sing Psalm 150 and following the mere fact you sing about instruments is a Non-sequitur.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |