» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 129 | | 30 members and 99 guests | | Amazing Grace, AV1611, blhowes, CaseyBessette, CatechumenPatrick, christianyouth, doctorcello, Don, glorifyinggodinwv, Gomarus, jwithnell, kvanlaan, lukeh021471, nleshelman, R Harris, raekwon, Theoretical, TimV, toddpedlar, turmeric, westminken, Yodas_Prodigy, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-21-2008, 07:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 443
Thanks: 10
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
| | | Apple Safari Browser Just got some info on this and installed. Anyone know anything about it yet? I see Mozilla CEO is upset that it is sent out as an update.
__________________
Donald P. Grubb theol46@embarqmail.com
Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH
John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
| 
03-22-2008, 12:30 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 4
Thanked 44 Times in 30 Posts
| | | I use it on the Mac as my preferred browser. I have Firefox as well but tend to only use it when Safari will not work for a particular Web site (which is very rare).
If I were using Windows as a client machine, I would use Firefox or Safari as my deault browser because IE is so insecure. Microsoft's ongoing attempt to make IE more secure is to make the web more and more inaccessible when using it. | 
03-22-2008, 12:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 704
Thanks: 37
Thanked 141 Times in 89 Posts
| | | Get on Safari, google Camino, download Camino and install it. Once it's on your system, delete Safari and any other browsers you have. They're all horrible in comparison to Camino.
P.S. Camino is made by Mozilla, but Firefox doesn't seem to operate as well as Camino does.
__________________
Andrew DeShazo, Deacon
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN "Send Zenas the lawyer and Apollos on their journey with haste, that they may lack nothing." -Titus 3:13 http://foolish-wisdom.blogspot.com/ | 
03-22-2008, 04:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 63
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Paul Just got some info on this and installed. Anyone know anything about it yet? I see Mozilla CEO is upset that it is sent out as an update. | Firefox first, Safari second. All other browsers.....meh. | 
03-22-2008, 05:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,039
Thanks: 334
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
| | | Firefox #1 | 
03-22-2008, 05:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 935
Thanks: 63
Thanked 57 Times in 42 Posts
| | My problem is I have an old version of OS X and I don't get free upgrades on Safari. Yeah, if I owned a rival OS, I'd get free upgrades. Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe I'd like Safari more if I had a newer version, but alas, I'm cheap. Camino is for OS X and only works on OS X, but it uses the Gecko rendering engine that Firefox uses. So, Camino is a native port of Firefox for Mac. It's fast (-er than Firefox), smooth, and uses Mac style.
The only problem with Camino is that if you like Firefox extensions and plug-ins, they don't work with Camino. But if you don't use these things, then Camino is better -- uses less memory and works faster in OS X.
I switched to Camino from Firefox when I noticed Firefox running slow and sometimes crashing. Camino doesn't do that for me. | 
03-22-2008, 05:33 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 63
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
| | | Use Camino for regular websurfing and use FF for stuff you *neeD* plug-ins for and such. | 
03-22-2008, 05:50 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 10,089
Thanks: 553
Thanked 1,504 Times in 688 Posts
| | | I noticed it got installed automatically when I updated iTunes yesterday. | 
03-22-2008, 06:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 935
Thanks: 63
Thanked 57 Times in 42 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles I noticed it got installed automatically when I updated iTunes yesterday. | I have Safari 1.3.2 (from 2005!) on my computer. I can't download the new version (3.1) unless I have OS X Tiger or Leopard -- since I have Panther, well . . I'm out of luck. | 
03-22-2008, 06:19 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 10,089
Thanks: 553
Thanked 1,504 Times in 688 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by StaunchPresbyterian Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles I noticed it got installed automatically when I updated iTunes yesterday. | I have Safari 1.3.2 (from 2005!) on my computer. I can't download the new version (3.1) unless I have OS X Tiger or Leopard -- since I have Panther, well . . I'm out of luck. | I should clarify that I'm running Windows Vista. The OP didn't mention what was meant by the Mozilla CEO being upset by "an update" but I'm pretty sure it has to do with the fact that Apple pushed it's browser down with the latest iTunes update so millions now have a browser on their desktop whereas with Firefox you'd have to go out to download/install yourself. | 
03-22-2008, 10:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 63
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
| | Apple pulled a Microsoft.  | 
03-22-2008, 10:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 399
Thanks: 52
Thanked 93 Times in 50 Posts
| | | To be fair to Apple, there was a checkbox next to "Safari" on the Apple Software Update app. Unchecking it would've prevented installation. | 
03-23-2008, 01:00 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 10,089
Thanks: 553
Thanked 1,504 Times in 688 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon To be fair to Apple, there was a checkbox next to "Safari" on the Apple Software Update app. Unchecking it would've prevented installation. | To be fair to Microsoft, they were just putting their browser in with their Operating System. | 
03-23-2008, 01:30 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 443
Thanks: 10
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles Quote:
Originally Posted by StaunchPresbyterian Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles I noticed it got installed automatically when I updated iTunes yesterday. | I have Safari 1.3.2 (from 2005!) on my computer. I can't download the new version (3.1) unless I have OS X Tiger or Leopard -- since I have Panther, well . . I'm out of luck. | I should clarify that I'm running Windows Vista. The OP didn't mention what was meant by the Mozilla CEO being upset by "an update" but I'm pretty sure it has to do with the fact that Apple pushed it's browser down with the latest iTunes update so millions now have a browser on their desktop whereas with Firefox you'd have to go out to download/install yourself. | Sorry...that's exactly it.
__________________
Donald P. Grubb theol46@embarqmail.com
Berean Baptist Church, Mansfield, OH
Mansfield, OH
John 6:63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.
The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life.
| 
03-23-2008, 04:13 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 492
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
| | | I tried Firefox, Camino and even Opera on my MacBook. I'm sticking with Safari because it runs better than any of the 3rd party apps. And 3.1 runs even faster! I love it!
__________________ John Bergsing Faithful husband to Kelly Loving father to Gabriel, Faith, Jacob & Chloe Decatur, AL | 
03-23-2008, 05:46 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 10,089
Thanks: 553
Thanked 1,504 Times in 688 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jbergsing I tried Firefox, Camino and even Opera on my MacBook. I'm sticking with Safari because it runs better than any of the 3rd party apps. And 3.1 runs even faster! I love it! | I think that for 90% of web browsing this is going to be true. The reason for this is that Safari is designed to run only properly coded web sites. A good amount of the "bloat" of the Firefox or the IE browsers has to do with code designed to deal with "sloppy" programming of sites. Hence, there are some sites that don't run properly under Opera.
It's interesting if you've ever worked with an Open Source program like Joomla or Drupal that a lot of the extensions to these programs usually have a section called "Safari compatibility" because of this issue. | 
03-23-2008, 08:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 63
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon To be fair to Apple, there was a checkbox next to "Safari" on the Apple Software Update app. Unchecking it would've prevented installation. | Yeah, that's about normal. But I think Apple took advantage of the fact that most Windows users aren't used to the Apple Software Update window and are too lazy to read  let alone uncheck a box...
(*ducks all the WinFlames coming soon*) | 
03-23-2008, 08:41 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Kunming, Yunnan, China
Posts: 216
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Quote: |
Get on Safari, google Camino, download Camino and install it. Once it's on your system, delete Safari and any other browsers you have. They're all horrible in comparison to Camino.
| That was true before Safari 3.1. Camino is extremely slow in comparison (not as slow as Omniweb or Firefox, but much slower than Safari). Furthermore, Safari now has true single window mode, ad-block support and much better PDF, RSS and search support. Furthermore, you can addon Inquisitor which might be the best all around addon to any browser whether PC or Mac.
__________________
Ranger
SBC, but personally confess the 1689 LBCF
Yunnan, China
"If we regularly beheld the glory of Christ, our Christian walk with God would become more sweet and pleasant, our spiritual light and strength would grow daily stronger and our lives would more gloriously represent the glory of Christ. Death would be most welcome to us." - John Owen
| 
03-23-2008, 09:03 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 10,089
Thanks: 553
Thanked 1,504 Times in 688 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCalvinist ...most Windows users aren't used to the Apple Software Update window and are too lazy to read... | Guilty. | 
03-23-2008, 09:33 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 399
Thanks: 52
Thanked 93 Times in 50 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon To be fair to Apple, there was a checkbox next to "Safari" on the Apple Software Update app. Unchecking it would've prevented installation. | To be fair to Microsoft, they were just putting their browser in with their Operating System. | Yeah, that never really bothered me either and I didn't understand the collective "harumph" from the online community back when MS decided to do that. There was nothing that said that IE had to be used. | 
03-23-2008, 09:42 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 10,089
Thanks: 553
Thanked 1,504 Times in 688 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon To be fair to Apple, there was a checkbox next to "Safari" on the Apple Software Update app. Unchecking it would've prevented installation. | To be fair to Microsoft, they were just putting their browser in with their Operating System. | Yeah, that never really bothered me either and I didn't understand the collective "harumph" from the online community back when MS decided to do that. There was nothing that said that IE had to be used. | That was a different time in the industry. Microsoft had fallen behind and missed the bow wave to some extent and Netscape was really the browser at the time. I think a lot of it had to do with the "irrational exuberance" of the time that believed that countless $billions would be made by the owner of the dominant browser and here you have this behemoth that makes the OS for nearly every computer on the planet and they're bundling their browser into the OS in a way that cannot be distinguished from the OS. It's sort of funny to look back at now but, at the time, it was a big deal. | 
03-23-2008, 07:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | | | |