Can someone tell me whether it is 'open' in the following sense: if I use wave server A can I cc (or whatever word used for include) someone who uses wave server B? Suppose there are as many wave servers as email servers - will this openness be transparent to me?
I can imagine it's possible given some kind of open ID and a distributed list of people and which servers they use, but that imagination includes very considerable technical hurdles! Anyone know what it aims at in this regard?
If it is open in that sense, it will definitely replace email, if not then it will be used on every organisation's intranet and private forums like the PB, but still at a fraction of its potential. Many organisations already have some of the features of waves in their in-house systems to communicate, collaborate and knowledge share, so it will ultimately be only an easier alternative, but not earth-shaking.
Oh, erm, the above has AFAIK and IMHO implicitly subsisting throughout - I've read exactly two short articles on Wave
Paul
No denomination, affiliated with FIEC
"Deliver me from worldly dispositions, for I am born from above and destined for glory" - Valley of Vision
"They think it strange that you do not plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation" - Peter
Bookmarks