» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
11-17-2007, 10:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,489
Thanks: 602
Thanked 856 Times in 448 Posts
| | | Praying over places, villages,etc
I know that the charismatics do it, but can we?
If we entered a home or avillage, town, etc where magic or very blatant superstition and animistic ritual is practiced, can we pray over that town or proclaim the town clean? Should we pray over the house we are in so that evil practices do not harm us? Should we pray that evil spirits leave the village?
One town I went to stated that for many years after a local evanglest entered no one believed and treated him roughly, but for the sake of his prayers, the spirits left the forest and did not bother them further.
Can we claim places for Christ and proclaim them clean?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
11-18-2007, 08:31 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 6,111
Thanks: 246
Thanked 177 Times in 97 Posts
| | |
Charismatics aren't the only ones...this is also common amoung fundamental baptists.
__________________
JC
URCNA
PA
"Forgiveness is primarily for our own sake, so that we no longer carry the burden of resentment. But to forgive does not mean we will allow injustice again." --Jack Kornfield
| 
11-18-2007, 11:21 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,489
Thanks: 602
Thanked 856 Times in 448 Posts
| | |
Hmmm....is it common among us?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
11-18-2007, 02:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 6,111
Thanks: 246
Thanked 177 Times in 97 Posts
| | |
dunno...I found it to be superstitious.
__________________
JC
URCNA
PA
"Forgiveness is primarily for our own sake, so that we no longer carry the burden of resentment. But to forgive does not mean we will allow injustice again." --Jack Kornfield
| 
11-18-2007, 02:55 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,607
Thanks: 827
Thanked 738 Times in 458 Posts
| | |
I suppose something such as a service opening a new building for public worship is fine, as long as the place is not treated beyond being merely a place, and there are no special ceremonies tending to say the contrary. The Westminster Divines rejected any superstitious view of "holy' places. "As no place is capable of any holiness, under pretence of whatsoever dedication or consecration; so neither is it subject to such pollution by any superstition formerly used, and now laid aside, as may render it unlawful or inconvenient for Christians to meet together therein for the publick worship of God. And therefore we hold it requisite, that the places of publick assembling for worship among us should be continued and employed to that use." Westminster Directory for the Publick Worship of God, An Appendix Touching Days and Places for Publick Worship.
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice The Blue Banner Archive When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the old dead orthodoxy, and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they differ from it only in words. This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
11-18-2007, 03:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,517
Thanks: 256
Thanked 55 Times in 35 Posts
| | |
I don't know if the practice is correct, but I think we can see from the Gospels that demons can possess non-human animals which is something I wouldn't expect. Maybe they can reside in inanimate objects as well. I certainly don't think the place where you pray matters at all--God hears our prayers wherever we are.
| 
12-09-2007, 03:05 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,489
Thanks: 602
Thanked 856 Times in 448 Posts
| | |
If people put a place under a curse, or a place was the site of occult practices can a mere place be any more evil than another?
An example: In village X near where I went last month a local guy said that demons haunted the jungle until an evangelist came. The local guy said no one believed at that point, but that the evil spirits nonetheless fled the evangelsit's presence and did not bother them any longer unless invited back.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |